Supreme Court case information
Listed below are the substantive Supreme Court cases for the year along with appeals still to be determined or cases awaiting hearing.
Information giving an overview of the case is included along with media releases and links to judgments being appealed when available.
All 2024 - 2014 Supreme Court cases dismissed or deemed to be dismissed where a notice of abandonment was received can be found here.
Transcripts for cases heard before the Supreme Court are included provided they are not suppressed. Transcripts from pre-trial hearings are not published until the final disposition of trial. These are unedited transcripts and they are not a formal record of the Court’s proceedings. The Ministry of Justice does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of any material and recommends that users exercise their own skill and care with respect to its use.
19 June 2026
Case information summary (as at 19 June 2026) – Cases where leave granted (PDF, 89 KB)
Case information summary (as at 19 June 2026) – Cases where leave to appeal decision not yet made (PDF, 126 KB)
All years
Case name
Te Ingoa Turaki v The Queen
Case number
SC 12/2009
Summary
Criminal - Whether trial judge erred in summing up to jury by not properly putting the appellant’s principal defence “lack of murderous intent” adequately before the jury – Whether failure to sum up amounted to a miscarriage of justice.{2008] NZCA 543 CA 669/2007 10 December 2008
Result
Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
9 March 2009
9 March 2009
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
TURAKI v R SC 12/2009 [9 March 2009] (PDF, 15 KB)
Judgment appealed from
Case name
Audrey Bredmeyer v The Chief Executive of the Ministry of Social Development
Case number
SC 14/2009
Summary
Civil appeal - New Zealander living in Australia seeks payment of New Zealand superannuation – whether Article 9.3 of the Agreement on Social Security, Schedule 1 Social Welfare (Reciprocity with Australia) Order makes payment of New Zealand superannuation contingent on meeting the income test and asset test for Australian pensions – whether the social purpose behind the current Agreement on Social Security between New Zealand and Australia differs from previous agreements - whether the Court of Appeal accorded natural justice to the Appellant.[2008] NZCA 557 CA 666/2007 17 December 2008
Result
Application for leave to appeal dismissed. Costs $2,500 to respondent.
30 March 2009
30 March 2009
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
Case name
Darin Joseph Gardner v The Queen
Case number
SC 31/2009
Summary
Criminal appeal – Applicant convicted of murder, injuring with intent to cause grievous bodily harm and injuring with intent to injure – Appeal against conviction and sentence – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in finding that the applicant’s trial was fair – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in finding that the discharge of only one juror in certain circumstances, rather than two, was fair – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in finding that provocation was not available as a defence – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in finding that provocation and defence of another were not material in the applicant’s sentencing.[2009] NZCA 113 CA 665/07
Result
Application for leave to appeal dismissed. 16 June 2009
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
GARDNER V R SC 31/2009 16 June 2009 (PDF, 13 KB)
Case name
K v The Queen
Case number
SC 33/2009
Summary
Criminal appeal – convictions for sexual offending and assault – appeal based on conduct of defence counsel and alleged deficiencies in the trial process - whether the Court of Appeal erred in applying R v Condon [2005] 1 NZLR 446 – whether the appellant was denied the right to a fair trial – whether the appellant was denied the right to legal representation – whether the trial judge erred in accepting the report of a forensic nurse and finding the appellant was competent to instruct counsel[2009] NZCA 97 CA 531/07
Result
Application for leave to appeal refused.
19 June 2009
19 June 2009
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
K V R SC 33/2009 19 June 2009 (PDF, 15 KB)
Case name
Vincent Ross Siemer v Solicitor-General
Case number
SC 48/2009
Summary
Civil/Criminal Appeal – Offences – Contempt of Court – New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 – Appeal against decision committing appellant to prison for contempt – Whether Court of Appeal erred in holding contempt proceedings civil in nature – Whether appellant wrongly denied opportunity to elect trial by jury.[2009] NZCA 62 CA 447/2008 9 March 2009
Result
Application for leave to appeal granted.
7 August 2009
______________________
The appeal is allowed and the order made by the Court of Appeal is quashed. It is replaced by an order committing the appellant to prison for a term of a maximum of three months, subject to the proviso that the term of imprisonment will come to an immediate end if the appellant complies with the injunction issued on 5 May 2005 and made permanent on 23 December 2008 by the High Court at Auckland in the proceeding Korda Mentha v Siemer HC Auckland CIV-2005-404-1808, 23 December 2008 and if he also provides an undertaking to the High Court in a form approved by the High Court that he and Paragon Oil Services Ltd will continue to comply with that injunction for so long as it remains in force. Mr Siemer is ordered to surrender to his bail at the High Court in Auckland no later than 4pm on 20 May 2010 unless by then he has complied with the injunction and provided that undertaking to the High Court in a form approved by it.
17 May 2010
____________________________
Application for recall of judgment dismissed.
11 June 2010
_____________________________
Further application for recall of judgment dismissed.
