James Arthur Rose v Karen Diane Rose
Case information | James Arthur Rose v Karen Diane Rose SC 73/2007 [2009] NZSC 46
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Decision
Search results for Media
Found 1215 items matching Media.
Case information | James Arthur Rose v Karen Diane Rose SC 73/2007 [2009] NZSC 46
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Decision
Case information | Roderick William Nielsen v Dysart Timbers Limited SC 54/2008 [2009] NZSC 43
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Decision
Case information | Deborah Gordon-Smith v The Queen SC 32/2008 [2009] NZSC 20
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Decision
Case information | Mark Moncrieff Stevens and Others v Premium Real Estate Ltd SC 23/2008 [2009] NZSC 15
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Decision
Case information | K v The Queen SC 33/2009 [2009] NZSC 65
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Decision
Case information | Borrowdale v Director-General of Health [2020] NZHC 2090
High Court
Decision of Public Interest
High Court declares the requirement that New Zealanders stay at home for the 9 day period between 26 March and 3 April was justified, but unlawful. All other challenges to legality of early COVID-19 response fail.