Document Actions

Case information 2018

2018| 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004

Listed below are the substantive Supreme Court cases for 2018 along with appeals still to be determined or cases awaiting hearing.

Information giving an overview of the case is included along with media releases and links to judgments being appealed when available.

All 2018 - 2014 Supreme Court cases dismissed or deemed to be dismissed where a notice of abandonment was received can be found here.

Transcripts for cases heard before the Supreme Court are included provided they are not suppressed. Transcripts from pre-trial hearings are not published until the final disposition of trial. These are unedited transcripts and they are not a formal record of the Court’s proceedings. The Ministry of Justice does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of any material and recommends that users exercise their own skill and care with respect to its use.

Updated 16 October 2018

Case information summary 2018 (as at 12 October 2018) - cases granted leave to appeal (PDF, 225 KB)
Case information summary 2018 (as at 4 October 2018) - cases where leave to appeal decision not yet made (PDF, 270 KB)

Case number	SC 7/2018
Case Name	M v The Queen

SC 10/2018 Reserved judgment:

Case number	SC 10/2018
Case Name	Northland Environmental Protection Society Incorporated v The Chief Executive of the Ministry for Primary Industries, Comptroller of Customs and The Chief Executive of the Ministry for Culture and Heritage.
Summary	Civil Appeal – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in its interpretation of the Forests Act 1949 and the Protected Objects Act 1975.
Result	A Leave to appeal is granted (Northland Environmental Protection Society Incorporated v Chief Executive of the Ministry for Primary Industries [2017] NZCA 607). B The approved questions are: (a) Was the Court of Appeal correct in its interpretation of “finished or manufactured indigenous timber product” and the effect of the export restrictions in s 67C of the Forests Act 1949? (b) Was the Court of Appeal correct to hold that some or all swamp kauri is not a “protected New Zealand object” as defined in s 2(1) of the Protected Objects Act 1975? 19 April 2018
Transcript	Hearing date 20 June 2018 William Young, Glazebrook, O'Regan, Ellen France and Arnold JJ
High Court judgment	Northland Environmental Protection Society Inc. v Ministry of Primary Industries & Ors [2016] NZHC 308 [1 March 2017]
Judgment appealed from - Court of Appeal	NORTHLAND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SOCIETY INC v THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE MINISTRY FOR PRIMARY INDUSTRIES [2017] NZCA 607 [19 December 2017]
Leave judgment - leave granted	NORTHLAND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION SOCIETY INCORPORATED v CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE MINISTRY FOR PRIMARY INDUSTRIES [2018] NZSC 36

Reserved judgment SC 11/2018

Case number	SC 11/2018
Case Name	Ngāi Tai Ki Tāmaki Tribal Trust v Minister of Conservation, Fullers Group Limited and Motutapu Island Restoration Trust
Summary	Civil Appeal – Conservation Act 1987 and Hauraki Gulf Marine Park Act 2000 – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in concluding that concessions to conduct guided tours over Rangitoto and Motutapu could be granted despite iwi objections.
Result	A Leave to appeal is granted (Ngāi Tai ki Tāmaki Tribal Trust v Minister of Conservation [2017] NZCA 613). B The approved question is whether the Court of Appeal was correct to dismiss the appeal of the applicant to that Court. 8 May 2018
Transcript	Hearing date : 14 and 15 August 2018 Chief Justice, William Young, Glazebrook, O'Regan and Ellen France JJ.
High Court judgment	NGAI TAI KI TAMAKI TRIBAL TRUST v MINISTER OF CONSERVATION [2017] NZHC 300 [1 March 2017]
Judgment appealed from - Court of Appeal	NGĀI TAI KI TĀMAKI TRIBAL TRUST v MINISTER OF CONSERVATION [2017] NZCA 613 [19 December 2017]
Leave judgment - leave granted	NGĀI TAI KI TĀMAKI TRIBAL TRUST v MINISTER OF CONSERVATION [2018] NZSC 41 [8 May 2018]

