Ian James Burden, PGT Reclaimed (International) Limited and Plantation Grown Timbers (Vietnam) Limited v ESR Group (NZ) Limited - SC 96/2023
Media releases
Summary
Result
B The approved questions are as follows:
(a) Was the Court of Appeal correct to conclude, for the purposes of s 9(1) of the Copyright Act 1994, that a copyright holder’s consent is not necessary for a work to be “in circulation”?
(b) Was the Court of Appeal correct to conclude, for the purposes of s 9(1) of the Copyright Act 1994, that circulation outside of New Zealand could constitute “circulation”?
7 December 2023
_____________________________________________
A The appeal is allowed.
B The High Court order awarding damages is reinstated.
C The respondent must pay the appellants costs of $25,000, plus usual disbursements. We allow for second counsel.
D Costs in the Courts below, if not agreed, can be settled by those Courts.
25 March 2025
Date of Hearing
26 April 2024
Judges
Glazebrook, Ellen France, Williams Kós and O'Regan JJ
Case Synopses
Submissions from counsel
- Hearing date 26 April 2024 Appellants Submissions (PDF 2.3 MB)
- Hearing date 26 April 2024 Appellants Chronology Fact (PDF 194 KB)
- Hearing date 26 April 2024 Appellants Chronology WCT dates (PDF 215 KB)
- Hearing date 26 April 2024 Appellants Roadmap (PDF 177 KB)
- Hearing date 26 April 2024 Appellants Further Submissions (PDF 279 KB)
- Hearing date 26 April 2024 Respondent submissions (PDF 351 KB)
- Hearing date 26 April 2024 Respondent Roadmap (PDF 225 KB)
- Hearing date 26 April 2024 Respondent Further Submissions (PDF 870 KB)
Hearing Transcripts
Related Documents
High Court decision — BURDEN v ESR GROUP (NZ) LTD [2022] NZHC 1818 [29 July 2022]
Court of Appeal decision — ESR GROUP (NZ) LIMITED v BURDEN [2023] NZCA 335 [31 July 2023]
Leave judgment - leave granted — IAN JAMES BURDEN v ESR GROUP (NZ) LIMITED [2023] NZSC 159 [7 December 2023] (PDF 160 KB)
Substantive judgment — BURDEN v ESR GROUP (NZ) LIMITED [2025] NZSC 18 [25 March 2025] (PDF 469 KB)