Taylor Jade Schmidt v Noel Robert Hair - SC 17/2015
Summary
Civil appeal – whether the Court of Appeal erred in concluding that no cause of action for knowing receipt and unjust enrichment was open to the applicant – whether the Court of Appeal erred in its approach to evidential questions.[2015] NZCA 6 CA 794/2011
Result
Application for leave to appeal is dismissed. Costs to the respondent of $2,500.00
17 April 2015
17 April 2015
Related Documents
Leave judgment - leave dismissed — TAYLOR JADE SCHMIDT v NOEL ROBERT HAIR [2015] NZSC 40 17 April 2015 (PDF 76 KB)
Additional Information
SCHMIDT V EBADA PROPERTY INVESTMENTS LIMITED CA794/2011 [2015] NZCA 6 3 February 2015