Supreme Court case information
Listed below are the substantive Supreme Court cases for the year along with appeals still to be determined or cases awaiting hearing.
Information giving an overview of the case is included along with media releases and links to judgments being appealed when available.
All 2024 - 2014 Supreme Court cases dismissed or deemed to be dismissed where a notice of abandonment was received can be found here.
Transcripts for cases heard before the Supreme Court are included provided they are not suppressed. Transcripts from pre-trial hearings are not published until the final disposition of trial. These are unedited transcripts and they are not a formal record of the Court’s proceedings. The Ministry of Justice does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of any material and recommends that users exercise their own skill and care with respect to its use.
17 July 2026
Case information summary (as at 17 July 2026) – Cases where leave granted (PDF, 87 KB)
Case information summary (as at 17 July 2026) – Cases where leave to appeal decision not yet made (PDF, 128 KB)
All years
Case name
Kimberly Birkenfeld v Anthony Bruce Kendall and Yachting New Zealand Incorporated
Case number
SC 17/2010
Summary
Civil Appeal – Whether the High Court (Access to Court Documents) Amendment Rules 2009 and the Court of Appeal (Access to Court Documents) Rules 2009 are valid; whether the application of those Rules had a prejudicial effect on the preparation of the appellant’s case. [2009] NZCA 619 CA 793/2009
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
Dates
Application for leave to appeal dismissed. No order for costs.
21 April 2010.
Case name
GE Custodians v Bruce Leonard Bartle and Dorothy Judith Bartle and others
Case number
SC 52/2010
Summary
Civil Appeal – Whether the credit contracts entered into by the appellant and the respondents were oppressive in terms of the Credit Contracts and Consumer Finance Act 2003; Whether the Court of Appeal erred in its interpretation of “oppression”; whether it is possible for a contract to be oppressive despite independent legal advice being received: whether knowledge of a third party could be attributed to the appellant in the absence of a relationship of agency.[2010] NZCA 174 CA 627/2009 6 May 2010
Result
Leave to appeal is granted. The approved ground of appeal is whether the credit contracts were oppressive in terms of the Credit Contracts and Consumer Finance Act 2003.
5 August 2010
______________________
The appeal is allowed and the orders made by the Court of Appeal are set aside. The case is remitted to the High Court for determination of issues reserved by that Court for further consideration. The appellant is awarded costs in this Court against the first and second respondents of $25,000 together with its reasonable disbursements to be fixed by the Registrar. The costs order made by the Court of Appeal is reversed.
3 December 2010
5 August 2010
______________________
The appeal is allowed and the orders made by the Court of Appeal are set aside. The case is remitted to the High Court for determination of issues reserved by that Court for further consideration. The appellant is awarded costs in this Court against the first and second respondents of $25,000 together with its reasonable disbursements to be fixed by the Registrar. The costs order made by the Court of Appeal is reversed.
3 December 2010
Transcripts
- Hearing date 20-21 October 2010_SC 52/2010 (PDF, 1.1 MB)
Media Releases
- MR [2010] NZSC 146 (PDF, 86 KB)
Leave judgment - leave granted
Substantive judgment
Case name
John Hillary Corbett v Robert Corbett Western and Bruce Reginald Patterson
Case number
SC 69/2010
Summary
Civil appeal – applicant seeks leave to appeal a refusal by the Court of Appeal to grant leave for the bringing of an appeal to that Court[2010] NZCA 270 25 June 2010
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
Dates
Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
3 August 2010.
Case name
Bruce Benjamin Shepherd v The Queen
Case number
SC 84/2010
Summary
Criminal – appeal against conviction and sentence – applicant was convicted on 20 counts of sexual offending against eight complainants – during re-examination of one complainant the judge intervened to clarify the meaning of an earlier question from counsel for the defence in cross-examination and sought the complainant’s answer – whether the Court of Appeal erred in finding that the questioning did not give rise to a miscarriage of justice – whether the Court of Appeal erred in finding that particular conduct of the applicant’s counsel at trial did not give rise to a miscarriage of justice .[2010] NZCA 351 CA 105/2009 5 August 2010.