Reserved judgment SC 21/2018

Case number	SC 21/2018
Case Name	Colin Graeme Craig v Jordan Henry Williams
Summary	Civil Appeal – Defamation – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in setting aside the decision of the High Court to order a full retrial – (cross-appeal) Whether the Court of Appeal erred in upholding the High Court’s order setting aside the jury’s verdict on damages.
Result	A Leave to appeal and leave to cross appeal is granted (Williams v Craig [2018] NZCA 31). B The approved question is whether the Court of Appeal erred in allowing the appeal to that Court in part and dismissing the cross appeal to that Court. 4 July 2018 _________________
Hearing date	4 and 5 September 2018 Chief Justice, William Young, Glazebrook, Ellen France and Arnold JJ.
High Court judgment	WILLIAMS v CRAIG [2017] NZHC 724 [12 April 2017]
Judgment appealed from - Court of Appeal	WILLIAMS v CRAIG [2018] NZCA 31 [5 March 2018]
Leave judgment - leave granted	CRAIG v WILLIAMS [2018] NZSC 61 [4 July 2018]

Reserved judgment SC 22/2018

Case number	SC 22/2018
Case Name	Jeremy James McGuire v The Secretary for Justice
Summary	Civil Appeal – Legal Services Act 2011 – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in striking out the applicant’s application for judicial review – Whether a self-represented litigant who is a practising lawyer can receive a costs award.
Result	A Leave to appeal is granted (McGuire v The Secretary for Justice [2018] NZCA 37) B The approved question is whether the Court of Appeal was correct to dismiss the appeal and allow the cross-appeal 12 June 2018
Transcript	Hearing date 1 August 2018 Chief Justice, William Young, Glazebrook, O'Regan and Ellen France JJ.
High Court judgment	JEREMY JAMES MCGUIRE v THE SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE [2017] NZHC 365 [7 March 2017]
Judgment appealed from - Court of Appeal	MCGUIRE v THE SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE [2018] NZCA 37 [9 March 2018]
Leave judgment - leave granted	JEREMY JAMES MCGUIRE v THE SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE [2018] NZSC 50 [12 June 2018]

Case number	SC 35/2018
Case Name	Mark Robert Sandman v Colin Charles McKay, Roger David Cann and David John Clark
Summary	Civil Appeal – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in granting summary judgment to the respondents on the cause of action against them.
Result	A Leave to appeal is granted (McKay v Sandman [2018] NZCA 103, [2018] NZAR 707). B The approved question is whether the Court of Appeal erred in granting summary judgment to the respondents on the cause of action against them. 7 August 2018
Hearing date	12 November 2018
High Court judgment	M R SANDMAN v R J GIBONEY AND C C MCKAY AND C C MCKAY, R D CANN AND D J CLARK [2017] NZHC 1832 [4 August 2017]
Judgment appealed from - Court of Appeal	MCKAY & ORS v MARK ROBERT SANDMAN [2018] NZCA 103 [20 April 2018]
Leave judgment - leave granted	MARK ROBERT SANDMAN V COLIN CHARLES MCKAY, ROGER DAVID CANN AND DAVID JOHN CLARK [2018] NZSC 71 [7 August 2018]

Case number	SC 36/2018
Case Name	S v The Queen
Summary	Criminal Appeal – Miscarriage of justice – Whether the Court of Appeal was right to dismiss the appeal on the mode of trial point.
Result	A The application for leave to appeal is granted (S (CA377/2017) v R [2018] NZCA 101). B The approved question is whether the Court of Appeal was right to dismiss the appeal on the mode of trial point. 30 July 2018
Hearing date	16 October 2018
District Court judgment	Not publicly available
Judgment appealed from - Court of Appeal	S (CA377/2017) v R [2018] NZCA 101 [19 April 2018]
Leave judgment - leave granted	S (SC 36/2018) v R [2018] NZSC 64 [30 July 2018]

Case number	SC 37/2018
Case Name	T v The Queen
Summary
Result
District Court judgment	Not publicly available
Judgment appealed from - Court of Appeal	T(CA670/2016) v The Queen [2018] NZCA 102

Case number	SC 40/2018
Case Name	F v The Queen
Summary	Order prohibiting publication of the judgment and any part of the proceedings (including the result) in news media or on the internet or other publicly available database until final disposition of trial. Publication in law report or law digest permitted.
Result	Order prohibiting publication of the judgment and any part of the proceedings (including the result) in news media or on the internet or other publicly available database until final disposition of trial. Publication in law report or law digest permitted. 15 June 2018
High/District Court judgment	Not publicly available
Judgment appealed from - Court of Appeal	Not publicly available

