Supreme Court case information
Listed below are the substantive Supreme Court cases for the year along with appeals still to be determined or cases awaiting hearing.
Information giving an overview of the case is included along with media releases and links to judgments being appealed when available.
All 2024 - 2014 Supreme Court cases dismissed or deemed to be dismissed where a notice of abandonment was received can be found here.
Transcripts for cases heard before the Supreme Court are included provided they are not suppressed. Transcripts from pre-trial hearings are not published until the final disposition of trial. These are unedited transcripts and they are not a formal record of the Court’s proceedings. The Ministry of Justice does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of any material and recommends that users exercise their own skill and care with respect to its use.
28 November 2025
Case information summary 2025 (as at 28 November 2025) – Cases where leave granted (PDF, 87 KB)
Case information summary 2025 (as at 28 November 2025) – Cases where leave to appeal decision not yet made (PDF, 120 KB)
All years
Case name
Graham Ashley Robert Palmer.
Case number
SC CRI 13/2004
Summary
Criminal Appeal - appeal against decision of the Court of Appeal to decline leave to withdraw a notice of abandonment of appeal. CA140/04 16 August 2004
Result
Leave to appeal refused. 12 October 2004
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
PALMER V R SC SC CRI 13/2004 [12 October 2004] (PDF, 39 KB)
Judgment appealed from
Case name
Aerengaroa Timoti v The Queen
Case number
SC CRI 14/2004
Summary
Criminal appeal against conviction - Whether, in the circumstances of this case, provocation was available as a partial defence to murder under s167(d) of the Crimes Act - Whether the jury direction on provocation was inadequate, resulting in a miscarriage of justice. CA3/00 25 August 2004 PDF 92kb
Result
Leave to appeal granted.
10 December 2004
________________________
Appeal allowed. Conviction quashed. New Trial ordered.
21 June 2005
10 December 2004
________________________
Appeal allowed. Conviction quashed. New Trial ordered.
21 June 2005
Leave judgment - leave granted
TIMOTI V R SC SC CRI 14/2004 [10 December 2004] (PDF, 11 KB)
Transcript
Substantive judgment
Case name
Yuang Ying Zhang v The Queen
Case number
SC CRI 15/2004
Summary
Appeal against conviction - jurisdiction of the Court of Appeal to hear appeal following guilty plea - whether s19(2)(b) of the Interpretation Act 1999 allows substitution of repealed offences in indictment - whether conspiracy to evade the Fisheries Act 1993 by fraudulent means can amount to a conspiracy under s247 of the Crimes Act 1961 (repealed) where the conduct engaged in is not criminal. - whether R v Walters [1993] 1 NZLR 533 (CA) correct - whether charge related to more than one transaction in breach of s329(6) of the Crimes Act. CA 153/04 13 July 2004
Result
Leave to appeal refused.
3 February 2005
3 February 2005
Transcripts
- SC CRI 15/2004 transcript (PDF, 79 KB)
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
Zhang V R SC SC CRI 15/2004 [3 February 2005] (PDF, 16 KB)
Judgment appealed from
Case name
Jesse Michael Guild
Case number
SC CRI 17/2004
Summary
Criminal appeal against conviction - whether the Court of Appeal erred in its approach to the use of similar fact evidence - whether a substantial miscarriage of justice has occurred. CA84/04 7 April 2004CA210/04 11 October 2004
Result
Leave to appeal dismissed. 2 February 2005
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
GUILD V R SC SC CRI 17/2004 [2 February 2005] (PDF, 15 KB)
Case name
Donald Lyall Trotter
Case number
SC CRI 18/2004
Summary
Criminal appeal - whether sentence of preventive detention should have been imposed - whether substantial miscarriage of justice has occurred as a result. CA253/03 14 October 2003
Result
Leave to appeal dismissed. 3 March 2005
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
TROTTER V R SC SC CRI 18/2004 [3 March 2005] (PDF, 18 KB)
Case name
Christian Paul Clifton
Case number
SC CRI 19/2004
Summary
Criminal appeal against conviction and sentence for conspiracy to import Class B drug, importing a Class B drug, possession of a Class B drug, conspiracy to manufacture a Class B drug, possession of equipment, and possession of a precursor substance - miscarriage of justice alleged on the basis of misdirection by trial judge, time delays by the Court of Appeal in delivering judgment, error by Court of Appeal in failing to give leave to adduce fresh evidence - sentence of 6 years 10 months' imprisonment manifestly excessive. CA398/03 8 November 2004
Result
Leave to appeal dismissed. 17 February 2005
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
CLIFTON V R SC SC CRI 19/2004 [17 February 2005] (PDF, 18 KB)
Judgment appealed from
Case name
Thomas Maxwell Clark v The Queen
Case number
SC CRI 20/2004
Summary
Criminal appeal against pre-trial ruling - whether Judge erred in declining to order severance of two counts of sexual offending - whether the evidence of mutual compaints sufficiently qualified as similar fact evidence - what the appropriate test for admission of similar fact evidence should be - whether the issue of possible collusion between the two complainants should have been explored on a voir dire before trial. CA 306/04 6 December 2004
Result
Application for leave dismissed. 10 May 2005
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
CLARK V R SC CRI 20/2004 [10 May 2005] (PDF, 39 KB)
Transcript
Case name
Peter Francis Urbani v Gillions and Sons Limited
Case number
SC 2/2004
Summary
Civil appeal - standard to be applied by Court of Appeal in appeals from findings of fact whether the Court of Appeal should evaluate the relevant evidence and reach and express its own conclusions. CA 56/03 1 April 2004
Result
Leave to appeal refused.
