Skip to content. | Skip to navigation


Navigation

Document Actions

Upcoming cases - Supreme Court

                                        

As at 17 July 2019

Sittings of the Supreme Court are open to the public.

Upcoming fixtures are set out below:

JULY

AUGUST

OCTOBER

NOVEMBER

 

July fixtures list (pdf, 346 KB)

August fixtures list (pdf, 131 KB)

 

JULY

23 July

Case  number              SC 23/2019                                    case information
Case name                                

The Queen
P D Marshall
v
R(SC 23/2019)
W D McKean
W(SC 23/2019)
A M Harvey 

Criminal Appeal

Judges   Winkelmann CJ, Glazebrook, O'Regan, Ellen France and Williams JJ                  
Case Summary Order prohibiting publication of the judgment and any part of the proceedings (including the result) in news media or on the internet or other publicly available database until final disposition of trial. Publication in law report or law digest permitted. 
Grounds on which leave was granted                                                               Order prohibiting publication of the judgment and any part of the proceedings (including the result) in news media or on the internet or other publicly available database until final disposition of trial. Publication in law report or law digest permitted. 
Supreme Court leave application decision        Not publicly available
Court of Appeal decision Not publicly available
High Court decision                 Not publicly available
 

25 July

Case  number              SC 27/2019                                         case information
Case name                                

FTG Securities Limited
A J Forbes QC and H M Weston
v
Bank of New Zealand

T C Weston QC and K M Paterson

Stephen John Tubbs and Colin Anthony Gower as receivers of Tuam Ventures Limited (in receivership and in liquidation)

Robert Bruce Walker as Liquidators of Tuam Ventures Limited (in receivership and in liquidation)
K C Francis

Oral Leave Hearing

Judges   Winkelmann CJ, O'Regan and Williams JJ
Case Summary Civil Appeal – Whether a prohibition on assignment of a deed of priority and subordination without the consent of the other party is enforceable – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in refusing to make declarations as to the interpretation of the deed of priority and subordination.
Court of Appeal decision                 FTG SECURITIES LIMITED v BANK OF NEW ZEALAND [2019] NZCA 16 [20 February 2019]

 

AUGUST

19 August

Case  number              SC 38/2019  | SC 39/2019                                       case information
Case name                                

W (SC38/2019)
CWJ Stevenson

v

The Queen
A Markham

The Queen
A Markham

v

W (SC39/2019)
CWJ Stevenson

Criminal Appeal

Judges   Winkelmann CJ, Glazebrook, O'Regan, Ellen France and Williams  JJ

Case Summary

Grounds on which leave was granted

Order prohibiting publication of the judgment and any part of the proceedings (including the result) in news media or on the internet or other publicly available database until final disposition of the trial. Publication in law report or law digest permitted.

Supreme Court leave application            

Not publicly available

 

Court of Appeal decision

Not publicly available

High Court leave decision

Not publicly available

 

21 and 22 August

Case  number              SC 116/2018                                         case information
Case name                                

Lodge Real Estate Limited
LJ Taylor QC, MA Cavanaugh

Monarch Real Estate Limited
DH McLellan QC, MS Anderson

Brian King
DH McLellan QC, MS Anderson

Jeremy O’Rourke
LJ Taylor QC, MA Cavanaugh

v

Commerce Commission
JCL Dixon QC, LCA Farmer, DS Houghton                                                 

 

Civil Appeal

Judges   Winkelmann CJ, Glazebrook, O'Regan, Ellen France and Williams  JJ
Case Summary Civil Appeal – Commerce Act 1986, s 30 – Whether there must be a moral obligation for the purposes of price fixing – Whether there was an agreement to vendor fund – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in allowing the respondent’s appeal against the High Court’s decision.
Grounds on which leave was granted Leave to appeal is granted (Commerce Commission v Lodge Real Estate Ltd
[2018] NZCA 523) on the question whether the Court of Appeal should have
allowed the respondent’s appeal to that Court except as set out at C below.
C
To the extent the application for leave seeks to argue that the respondent
had not adequately pleaded and to appeal from the dismissal of the
applicants’ cross-appeal the application is dismissed.
Supreme Court leave application decision LODGE REAL ESTATE LIMITED v COMMERCE COMMISSION [2019] NZSC 28 [19 March 2019]
Court of Appeal decision COMMERCE COMMISSION v LODGE REAL ESTATE LIMITED [2018] NZCA 523 [23 November 2018]
High Court leave decision COMMERCE COMMISSION v LODGE REAL ESTATE LTD & ORS [2017] NZHC 1497 [2 November 2017]

 

27 August

Case  number              SC 95/2018                                               case summary                            
Case name                                

Mark Edward Lundy
J H M Eaton QC, J A Kincade, J Oliver-Hood

v

The Queen
P J Morgan QC and A Markham

 

Criminal Appeal

Judges   William Young , O'Regan, Williams, Arnold and Miller  JJ
Case Summary Criminal Appeal – Crimes Act 1961, s 385 – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in dismissing the applicant’s appeal against conviction under the proviso to s 385(1) despite finding that certain evidence presented at trial was inadmissible.
Grounds on which leave was granted The approved question is whether the Court of Appeal erred in applying the
proviso to s 385(1) of the Crimes Act 1961.
Supreme Court leave application decision MARK EDWARD LUNDY v R [2019] NZSC 45 [6 May 2019]
Court of Appeal decision LUNDY v R [2018] NZCA 410 [9 October 2018]

 

OCTOBER

1 October

Case  number                              SC 29/2019
Case name                                                                                             Vivien Judith Madsen-Ries and Henry David Levin as liquidators of Debut Homes Limited and Debut Homes Limited (in liquidation) v Leonard Wayne Cooper and Leonard Wayne Cooper and Tracey Cooper as trustees of the L & T Cooper Family Trust
Judges Winkelmann CJ, William Young ,Glazebrook, O'Regan and Ellen France JJ          

 

3 October

Case  number SC 25/2019
Case name                                  David Noel Roigard v The Queen
Judges  Winkelmann CJ, Glazebrook, O'Regan, Ellen France, and Williams JJ

 

30 October

Case  number                              SC 31/2019
Case name Kalana Yasassri Dayaratne v New Zealand Police
Judges Winkelmann CJ, William Young ,Glazebrook, O'Regan and Ellen France JJ          

 

NOVEMBER

12 November

Case  number                              SC 40/2019
Case name 127 Hobson Street Limited and Sunil Govind Parbhu v Honey Bees Preschool Limited and Jason James
Judges Winkelmann CJ, Glazebrook, O'Regan, Ellen France, and Williams JJ