Search Results
Search results for 39
Found 1410 items matching 39.
sc39 2015rosenbergvthequeenleave
sc 39 2013 vikram kumar ors v station properties ltd leave judgment
sc 36 37 39 40 41 42 43 2011 signer and ors v the queen leave application
sc 39 2009 tasman orient line cv v new zealand china clays ltd and ors press relase
Gustav & Co Limited v MacField Limited
Case information | Gustav & Co Limited v MacField Limited SC 39/2007
Supreme Court
Civil appeal – unconscionable bargain – contract for sale of commercial land – sole director of applicant company had a terminal illness – contract cancelled by respondent company when full deposit not paid – applicant company sought to recover partial de…
Tasman Orient Line CV v New Zealand China Clays Limited and Ors
Case information | Tasman Orient Line CV v New Zealand China Clays Limited and Ors SC 39/2009 [2010] NZSC 37
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Decision
Elizabeth Maria Bolea v The King
Case information | Elizabeth Maria Bolea v The King SC 25/2023
Supreme Court
Criminal Appeal
Vivien Judith Madsen-Ries and Henry David Levin as liquidators of Debut Homes Limited and Debut Homes Limited (in liquidation) v Leonard Wayne Cooper and Leonard Wayne Cooper and Tracey Cooper as trustees of the L & T Cooper Family Trust
Case information | Vivien Judith Madsen-Ries and Henry David Levin as liquidators of Debut Homes Limited and Debut Homes Limited (in liquidation) v Leonard Wayne Cooper and Leonard Wayne Cooper and Tracey Cooper as trustees of the L & T Cooper Family Trust SC 29/2019
Supreme Court
Civil Appeal – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in interpreting s 136 of the Companies Act 1993 – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in considering the Respondent’s actions as a director under ss 131 and 135 of the Companies Act 1993.
D v The Queen
Case information | D v The Queen SC 39/2018
Supreme Court
Leave to Appeal
Leave to appeal dismissed
Criminal Appeal – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in partly dismissing the applicant’s appeal against conviction – Whether the trial Judge misdirected the jury – Whether evidence adduced at trial was unfairly prejudicial to the applicant.