15 June 2010
7 August 2009
______________________
The appeal is allowed and the order made by the Court of Appeal is quashed. It is replaced by an order committing the appellant to prison for a term of a maximum of three months, subject to the proviso that the term of imprisonment will come to an immediate end if the appellant complies with the injunction issued on 5 May 2005 and made permanent on 23 December 2008 by the High Court at Auckland in the proceeding Korda Mentha v Siemer HC Auckland CIV-2005-404-1808, 23 December 2008 and if he also provides an undertaking to the High Court in a form approved by the High Court that he and Paragon Oil Services Ltd will continue to comply with that injunction for so long as it remains in force. Mr Siemer is ordered to surrender to his bail at the High Court in Auckland no later than 4pm on 20 May 2010 unless by then he has complied with the injunction and provided that undertaking to the High Court in a form approved by it.
17 May 2010
____________________________
Application for recall of judgment dismissed.
11 June 2010
_____________________________
Further application for recall of judgment dismissed.
15 June 2010
Leave judgment - leave granted
Substantive judgment
SIEMER v SOLICITOR-GENERAL SC 48/2009 [17 May 2010] (PDF, 159 KB)
Transcript
Hearing date : recusal 26 February 2017
Elias CJ, Blanchard, McGrath, Wilson, Anderson JJ
Case Number
SC 48/2009
Case name
RB v The Queen
Case number
SC 50/2009
Summary
Criminal – Wounding with intent to injure – Whether a defence of consent available - Whether the Court of Appeal erred in ordering a retrial after quashing the appellant’s convictions, given the factual findings made by the District Court Judge – Whether a retrial would result in a substantial miscarriage of justice, having regard to events which have occurred after the Court of Appeal judgment[2009] NZCA 186 CA 733/2008 15 May 2008
Result
Notice of Abandonment of Appeal being lodged, the application is deemed to be dismissed. 7 July 2009
Case name
Lipene Sila v The Queen
Case number
SC 58/2009
Summary
Criminal – Appeal against murder convictions – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in finding that the Trial Judge was correct to not allow self-defence to be put to the jury.[2009] NZCA 233 CA 404/2008 5 June 2009
Result
Application for leave to appeal dismissed. 10 August 2009
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
Case name
Victor Stojanovich v The Queen
Case number
SC 62/2009
Summary
Criminal appeal – convictions for sexual violations by rape and unlawful sexual connection – appeal based on conduct of defence counsel and alleged deficiencies in the trial process – whether the appellant was denied the right to a fair trial – whether the Court of Appeal erred in finding that the failure of trial counsel to cross-examine the complainant on inconsistencies between her evidence at trial, her statement to the Police and evidence at first trial did not amount to a miscarriage of justice – whether the Court of Appeal erred in finding that the trial judge’s direction on consent did not amount to a miscarriage of justice.[2009] NZCA 210 CA 427/2008 27 May 2009
Result
Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
27 August 2009
27 August 2009
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
STOJANOVICH V R SC 62/2009 27 August 2009 (PDF, 12 KB)
Case name
Philip Wayne Hart v The Queen
Case number
SC 74/2009
Summary
Criminal appeal – appeal against conviction – convictions for sexual offending – the trial judge acceded to an application by the Crown for a prior consistent statement of the complainant to be admitted in terms of s 35(2) of the Evidence Act 2006 to rebut the assertion that the complainant’s evidence was fabricated in order to entitle her to ACC – whether the Court of Appeal erred in determining that defence counsel asserted recent invention on the part of the complainant and thus attacked the complainant’s veracity, opening the way to evidence on that topic under s 37 and also justifying an application by the Crown for an order that the complainant’s prior consistent statement was admissible under s 35(2) – whether the Court of Appeal erred in determining that the trial judge did not need to direct the jury on its use of the prior consistent statement because such statements, once admitted, are admissible for the truth of their contents under the Evidence Act 2006.[2009] NZCA 276 CA 609/2008 29 June 2009
Result
Application for leave to appeal granted.
15 October 2009
_______________________________
Appeal dismissed.
23 July 2010
15 October 2009
_______________________________
Appeal dismissed.
23 July 2010
Transcripts
- Hearing date 18 November 2009 SC 74/2009 (PDF, 338 KB)
Media Releases
- MR [2010] NZSC 91 (PDF, 81 KB)
Leave judgment - leave granted
HART v R SC 74/2009 [15 October 2009] (PDF, 6 KB)
Substantive judgment
HART v R SC 74/2009 [23 July 2010] (PDF, 210 KB)
Case name
Moncello David Shirley v The Queen
Case number
SC 101/2009
Summary
Criminal appeal – convictions for wounding with intent, aggravated burglary and possession of a knife – whether the Court of Appeal erred in rejecting the possibility of self-defence and provocation – whether the Court of Appeal gave insufficient weight to supplementary reports which indicated that certain of the appellant’s characteristics should have been seen as mitigating factors in sentencing – whether the Court of Appeal erred in failing to consider the possible application of section 9 of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990, given the applicant’s history and experiences in prison.[2009] NZCA 509 CA 57/2009 23 October 2009
Result
Application for leave to appeal dismissed. 5 March 2010
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
SHIRLEY v R SC 101/2009 [5 March 2010] (PDF, 29 KB)
Judgment appealed from
Page 19 of 24