Supreme Court case information
Listed below are the substantive Supreme Court cases for the year along with appeals still to be determined or cases awaiting hearing.
Information giving an overview of the case is included along with media releases and links to judgments being appealed when available.
All 2024 - 2014 Supreme Court cases dismissed or deemed to be dismissed where a notice of abandonment was received can be found here.
Transcripts for cases heard before the Supreme Court are included provided they are not suppressed. Transcripts from pre-trial hearings are not published until the final disposition of trial. These are unedited transcripts and they are not a formal record of the Court’s proceedings. The Ministry of Justice does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of any material and recommends that users exercise their own skill and care with respect to its use.
22 September 2026
Case information summary (as at 18 September 2026) – Cases where leave granted (PDF, 112 KB)
Case information summary (as at 18 September 2026) – Currently unavailable
All years
Case name
Christopher John Manawatu v The Queen
Case number
SC 92/2006
Summary
Criminal – applicant convicted of aggravated robbery and driving while disqualified – applicant convicted in separate proceeding of three counts of manslaughter, and one charge each of reckless driving and excess blood alcohol – no appeal against conviction or sentence – whether s 398 Crimes Act infringes ss 14, 25(a) and 25(h) New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 or Articles 14(1), 19(2) and 26 of ICCPR – whether s 398 discriminates against criminal appellants, there being no equivalent provision applying to civil cases – whether Court of Appeal should have disclosed to counsel prior to the hearing that s 398(1) is in the process of being repealed - whether Court of Appeal should have made Declaration of Inconsistency of s 398 with BORA - whether undue appellate delay – whether there should be a reduction in sentence by reason of appellate delay. CA 111/05 CA 112/05 10 November 2006
Result
Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
8 March 2007
8 March 2007
Court of Appeal decision
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
Case name
John Anthony Reid v The Queen
Case number
SC 95/2006
Summary
Criminal – Costs in Criminal Cases Act 1967 – trial Judge awarded costs to defendants acquitted on charges of conspiracy to defraud and money laundering brought by Serious Fraud Office – Court of Appeal majority held that High Court Judge had erred in failing to take account of risk of a substantial award inhibiting the exercise of proper prosecutorial function – whether the Court of Appeal erred in setting aside the cost award because it was “disproportionate” – whether Court of Appeal wrongly interpreted s 5(1) of the Act. CA 474/06 6 December 2006
Result
Application for leave to appeal granted. 29 May 2007 ____________ Appeal allowed, Costs order in the High Court reinstated.
Costs to appellant in Court of Appeal, $12,000 together ith reasonable expenses.
Costs to appellant in Supreme Court, $20,000 together with reasonable expenses. 14 November 2007
Costs to appellant in Court of Appeal, $12,000 together ith reasonable expenses.
Costs to appellant in Supreme Court, $20,000 together with reasonable expenses. 14 November 2007
Leave judgment - leave granted
REID And Ors V R SC 95/2006 [29 May 2007] (PDF, 17 KB)
Hearing
10 and 11 October 2007_note SC3/2007
Substantive judgment / Media release
Case name
Bernard John Pavitt v The Queen
Case number
SC 7/2005
Summary
Criminal appeal against conviction for aggravated robbery - whether colour of right - whether evidence inadmissable as unfairly obtained - burden of proof - whether misdirection by trial judge in telling jury that two others involved in the offending had also been charged. CA 257/04 21 October 2004
Result
Leave to appeal refused.
10 May 2005
10 May 2005
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
PAVITT V R SC 7/2005 [10 May 2005] (PDF, 15 KB)
Case name
Roger John Payne v Jeanette Rosslyn Payne
Case number
SC 8/2005
Summary
Matrimonial property division - order for sale of property to enforce earlier High Court orders for payments by the appellant to the respondent - appeal from decision of the Court of Appeal dismissing an application for a stay of orders for the sale of the appellant's house - whether payment by the appellant in the amount of the value of a half share in the marital home entitles the appellant to the immediate transfer to him of that interest - whether the Court should exercise its residual power to reopen the appellant's litigation. CA 257/04 21 October 2004
Result
Leave to appeal refused.
The stay order made by this Court on 11 March 2005 is set aside.
18 March 2005
The stay order made by this Court on 11 March 2005 is set aside.
18 March 2005
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
Case name
James Alfred Hood, Robert George Hood, Kenneth John Hood v The Attorney-General and The Queenstown Lakes District Council
Case number
SC 11/2005
Summary
Civil appeal - land compulsorily acquired for public works no longer required - whether unreasonable or unfair to offer land back under s 40(2) Public Works Act 1981 - decision made by Minister other than the Minister empowered by statute - whether decision validated by s 25(e) Acts Interpretation Act 1924. CA 257/04 21 October 2004
Result
Leave to appeal declined. Costs to respondents $2,500 together with disbursements as settled by the Registrar.
5 August 2005
5 August 2005
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
Judgment appealed from
Transcript
Case name
David John Young v Land Transport Safety Authority
Case number
SC 33/2005
Summary
Criminal appeal - appeal against the decision of the High Court - leave to appeal refused by the Court of Appeal - whether defence of self-defence correctly applied to facts. CRI 2004 409 000196, 29 November 2004
Result
Leave to appeal dismissed. 27 July 2005
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
Judgment appealed from
Case name
Body Corporate No 164980 v Paul John Velich
Case number
SC 37/2005
Summary
Unit Titles Act 1972 - Whether a body corporate rule which replaces a default rule under the Act is ultra vires when it appreciably expands the existing powers and duties of the Body Corporate - What the proper test is for determining whether or not any particular rule is "incidental to existing powers or duties" - Whether the replacement rule in fact "appreciably" expanded the powers given to the Body Corporate under the existing default rule. CA 116/04 19 May 2005
Result
Notice of abandonment of application being lodged, the application is deemed to be dismissed. 15 July 2005
Judgment appealed from
Case name
Roger John Payne v Jeanette Rosslyn Payne
Case number
SC 46/2005
Summary
Application for injunction to prevent sale of house - whether abuse of process . CA 239/04 CA 63/05 25 May 2005
Result
Application for leave to appeal dismissed 28 July 2005
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
PAYNE V PAYNE SC 46/2005 [28 July 2005] (PDF, 15 KB)
Judgment appealed from
Case name
Klaus Löwer v Gary Traveller and John Anthony Waller
Case number
SC 51/2005
Summary
Company Law - whether the respondents had an accrued cause of action for reckless trading giving them an "existing right" under s320(1)(b) of the Companies Act - whether the applicant was in breach of s320(1)(b) Companies Act 1955 - whether the Court of Appeal erred in its application of ss17-19 Interpretation Act 1999 .
CA 36/04 26 July 2005
Result
Leave to appeal granted.
2 December 2005
Leave judgment - leave granted
Transcript
Judgment appealed from
Case name
John Patrick Round v The Queen
Case number
SC 59/2005
Summary
Criminal - whether counsel's alleged failures in cross-examination of the complainant, and not forcefully advising the applicant to give evidence led to a real risk of an unsafe verdict. CA 125/05 29 August 2005
Result
Leave to appeal dismissed. 24 November 2005
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
ROUND v R SC 59/2005 [24 November 2005] (PDF, 15 KB)
Judgment appealed from
Page 50 of 51