Carl James Peterson v Attorney-General - SC 87/2015
Summary
Civil Appeal – Whether an extension of time should be granted – Whether leave to appeal directly to the Supreme Court should be granted to allow the applicant to challenge the decision in Attorney-General v Chapman [2011] NZSC 110, [2012] 1 NZLR 462 – Whether Associate Judge Christiansen’ s judgment should be set aside. [2015] NZHC 1336 CIV 2015 463 22
Result
A The application for leave to appeal is dismissed.
B The applicant must pay costs of $2,500 to the respondent.
23 October 2015
B The applicant must pay costs of $2,500 to the respondent.
23 October 2015
Related Documents
Leave judgment - leave dismissed — CARL JAMES PETERSON v ATTORNEY-GENERAL [2015] NZSC 154 23 October 2015 (PDF 75 KB)
Additional Information
C J PETERSON v ATTORNEY-GENERAL [2015] NZHC 1336 [12 June 2015]