Rapata Leef and others as the mandated representatives of the Hapū of Ngāti Taka v Colin Bidois and others as the mandated representatives of the Hapū of Pirirakau - SC 62/2015
Summary
Civil Appeal – Arbitration Act 1996 – Whether Court of Appeal erred in finding waiver of conflict – Whether Court of Appeal erred in finding there was no process breach by the Arbitration Panel. [2015] NZCA 176 CA 441/2013
Result
A The application for leave to appeal is dismissed.
B The applicants must pay costs of $2,500 to the respondents.
24 August 2015
B The applicants must pay costs of $2,500 to the respondents.
24 August 2015
Related Documents
Leave judgment - leave dismissed — RAPATA (ROBERT) LEEF, STEPHANIE TERIA TAIAPA, NADINE HORINA PIRAKE, CAINE RAROATAIAPA, DARREN WILLIAM LEEF, NEIL HIRAMA AND PANIA ANEISHA BROWN v COLIN BIDOIS, JENNY ROLLESTON, TAARI NICHOLAS, PATRICK NICHOLAS, CHRIS (KIRITOHA) TANGITU, RAWIRI KUKA AND (PDF 90 KB)
Additional Information
BIDOIS & ORS v LEEF & ORS CA 441/2013 [2015] NZCA 176 18 May 2015