Search Results
Search results for 53
Found 1225 items matching 53.
[2024] NZSC 29
[2022] NZSC 138
[2016] NZSC 30
[2016] NZSC 62
Tasman District Council v Louise Buchanan, Keith Marshall and Alistair Donald as Trustees of the Buchanan Marshall Family Trust
Case information | Tasman District Council v Louise Buchanan, Keith Marshall and Alistair Donald as Trustees of the Buchanan Marshall Family Trust [2024] NZCA 133
Court of Appeal
Decision of Public Interest
Fencing of Swimming Pools Act 1987 — Inspections of swimming pool — Negligent misstatement —Novel duty of care — Limitation periods — Appeal allowed In 2004 the Tasman District Council (the Council) granted building consent for an architecturally designe…
BM v The Queen
Case information | BM v The Queen SC 31/2016
Supreme Court
Leave to Appeal
Leave to appeal dismissed
Criminal appeal – Crimes Act 1961, s 195 – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in concluding the sentence was not manifestly excessive.[2016] NZCA 53 CA 599/2015
Alesco New Zealand Limited and others v Commissioner of Inland Revenue
Case information | Alesco New Zealand Limited and others v Commissioner of Inland Revenue SC 33/2013
Supreme Court
Income Tax Acts 1994 and 2004 – Tax Administration Act 1994 - Whether the Court of Appeal erred in concluding that the applicant’s funding transactions were “tax avoidance arrangements” in terms of the Income Tax Acts 1994 and 2004 – Whether the Court …
Graham Ashley Robert Palmer v The Queen
Case information | Graham Ashley Robert Palmer v The Queen SC 119/2010
Supreme Court
Leave to Appeal
Leave to appeal dismissed
Criminal – Appeal against conviction for dishonest use of a GST return – whether the conduct of the investigation and criminal prosecution of the applicant was in breach of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990, s 30 of the Sentencing Act 2002 and the …
Allen Louis Harriman v The Queen
Case information | Allen Louis Harriman v The Queen SC 28/2008
Supreme Court
Leave to Appeal
Leave to appeal dismissed
Criminal – appeal against conviction and sentence – whether the Court of Appeal erred in finding various photographs, and expert evidence about the use of drug terminology, admissible – whether the Judge’ s ‘expert evidence’ direction to the jury was inco…