Print this page

Philip Claude Tarr v Douglas John Sutcliffe and Terence Sutcliffe and Braden Matson as partners of Frost & Sutcliffe Lawyers - SC 46/2018

Summary

Civil Appeal – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in striking out the applicant’s claim as an abuse of process.

Result

A  The application for leave to appeal is dismissed.
B  Costs of $2,500 are awarded to the respondents.
31 July 2018

Related Documents

High Court decision — Tarr v Tarr[2014] NZHC 1450

Court of Appeal decision — Sutcliffe & Tarr [2018] NZCA 135

Leave judgment - leave dismissed — PHILIP CLAUDE TARR v DOUGLAS JOHN SUTCLIFFE [2018] NZSC 66 [31 July 2018] (PDF 245 KB)