Case number	SC 42/2018
Case Name	George WHICHMAN v The Queen
Summary
Result
Judgment appealed from - Court of Appeal	Not publicly available

Case number	SC 47/2018
Case Name	Ruiren Xu and Diamantina Trust Limited v IAG New Zealand Limited
Summary	Civil Appeal – Whether a replacement benefit payable under an insurance policy issued by the respondent was assignable.
Result	A Leave to appeal is granted (Xu v IAG New Zealand Ltd [2018] NZCA 149). B The approved question is whether the Court of Appeal was correct to dismiss the applicants’ appeal against the judgment of Nation J 2 August 2018
Hearing date	13 November 2018
High Court judgment	XU & DIAMANTINA TRUST LTD v IAG NZ LIMITED [2017] NZHC 1964 [17 August 2017]
Judgment appealed from - Court of Appeal	XU AND ANOR v IAG NEW ZEALAND LIMITED [2018] NZCA 149 [11 May 2018]
Leave judgment - leave granted	RUIREN XU AND DIAMANTINA TRUST LIMITED V IAG NEW ZEALAND LIMITED [2018] NZSC 68 [2 August 2018]

Case number	SC 51/2018
Case Name	T v The Queen
Summary
Result
High Court judgment	Not publicly available
Judgment appealed from - Court of Appeal	T (CA3/2016) v R [2018] NZCA 107 [20 April 2018]

Case number	SC 52/2018
Case name	H v Refugee and Protection Officer
Summary	Civil Appeal – Immigration Act 2009, s 249 – Whether the Court of Appeal was right to dismiss the applicant’s appeal.
Result	A The application for leave to appeal is granted (H (CA580/2017) v Refugee and Protection Officer [2018] NZCA 188). B The approved question is whether the Court of Appeal was right to dismiss the appeal. 24 August 2018
Hearing date	29 October 2018
High Court judgment	Not publicly available
Judgment appealed from - Court of Appeal	The confidentiality of the name or identifying particulars of the appellant and of his claim or status must be maintained pursuant to s 151 of the immigration act 2009.
Leave judgment - leave granted	H (SC 52/2018) v REFUGEE AND PROTECTION OFFICER [2018] NZSC 79 [24 August 2018]

Case number	SC 53/2018
Case Name	H v Queen
Summary
Result
District Court judgment	Not publicly available
Judgment appealed from - Court of Appeal	Not publicly available

Case number	SC 54/2018
Case Name	Mathias Ortmann, Bram Van der Kolk and Finn Habib Batato v The United Staes of America and The District Court at North Shore
Summary	Civil Appeal –Whether the Court of Appeal erred in dismissing the appeal against the High Court’s dismissal of the application for judicial review of the District Court’s determination under s 24 of the Extradition Act 1999.
Result
High Court judgment	Mathias Ortmann, Bram Van der Kolk and Finn Habib Batato v The United Staes of America and The District Court at North Shore [2017] NZHC 189
Judgment appealed from - Court of Appeal	ORTMANN v UNITED STATES OF AMERICA [2018] NZCA 233 [5 July 20

Case number	SC 55/2018
Case Name	Finn Habib Batato v The United States of America
Summary	Criminal Appeal – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in upholding the District Court’s determination under s 24 of the Extradition Act 1999 – Whether the Supreme Court of New Zealand has jurisdiction to hear an appeal under the Extradition Act if the proceedings were commenced before 1 July 2013.
Result
High Court judgment	Mathias Ortmann, Bram Van der Kolk and Finn Habib Batato v The United Staes of America and The District Court at North Shore [2017] NZHC 189
Judgment appealed from - Court of Appeal	ORTMANN v UNITED STATES OF AMERICA [2018] NZCA 233 [5 July 20

Case number	SC 56/2018
Case Name	Mathias Ortmann and Bram Van der Kolk v The United States of America
Summary	Criminal Appeal – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in upholding the District Court’s determination under s 24 of the Extradition Act 1999 – Whether the Supreme Court of New Zealand has jurisdiction to hear an appeal under the Extradition Act if the proceedings were commenced before 1 July 2013.
Result
High Court judgment	Mathias Ortmann, Bram Van der Kolk and Finn Habib Batato v The United Staes of America and The District Court at North Shore [2017] NZHC 189
Judgment appealed from - Court of Appeal	ORTMANN v UNITED STATES OF AMERICA [2018] NZCA 233 [5 July 20

