Supreme Court case information
Listed below are the substantive Supreme Court cases for the year along with appeals still to be determined or cases awaiting hearing.
Information giving an overview of the case is included along with media releases and links to judgments being appealed when available.
All 2024 - 2014 Supreme Court cases dismissed or deemed to be dismissed where a notice of abandonment was received can be found here.
Transcripts for cases heard before the Supreme Court are included provided they are not suppressed. Transcripts from pre-trial hearings are not published until the final disposition of trial. These are unedited transcripts and they are not a formal record of the Court’s proceedings. The Ministry of Justice does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of any material and recommends that users exercise their own skill and care with respect to its use.
29 April 2024
Case information summary 2024 (as at 26 April 2024) – Cases where leave granted (PDF, 87 KB)
Case information summary 2024 (as at 26 April 2024) – Cases where leave to appeal decision not yet made (PDF, 134 KB)
2015
Case name
Justin Ames Johnston v The Queen
Case number
SC 61/2015
Summary
Criminal Appeal – Whether propensity evidence was correctly admitted at trial – whether there was sufficient evidence to justify the jury’ s conclusion on intention – whether acts and omissions were sufficiently proximate to constitute an attempt. [2015] NZCA 162 CA 58/2014[2012] NZCA 559 CA 262/2012
Result
A The application for leave to appeal is granted (Johnston v R [2015] NZCA 162).
B The approved question is whether the trial Judge was wrong to conclude that the actions of the applicant on the night of the alleged offending were sufficiently proximate to constitute the actus reus of an attempt. 15 October 2015 ____________________ The appeal is dismissed. 6 July 2016
B The approved question is whether the trial Judge was wrong to conclude that the actions of the applicant on the night of the alleged offending were sufficiently proximate to constitute the actus reus of an attempt. 15 October 2015 ____________________ The appeal is dismissed. 6 July 2016
Leave judgment - leave granted
Substantive judgment / Media release
Judgment appealed from
Transcript
Elias CJ, William Young, Glazebrook, Arnold, O’Regan JJ
Case name
Rapata Leef and others as the mandated representatives of the Hapū of Ngāti Taka v Colin Bidois and others as the mandated representatives of the Hapū of Pirirakau
Case number
SC 62/2015
Summary
Civil Appeal – Arbitration Act 1996 – Whether Court of Appeal erred in finding waiver of conflict – Whether Court of Appeal erred in finding there was no process breach by the Arbitration Panel. [2015] NZCA 176 CA 441/2013
Result
A The application for leave to appeal is dismissed.
B The applicants must pay costs of $2,500 to the respondents.
24 August 2015
B The applicants must pay costs of $2,500 to the respondents.
24 August 2015
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
Judgment appealed from
Case name
Sione Fehoko Makanesi v The Queen
Case number
SC 63/2015
Summary
Criminal Appeal – Whether the applicant’s lawyer failed to follow instructions – Whether the applicant’s lawyer should also have appealed against conviction.[2015] NZCA 134 CA 326/2014
Result
Application for leave to appeal dismissed. 21 September 2015
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
Judgment appealed from
Case name
Nicholas Paul Alfred Reekie v Attorney-General and others
Case number
SC 64/2015
Summary
Civil Appeal – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in dismissing the application for extension of time to appeal.[2015] NZCA 198
Result
A The application for leave to appeal is dismissed.
B There is no order as to costs.
29 October 2015
___
The application for recall is dismissed
15 February 2016
B There is no order as to costs.
29 October 2015
___
The application for recall is dismissed
15 February 2016
Recall judgment
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
Case name
Robert George Keen v The Queen
Case number
SC 65/2015
Summary
Criminal Appeal – whether the Court of Appeal erred in dismissing Mr Keen’s appeal against an order for forfeiture made by the District Court under s 32(3) of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1975.[2015] NZCA 221
Result
Application for leave to appeal is dismissed.
13 October 2015
13 October 2015
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
Judgment appealed from
Case name
Susan Marie Heazlewood v Memorial Avenue Investments Limited
Case number
SC 66/2015
Summary
Civil Appeal – Property (Relationships) Act 1976, s 42 – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in holding that the applicant’s notices under s 42 of the Property (Relationship) Act 1976 against the respondent’ s properties were not sustainable. [2015] NZCA 213 SC 644/2014
Result
Notice of abandonment being lodged, the application for leave to appeal is deemed to be dismissed. 13 August 2015
Judgment appealed from
Case name
The Queen v SSC
Case number
SC 67/2015
Summary
Criminal Appeal – Evidence Act 2006, s 30 – Admissions in response to police questioning – Whether exclusion of evidence is proportionate to the police impropriety. [2015] NZCA 241
Result
The application for leave to appeal is granted (C v R [2015] NZCA 241).The approved question is whether the Court of Appeal was right to quash the High Court’s order that the latter part (commencing at 2.14 pm) of the interview between Mr C and the police on 28 March 2014 is admissible at his trial.
31 July 2015
__________________
Judgment released. Details, including result, are suppressed until final disposition of trial.
17 June 2016
31 July 2015
__________________
Judgment released. Details, including result, are suppressed until final disposition of trial.
17 June 2016
Date of hearing
10 December 2015
Judges
Elias CJ, William Young, Glazebrook, Arnold, O’Regan JJ.
Case name
Michael Shane Henry Lihou v The Queen
Case number
SC 68/2015
Summary
Criminal Appeal – Appeal against conviction – Appeal against sentence – Application to present new evidence – Whether counsel presented proper defence at trial. [2015] NZCA 227 CA 646/2013
Result
A The application for leave to appeal against the Court of Appeal pre-trial decision ([2013] NZCA 195) is dismissed.
B The application for leave to appeal against the Court of Appeal conviction decision ([2015] NZCA 227) is also dismissed.
30 October 2015
B The application for leave to appeal against the Court of Appeal conviction decision ([2015] NZCA 227) is also dismissed.
30 October 2015
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
Judgment appealed from
Case name
Rawiri David Lawson v The Queen
Case number
SC 69/2015
Summary
Criminal Appeal – Whether the applicant was unable to instruct counsel or present a defence – Whether the Crown’s presentation of evidence differed from the Crown’s closing – Whether propensity evidence was wrongfully admitted – Whether a charge was withdrawn too late to avoid unfair trial – Whether jury directed to speculate over matters of which there was no evidence of – Whether the evidence was insufficient to convict.[2014] NZCA 463 CA 397/2013
Result
Application for leave to appeal dismissed. 6 October 2015
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
Judgment appealed from
Case name
F v The Queen
Case number
SC 70/2015
Summary
Criminal Appeal – Whether the complainant’s evidential video interview should have been replayed in full during jury deliberations – Whether a demeanour direction needed to be given close in time to the video’ s replaying. [2014] NZCA 229 CA 411/2014
Result
Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
1 September 2015
1 September 2015
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
F (SC 70/2015) v R [2015] NZSC 131 1 September 2015 (PDF, 82 KB)
Judgment appealed from
Page 7 of 15