Commissioner of Inland Revenue v Redcliffe Forestry Venture Limited and others - SC 8/2012
Summary
Civil Appeal – Jurisdiction – High Court Rules, r 5.49 – The respondents sought to set aside a High Court judgment, holding that a forestry investment structure was created for the dominant purpose of tax avoidance and that was upheld by the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court, on the basis that the Commissioner presented a false case to the Court by failing to disclose that another provision of the Income Tax Act 1994 was applicable – This was raised on appeal before the Supreme Court which refused to hear the argument – Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine this proceeding – In the alternative, whether the proceeding should be struck out as an abuse of process.[2011] NZCA 638 CA 152/2010, CA 204/2010
Result
The application for leave to appeal is granted.
The approved questions are:
The approved questions are:
(i) whether the Commissioner’s challenge to the claim was appropriately brought under r 5.49; and
(ii) whether the judgment of the High Court should in any event have been upheld.
29 February 2012
_____________________________
Additional Information
Elias CJ, Tipping, McGrath, William Young, Gault JJ.