Ian Edward Hitchcock v The Queen - SC 126/2016
Summary
Criminal Appeal – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in finding that the trial judge’s summing up on consent in relation to a charge of sexual violation was sufficient – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in finding that no miscarriage of justice arose as a result of the trial Judge’ s failure to direct the jury that they should consider whether the applicant knew that he was supplying cannabis. [2016] NZCA 465 CA265/2015
Result
A The application for an extension of time is granted.
B The application for leave to appeal is dismissed.
8 March 2017
___________
The application for recall is dismissed.
17 May 2017
B The application for leave to appeal is dismissed.
8 March 2017
___________
The application for recall is dismissed.
17 May 2017
Related Documents
Leave judgment - leave dismissed — IAN EDWARD HITCHCOCK v R [2017] NZSC 29 8 March 2017 (PDF 82 KB)
Recall judgment — IAN EDWARD HITCHCOCK v R [2017] NZSC 71 17 May 2017 (PDF 67 KB)
Additional Information