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
SHEPHERD v R SC 84/2010 [1 April 2011] (PDF, 10 KB)
Dates
Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
1 April 2011
Case name
Kimberley Birkenfeld v Anthony Bruce Kendall and Yachting New Zealand Inc
Case number
SC 7/2009
Summary
Civil Appeal – damages claim in negligence following boating accident causing physical injury to the applicant – permanent stay ordered in Court of Appeal – whether Court of Appeal failed to consider issues before it – whether Court of Appeal should give reasons in relation to issues that did not need to be decided in order to dismiss the appeal – whether Court of Appeal sufficiently accommodated the applicant’s disabilities.[2008] NZCA 531 CA 570/2007 4 December 2008
Result
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs $2500 to the respondents jointly. 1 July 2009
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
BIRKENFELD v KENDALL SC 7/2009 [1 July 2009] (PDF, 17 KB)
Judgment appealed from
Case name
Janice Mary Menere v Jackson Mews Management Limited
Case number
SC 121/2009
Summary
Civil Appeal – Property Law Act 1952, s 81 – Property Law Act 2007, s 97 – Unit Titles – Mortgages – Whether relevant form of encumbrances can ever be discharged - Whether encumbrances in question ought to be discharged – Whether Court of Appeal was wrong to decide that the rights of the intended appellant to redemption under s 81 of the Property Law Act 1952 had been taken away by the repeal of the Act.[2009] NZCA 563 CA 690/2009 27 November 2009
Result
Application for leave to appeal dismissed. 16 April 2010
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
High Court decision
Judgment appealed from
Case name
Alisdair Bruce Aylwin v New Zealand Police
Case number
SC 33/2008
Summary
Criminal – appeal by way of case stated – whether, on a charge of driving with excess breath alcohol, evidence must be given by the prosecution as to the manner in which the breath screening and/or evidential breath tests were carried out – whether the principle of omnia praesumuntur operates to place an evidentiary burden on the defence to raise this question.[2008] NZCA 154 CA 227/07 6 June 2008
Result
Application for leave to appeal granted.
29 July 2008
__________________________
Appeal dismissed.
19 December 2008
29 July 2008
__________________________
Appeal dismissed.
19 December 2008
Transcripts
- Hearing date 2 December 2008 (PDF, 186 KB)
Media Releases
- sc 33 2008 aylwin v new zealandpolice (PDF, 87 KB)
Leave judgment - leave granted
AYLWIN v R SC 33/2008 [29 July 2008] (PDF, 14 KB)
Substantive judgment
Case name
Paul Bruce Emirali v The Queen
Case number
SC 10/2007
Summary
Criminal – appeal against conviction and sentence – appellant convicted of conspiracy to supply cocaine – whether verdict supportable on the evidence – meaning of “conspiracy” and “supply” – admissibility of evidence –application for leave to appeal out of time. CA 177/06 12 December 2006
Result
Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
2 May 2007
2 May 2007
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
EMIRALI v R SC 10/2007 [2 May 2007] (PDF, 15 KB)
Judgment appealed from
Case name
Transotway Limited v Iain Bruce Shephard and Christine Margaret Dunphy
Case number
SC 39/2005
Summary
Civil appeal - whether the Court of Appeal arred in concluding that the discharge of a debt by way of set-off through provision of a client list to the applicant was "a payment of money" in terms of s 292(1)(e) of the Companies Act 1993 - whether s 310 of the Companies Act which provides for set-off of mutual debts in liquidation was applicable - whether a substance based approach, which considers the transaction in the context of the agreement as a whole, was applied.
CA 98/04 13 June 2005
Result
Leave to appeal granted
31 August 2005
Leave judgment - leave granted
Substantive judgment
Judgment appealed from
Transcript
Case name
Edward Herbert Collingwood and Others v Minister of Internal Affairs, Hamilton City Council and Others.
Case number
SC CIV 15/2004
Summary
Appeal against refusal by Court of Appeal to grant leave to appeal out of time - appeal against further application for leave being struck out as an abuse of process. CA56/01 19 July 2004
Result
Leave to appeal refused. 2 November 2004 PDF 12kb
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
Page 3 of 3