Case number	SC 57/2018
Case Name	Kim Dotcom v The United States of America
Summary	Criminal Appeal – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in its interpretation and application of the Copyright Act 1994 – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in its findings on the admissibility of evidence challenging the record of the case.
Result
High Court judgment	Mathias Ortmann, Bram Van der Kolk and Finn Habib Batato v The United Staes of America and The District Court at North Shore [2017] NZHC 189
Judgment appealed from - Court of Appeal	ORTMANN v UNITED STATES OF AMERICA [2018] NZCA 233 [5 July 20

Case number	SC 58/2018
Case Name	Kim Dotcom v The United States of America and The District Court at North Shore
Summary	Civil Appeal – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in dismissing the appeal against the High Court’s dismissal of the application for judicial review of the District Court’s determination under s 24 of the Extradition Act 1999 – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in dismissing the application to adduce further evidence.
Result
High Court judgment	Mathias Ortmann, Bram Van der Kolk and Finn Habib Batato v The United Staes of America and The District Court at North Shore [2017] NZHC 189
Judgment appealed from - Court of Appeal	ORTMANN v UNITED STATES OF AMERICA [2018] NZCA 233 [5 July 20

Case number	SC 60/2018
Case Name	Yusuke (David) Sena v The Queen
Summary	Criminal Appeal – Criminal Procedure Act 2011, s 232(2)(b) – Judge-alone trial –Whether the High Court Judge applied the right standard of review to the applicant’s appeal against conviction.
Result	A Leave to appeal direct to this Court, against the High Court’s judgment (Sena v New Zealand Police [2017] NZHC 2319), is granted. B The approved ground of appeal is whether the High Court was correct to dismiss Mr Sena’s appeal against conviction brought under s 232(2)(b) of the Criminal Procedure Act 2011. 10 October 2018
District Court judgment	Not publicly available
Judgment appealed from - High Court	[2017] NZHC 2319 25 September 2017_

Case number	SC 61/2018
Case Name	F v The Queen
Summary	Order prohibiting publication of the judgment and any part of the proceedings (including the result) in news media or on the internet or other publicly available database until final disposition of trial. Publication in law report or law digest permitted.
Result	Order prohibiting publication of the judgment and any part of the proceedings (including the result) in news media or on the internet or other publicly available database until final disposition of trial. Publication in law report or law digest permitted. 29 August 2018
District Court judgment	Not publicly available
High Court Judgment	Not publicly available
Judgment appealed from - Court of Appeal	Not publicly available

Case number	SC 65/2018
Case Name	Karl Teangiotau Nuku v The Queen
Summary	Civil Appeal – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in declining the applicant’s request for a transcript of the hearing of his appeal against conviction and sentence in that Court.
Result
High Court Judgment
Judgment appealed from - Court of Appeal	Not publicly available

Case number	SC 66/2018
Case Name	Douglas Craig Schmuck v Opua Coastal Preservation Incorporated and Far North District Council
Summary
Result
High Court Judgment	OPUA COASTAL PRESERVATION INCORPORATED v FAR NORTH DISTRICT COUNCIL [2017] NZHC 154 [14 February 2017]
Judgment appealed from - Court of Appeal	OPUA COASTAL PRESERVATION INCORPORATED v FAR NORTH DISTRICT COUNCIL [2018] NZCA 262 [20 July 2018]

Case number	SC 68/2018
Case Name	Neil Raymond Swain v The Queen
Summary
Result
High Court Judgment	Not publicly available_
Judgment appealed from - Court of Appeal	SWAIN v R [2018] NZCA 259 [19 July 2018]

Case number	SC 69/2018
Case Name	George Whichman v The Queen
Summary
Result
District Court judgment
High Court Judgment
Judgment appealed from - Court of Appeal	Not publicly available

