T v The Queen
Case information | T v The Queen SC 129/2017
Supreme Court
Criminal Appeal – Evidence Act 2006, ss 8 and 43 – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in overturning a pre-trial ruling that certain propensity evidence was not admissible.
Search results for 43
Found 1451 items matching 43.
Case information | T v The Queen SC 129/2017
Supreme Court
Criminal Appeal – Evidence Act 2006, ss 8 and 43 – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in overturning a pre-trial ruling that certain propensity evidence was not admissible.
Case information | Malcolm Edward Rabson as Trustee of the Malcolm Rabson Family Trust v Ian Bruce Shepherd and Christine Margaret Dunphy SC 1/2017
Supreme Court
Leave to Appeal
Leave to appeal dismissed
Civil Appeal – Court of Appeal (Civil) Rules 2005, r 43(2) – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in declining the application for an extension of time. [2016] NZCA 446 CA51/2016
Case information | Vincent Ross Siemer v The Attorney-General SC 44/2016
Supreme Court
Leave to Appeal
Leave to appeal dismissed
Civil Appeal – Judicature Act 1908, s 88B – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in expanding the scope of the order preventing the applicant from instituting civil proceedings without the leave of the High Court. [2016] NZCA 43 CA278/2014
Case information | Anaru Morgan v The Queen SC 120/2015
Supreme Court
Leave to Appeal
Leave to appeal dismissed
Criminal Appeal – Appeal from the High Court – Propensity evidence – Whether the evidence is properly admissible under s 43 of the Evidence Act 2006. [2015] NZCA 465 CA 405/2015
Case information | Malcolm Edward Rabson v Transparency International New Zealand Incorporated SC 85/2015
Supreme Court
Leave to Appeal
Leave to appeal dismissed
Civil Appeal – Court of Appeal (Civil) Rules 2005, r 43(2) – Whether the Court of Appeal should have granted the application for an extension of time. CA 156/2015
Case information | Janine Davina Sax v Luke Andrew Simpson SC 90/2015
Supreme Court
Leave to Appeal
Leave to appeal dismissed
Civil Appeal – Court of Appeal (Civil) Rules 2005, r 43 – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in dismissing the applicant’s application for an extension of time to file the case on appeal. [2015] NZCA 362 CA 112/2015
Case information | R v The Queen SC 119/2015
Supreme Court
Leave to Appeal
Leave to appeal dismissed
Criminal appeal – Evidence Act 2006, s 43 – Whether propensity evidence was correctly admitted – Whether directions from the trial Judge were sufficient to cure the risk of unfairly prejudicial evidence affecting the jury’s verdicts.[2015] NZCA 394 CA…
Case information | G v The Queen SC 112/2015
Supreme Court
Leave to Appeal
Leave to appeal dismissed
Criminal Appeal – Crimes Act 1961, s 340 – Evidence Act 2006, s 43 – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in concluding that joinder of two sets of charges by two different complainants would not unfairly prejudice the defendant.[2015] NZCA 323 CA 149/2…
Case information | Jeremy James McGuire v The Ministry of Justice SC 139/2014
Supreme Court
Leave to Appeal
Leave to appeal dismissed
Civil Appeal – Court of Appeal (Civil) Rules 2005, r 43 – Whether the Notice of Abandonment issued by the Court of Appeal was wrong and a nullity – Whether the Court of Appeal’s Minute dated 31 July 2014 inviting the applicant to apply for an extension of…
Case information | WDB v The Queen SC 22/2012
Supreme Court
Leave to Appeal
Leave to appeal dismissed
Criminal Appeal – Pre-trial application – Evidence Act 2006, s 43 – Admissibility of propensity evidence – Whether Court of Appeal erred in dismissing appeal against admission of propensity evidence at trial – Probative value of propensity evidence in ide…