Brownie Joseph Harding v The King
Case information | Brownie Joseph Harding v The King SC 64/2020
Supreme Court
Criminal Appeal - application for leave to bring an appeal
Search results for NZSC
Found 7338 items matching NZSC.
Case information | Brownie Joseph Harding v The King SC 64/2020
Supreme Court
Criminal Appeal - application for leave to bring an appeal
Case information | M v Attorney General (in respect of the Ministry of Health), Waitemata District Health Board and Capital and Coast District Health Board SC 82/2020
Supreme Court
Civil Appeal
Case information | D v New Zealand Police SC 31/2019
Supreme Court
Criminal Appeal
Case information | Janet Elsie Lowe v Director General of Health, Ministry of Health and Chief Executive, Capital and Coast District Health Board SC 97/2016
Supreme Court
Civil appeal – Employment Relations Act 2000, s 5 – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in its interpretation and application of the term “engaged” in the definition of “homeworker” in s 5 – Whether the Court of Appeal acted outside its jurisdiction. [2016…
Case information | D Newton and L Newton v Family Court at Auckland, Robyn F Von Keisenburg and B Lake SC 60/2022
Supreme Court
Leave to Appeal
Leave to appeal dismissed
Civil Appeal - Application for leave to bring an appeal
Case information | D Newton and L Newton v Family Court at Auckland and B Lake SC 62/2022
Supreme Court
Leave to Appeal
Leave to appeal dismissed
Civil Appeal - Application for leave to bring an appeal
Case information | Mark Anthony Whittington v UDC Finance Limited SC 92/2021
Supreme Court
Leave to Appeal
Leave to appeal dismissed
Civil Appeal - Application for leave to bring an appeal
Case information | Vincent Ross Siemer v Deputy Registrar of the Supreme Court of New Zealand SC 101/2020
Supreme Court
Leave to Appeal
Leave to appeal dismissed
Civil Appeal - Application for leave to bring an appeal
Case information | Nicholas Paul Alfred Reekie v Complainant A & B SC 95/2019
Supreme Court
Leave to Appeal
Leave to appeal dismissed
Civil Appeal – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in refusing to grant the applicant an extension of time.