Case number	SC 70/2018
Case Name	H v The Queen
Summary	ORDER PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF THE JUDGMENT AND ANY PART OF THE PROCEEDINGS (INCLUDING THE RESULT) IN NEWS MEDIA OR ON THE INTERNET OR OTHER PUBLICLY AVAILABLE DATABASE UNTIL FINAL DISPOSITION OF TRIAL. PUBLICATION IN LAW REPORT OR LAW DIGEST PERMITTED.
Result	ORDER PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF THE JUDGMENT AND ANY PART OF THE PROCEEDINGS (INCLUDING THE RESULT) IN NEWS MEDIA OR ON THE INTERNET OR OTHER PUBLICLY AVAILABLE DATABASE UNTIL FINAL DISPOSITION OF TRIAL. PUBLICATION IN LAW REPORT OR LAW DIGEST PERMITTED.
High Court Judgment	Not publicly available
Judgment appealed from - Court of Appeal	Not publicly available

Case number	SC 71/2018
Case Name	Quinton Paul Winders v The Queen
Summary
Result
High Court Judgment	R v Winders [2016] NZHC 2964 [9 December 2016]
Judgment appealed from - Court of Appeal	WINDERS v R [2018] NZCA 277 [31 July 2018]

Case number	SC 73/2018
Case Name	Dermont Gregory Nottingham v Auckland District Court, Hemi Taka, Martin Honey and Stephanie Honey
Summary
Result
High Court Judgment	NOTTINGHAM v HONEY [2017] NZHC 2921 [28 November 2017]
Judgment appealed from - Court of Appeal	NOTTINGHAM v District Court at Auckland [2018] NZCA 345 [3 September 2018]_

Case number	SC 74/2018
Case Name	T v The Queen
Summary	ORDER PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF THE JUDGMENT AND ANY PART OF THE PROCEEDINGS (INCLUDING THE RESULT) IN NEWS MEDIA OR ON THE INTERNET OR OTHER PUBLICLY AVAILABLE DATABASE UNTIL FINAL DISPOSITION OF RETRIAL. PUBLICATION IN LAW REPORT OR LAW DIGEST PERMITTED.
Result	ORDER PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF THE JUDGMENT AND ANY PART OF THE PROCEEDINGS (INCLUDING THE RESULT) IN NEWS MEDIA OR ON THE INTERNET OR OTHER PUBLICLY AVAILABLE DATABASE UNTIL FINAL DISPOSITION OF RETRIAL. PUBLICATION IN LAW REPORT OR LAW DIGEST PERMITTED.

Case number	SC 75/2018
Case Name	Hayley Dawn Young v The Attorney General and Ministry of Defence (United Kingdom)
Summary
Result
High Court Judgment	NZLII resource: X v Attorney-General [2017] NZHC 768; [2017] 3 NZLR 115 (24 April 2017)
Judgment appealed from - Court of Appeal	YOUNG v ATTORNEY-GENERAL [2018] NZCA 307 [13 August 2018]

Case number	SC 76 /2018
Case Name	Dermont Gregory Nottingham v District Court at Auckland, Martin Russell Honey, Stephanie Frances Honey and Hemi Taka
Summary
Result
High Court Judgment	NOTTINGHAM v THE AUCKLAND DISTRICT COURT & ORS [2017] NZHC 777 [27 April 2017]
Judgment appealed from - Court of Appeal	NOTTINGHAM v DISTRICT COURT AT AUCKLAND [2018] NZCA 75 [28 March 2018]

Case number	SC 77 /2018
Case Name	O v The Queen
Summary
Result
High Court Judgment	not publicly available
Judgment appealed from - Court of Appeal	not publicly available

Case number	SC 78 /2018
Case Name	Gordon John Rippey v The Queen
Summary
Result
High Court Judgment	not publicly available
Judgment appealed from - Court of Appeal	[2018] NZCA 306 [10 August 2018]_

Case number	SC 79/2018
Case Name	Estall Jhana Glassie
Summary
Result
High Court Judgment	not publicly available
Judgment appealed from - Court of Appeal	GLASSIE v R [2018] NZCA 308 14 August 2018

Case number	SC 80/2018
Case Name	James John Duncan Macfarlane v Perpetual Trust Limited
Summary
Result
High Court Judgment	MACFARLANE v PERPETUAL TRUST LIMITED [2018] NZHC 1055 [15 May 2018]
Judgment appealed from - Court of Appeal	MACFARLANE v PERPETUAL TRUST LTD [2018] NZCA 311 [14 August 2018]

