Desmond James Albert Conway v Mercedes-Benz Financial Services New Zealand Limited - SC 119/2017

Summary

Civil Appeal – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in its interpretation and application of the Personal Property Securities Act 1999 and the Property Law Act 2007 – Whether the applicant was mortgagor of vehicles repossessed by the respondent.

Result

A The application for leave to appeal is dismissed.
B The applicant must pay costs of $2,500 to the respondent.
23 February 2018

Related Documents

High Court decision — MERCEDES-BENZ FINANCIAL SERVICES NZ LTD v CONWAY [2015] NZHC 315 [27 February 2015]

High Court decision — MERCEDES-BENZ FINANCIAL SERVICES NEW ZEALAND LTD v CONWAY [2016] NZHC 1587 [13 July 2016]

High Court decision — MERCEDES-BENZ FINANCIAL SERVICES NEW ZEALAND LIMITED v CONWAY [2016] NZHC 1896 [16 August 2016]

Leave judgment - leave dismissed — DESMOND JAMES ALBERT CONWAY v MERCEDES-BENZ FINANCIAL SERVICES NEW ZEALAND LIMITED [2018] NZSC 16 [23 February 2018] (PDF 195 KB)

Additional Information

Judgment appealed from

CONWAY V MERCEDES-BENZ FINANCIAL SERVICES NEW ZEALAND LIMITED [2017] NZCA 463 [17 October 2017]