Print this page

Peter Gerard Stockman v NZ Asscoiation of Counsellors Incorporated - SC 2/2016

Summary

Civil Appeal – Whether the Court of Appeal should have recalled its judgment ordering standard rather than indemnity costs – Whether judgments must directly refer to all submissions made by parties. [2015] NZCA 542   CA 669/2013

Result

The application for leave to appeal is dismissed.
There is no order for costs.
29 February 2016
_____ 
A The application for recall of the Court’s judgment in Stockman v New Zealand Association of Counsellors Inc [2016] NZSC 18 is dismissed.
B There is no order for costs.
7 April 2016

Related Documents

High Court decision — STOCKMAN v NEW ZEALAND ASSOCIATION OF COUNSELLORS INCORPORATED [2013] NZHC 2267    2 September 2013

Leave judgment - leave dismissed — PETER GERARD STOCKMAN v NEW ZEALAND ASSOCIATION OF COUNSELLORS INCORPORATED  [2016] NZSC 18   29 February 2016 (PDF 69 KB)

Recall judgment — PETER GERARD STOCKMAN v NEW ZEALAND ASSOCIATION OF COUNSELLORS INCORPORATED [2016] NZSC 35    7 April 2016 (PDF 115 KB)

Additional Information

NZCA judgment appealed from 

NZ ASSOC OF COUNSELLORS INC V STOCKMAN [2015] NZCA 629    18 December 2015

NZCA judgment 

NZ ASSOCIATION OF COUNSELLORS INC v STOCKMAN [2015] NZCA 542 12 November 2015