Case number	SC 81/2018
Case Name	Marie Deanne Castle v Whakatane District Council
Summary
Result
High Court Judgment	CASTLE v WHAKATANE DISTRICT COUNCIL [2018] NZHC 1687 [10 July 2018]

Case number	SC 82/2018
Case Name	Toni Colin Reihana v Rakiura Titi Committee, Marama Cooper, Stewart Bull, Ron Bull and Sonia Rakiti
Summary
Result
High Court Judgment	REIHANA v RAKIURA TITI COMMITTEE [2016] NZHC 2048 [31 August 2016]
Judgment appealed from - Court of Appeal	REIHANA v RAKIURA TITI COMMITTEE [2018] NZCA 325 [27 August 2018]

Case number	SC 83/2018
Case Name	Raymond Joseph Tukaki v The Commonwealth of Australia
Summary
Result
High Court Judgment	TUKAKI v THE DISTRICT COURT AT TAURANGA & ANOR [2017] NZHC 843 [31 October 2017]
Judgment appealed from - Court of Appeal	TUKAKI v THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA [2018] NZCA 324 [27 August 2018]

Case number	SC 84/2018
Case Name	Peter Richard Prescott v District Court at North Shore and Malcolm Denmead
Summary
Result
High Court Judgment
Judgment appealed from - Court of Appeal	[2018] NZCA 385_

Case number	SC 85/2018
Case Name	Anthony Donald Grooby v The Queen
Summary	Criminal Appeal – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in holding that the trial Judge was not required to direct the jury on the standard of proof to which propensity evidence must be proved before the jury can consider it in reaching its verdict.
Result
Judgment appealed from - Court of Appeal	GROOBY v R [2018] NZCA 344 [3 September 2018]

Case number	SC 86/2018
Case Name	Shark Experience Limited v Pauamac5 Incorporated, Director-General of Conservation and Shark Dive New Zealand Limited
Summary
Result
High Court Judgment	PAUAMAC5 INCORPORATED v DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF CONSERVATION [2017] NZHC 1182 [2 June 2017]
Judgment appealed from - Court of Appeal	PAUAMAC5 INCORPORATED v DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF CONSERVATION [2018] NZCA 348 [4 September 2018]

Case number	SC 87/2018
Case Name	Robt Jones Holdings Limited v Anthony John McCullagh and Stephen Mark Lawrence liquidators of Northern Crest Investments Limited
Summary
Result
High Court Judgment	MCCULLAGH v ROBT JONES HOLDINGS LIMITED [2017] NZHC 2182 [8 September 2017]
Judgment appealed from - Court of Appeal	ROBT. JONES HOLDINGS LIMITED v MCCULLAGH [2018] NZCA 358 [10 September 2018]

Case number	SC 88/2018
Case Name	P v The Queen
Summary
Result
District Court Judgment	Not publicly available
Judgment appealed from - Court of Appeal	P (CA354/2017) v R [2018] NZCA 361 [11 September 2018]

Case number	SC 89/2018
Case Name	Karl Teangiotau Nuku v The Queen
Summary
Result
High/District Court Judgment	Not publicly available
Judgment appealed from - Court of Appeal	NUKU V R [2016] NZCA 179 [6 May 2016]

Case number	SC 90/2018
Case Name	Dermot Gregory Nottingham v Maltese Cat Limited, Clyde Maclean and Elizabeth Currie
Summary
Result
High Court judgment	MALTESE CAT LIMITED v DOE [2017] NZHC 1634 [14 July 2017]
High Court Judgment	MALTESE CAT LIMITED v JOHN DOE AND/OR JANE DOE [2017] NZHC 1728 [25 July 2017]
Judgment appealed from - Court of Appeal	DERMOT NOTTINGHAM v MALTESE CAT LIMITED [2018] NZCA 387 [24 SEPTEMBER 2017]

Case number	SC 91/2018
Case Name	A v The Queen
Summary
Result
District Court Judgment	Not publicly available
Judgment appealed from - Court of Appeal	Not publicly available

Reserved 4 and 5 September 2018

Reserved 14 and 15 August 2018

Reserved 1 August 2018

Reserved 20 June 2018