15 July 2004
_________________________
Decision on costs.
17 August 2004
15 July 2004
_________________________
Decision on costs.
17 August 2004
Transcripts
- Hearing date 13 July 2004 (PDF, 111 KB)
Court of Appeal decision
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
Additional document
Case name
Westfield (New Zealand) Limited and Northcote Mainstreet Incorporated v North Shore City Council and Discount Brands Limited
Case number
SC 4/2004 SC CIV 4/2004
Summary
Civil appeal - resource management - application for consent for non-complying activity - whether a decision to proceed on a non-notified basis is extraordinary - whether the correct standard of review of such a decision is to be in accordance with traditional Wednesbury principles - whether the cautionary approach discussed in Bayley v Manukau City Council (1999) NZLR 568 should be adopted in non-notification decisions - whether there was sufficient material before the Commissioners to enable them to conclude that the effects of the application would be more than de minimis. CA 30/04 14 June 2004.
Result
6 October 2004 Elias CJ; Tipping J Leave to appeal granted.
6 October 2004
________________________________
The appeal is allowed. The order of the High Court is restored. The decisions made by the North Shore City Council (a) on 25 July 2003 not to require notification of the second respondent's resource consent application and (b) on 21 August 2003 granting that application are set aside. Costs in favour of the appellants are to be fixed by the Court following receipt of written submissions.
19 April 2005
6 October 2004
________________________________
The appeal is allowed. The order of the High Court is restored. The decisions made by the North Shore City Council (a) on 25 July 2003 not to require notification of the second respondent's resource consent application and (b) on 21 August 2003 granting that application are set aside. Costs in favour of the appellants are to be fixed by the Court following receipt of written submissions.
19 April 2005
Transcripts
- Hearing date 6 - 8 December 2004 (PDF, 685 KB)
Court of Appeal decision
Leave judgment - leave granted
Substantive judgment
Case name
Richard Prebble and Ken Shirley v Donna Awatere Huata
Case number
SC 9/2004 SC CIV 9/2004
Summary
Whether distortion of "the proportionality of political party representation in Parliament" in terms of s55D of the Electoral Act 1993 was properly limited to conduct which alters a party's relative voting strength through defection - whether the belief of the leaders of the Act party that Huata had acted so as to distort the proportionality of Parliament was a reasonable one - whether, and to what extent, the scope of judicial review is limited in the context of ss55A-55D of the Act. CA34/04 16 July 2004
Result
Leave to appeal granted.
25 August 2004
_________________
A Appeal allowed
B Order of the Court of Appeal prohibiting delivery of the proposed notice to the Speaker of the House of Representatives is discharged.
C Appellant entitled to costs in this and the lower courts.
18 November 2004
________________________
Costs to appellant in the sum of $15,000, together with disbursements of $2,000.
19 April 2005
25 August 2004
_________________
A Appeal allowed
B Order of the Court of Appeal prohibiting delivery of the proposed notice to the Speaker of the House of Representatives is discharged.
C Appellant entitled to costs in this and the lower courts.
18 November 2004
________________________
Costs to appellant in the sum of $15,000, together with disbursements of $2,000.
19 April 2005
Transcripts
- Hearing 5 October 2004 (PDF, 305 KB)
Court of Appeal decision
Leave judgment - leave granted
Substantive judgment
Additional document
Page 269 of 270