Supreme Court case information
Listed below are the substantive Supreme Court cases for the year along with appeals still to be determined or cases awaiting hearing.
Information giving an overview of the case is included along with media releases and links to judgments being appealed when available.
All 2024 - 2014 Supreme Court cases dismissed or deemed to be dismissed where a notice of abandonment was received can be found here.
Transcripts for cases heard before the Supreme Court are included provided they are not suppressed. Transcripts from pre-trial hearings are not published until the final disposition of trial. These are unedited transcripts and they are not a formal record of the Court’s proceedings. The Ministry of Justice does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of any material and recommends that users exercise their own skill and care with respect to its use.
19 June 2026
Case information summary (as at 19 June 2026) – Cases where leave granted (PDF, 89 KB)
Case information summary (as at 19 June 2026) – Cases where leave to appeal decision not yet made (PDF, 126 KB)
All years
Case name
FP v The Queen
Case number
SC 18/2007
Summary
S ummary Criminal – appeal against conviction and sentence – applicant pleaded guilty in the High Court to seven counts of sexual offending against young girls – whether leave should have been granted for a change of plea – whether language difficulties resulted in a miscarriage of justice – application for leave to appeal out of time.CA 205/05 22 November 2005
Result
Application for leave to appeal dismissed. 13 June 2007
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
F v R SC 18/2007 [13 June 2007] (PDF, 14 KB)
Judgment appealed from
Case name
Samuel Tahatu Marsh v The Queen
Case number
SC 19/2007
Summary
Criminal – appeal against conviction and sentence – applicant convicted of discharging an airgun in or near a dwellinghouse or public place (s 48 Arms Act 1983) – whether leave should be granted on a direct appeal from the High Court under s 14 Supreme Court Act 2003 – whether Police search of private bedroom was an unreasonable search and seizure contrary to s 21 New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990, where the Bill of Rights issue was not raised in the Courts below – application for leave to appeal out of time. CRI 2006 419 90 21 November 2006
Result
Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
25 June 2007
25 June 2007
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
MARSH v NEW ZEALAND POLICE SC 19/2007 [25 June 2007] (PDF, 15 KB)
Case name
Austin, Nichols & Co. Inc v Stichting Lodestar
Case number
SC 21/2007
Summary
Civil appeal – Trade Marks Act 1953 – whether, in hearing an appeal from the Assistant Commissioner of Trade Marks, the High Court must have deference to the Assistant Commission’s findings, only overturning a decision that can fairly be characterised as wrong – whether the Court of Appeal erred in its interpretation of its own powers under the Court of Appeal (Civil) Rules 2005 in determining the appeal from the High Court decision – whether the Court of Appeal erred by ignoring the onus on the trade mark applicant to discharge the burden of demonstrating that registration of its trade mark would not lead to a likelihood of confusion or deception. CA 94/05 12 March 2007
Result
Application for leave to appeal granted.
7 June 2007
______________________________
Appeal dismissed. Costs $7,5000 plus disbursements to the respondent.
7 June 2007
______________________________
Appeal dismissed. Costs $7,5000 plus disbursements to the respondent.
Transcripts
- Hearing date 17 October 2007 (PDF, 244 KB)
Media Releases
- MR [2007] NZSC 103 (PDF, 88 KB)
Court of Appeal decision
Leave judgment - leave granted
Substantive judgment
Case name
Z v Dental Complaints Assessment Committee
Case number
SC 22/2007
Summary
Civil – Whether the Court of Appeal erred when it concluded that in dental disciplinary proceedings, where the subject of the charge amounts to an allegation of a criminal offence, the civil standard of proof should be applied – whether the Court of Appeal erred by concluding that where the charge is a serious one there is no real distinction between the civil and criminal standards of proof – whether the Court of Appeal erred in concluding that it would not be an abuse of process for the appellant to face a disciplinary charge which repeats the criminal allegations for which he was acquitted. CA 231/05 22 March 2007
Result
Application for leave to appeal granted
22 June 2007
______________________
The appeal is allowed to the extent that the allegation of professional misconduct in 1987 is not to form part of the charge heard by the Tribunal.
In all other respects the appeal is dismissed.
The appellant is to pay costs to the respondent of $10,000, together with reasonable disbursements to be fixed if necessary by the Registrar.
25 July 2008
22 June 2007
______________________
The appeal is allowed to the extent that the allegation of professional misconduct in 1987 is not to form part of the charge heard by the Tribunal.
In all other respects the appeal is dismissed.
The appellant is to pay costs to the respondent of $10,000, together with reasonable disbursements to be fixed if necessary by the Registrar.
25 July 2008
Media Releases
Leave judgment - leave granted
Substantive judgment
Judgment appealed from
Case name
Waitara Leaseholders Association Inc v New Plymouth District Council
Case number
SC 23/2007
Summary
Civil –Whether the Court of Appeal erred in concluding that land was not held on a charitable trust and that the Council was not subject to the obligations of charitable trustees – whether the Court of Appeal erred in finding the Council was not obliged to consider the objects of the statutory trusts when deciding to seek legislation to remove trust restrictions – whether the Court of Appeal erred in finding that compliance with section 14(6) of the Trustee Act 1956 relieves a trustee from its obligation of obtaining the best price for an asset – whether the Supreme Court should grant leave to pursue a new ground, namely that the Council failed to take into account the fact that its decisions were contrary to previous promises and assurances that it had made.CA 259/05 CA 260/05 20 March 2007
Result
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs $2,500 to the respondent.
20 June 2007
20 June 2007
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
Case name
Kurt John Owen v The Queen
Case number
SC 25/2007
Summary
Criminal – appeal against conviction – whether discretion to consider appeals on the basis of unreasonable verdicts has been unduly restricted – complaint about the adequacy of summing up by trial judge – emotive summing up by prosecution – direction by trial judge concerning prosecution’s comment on the right to silence – trial judge’ s use of the transcript – whether Court of Appeal was correct to hold that overall there was no miscarriage of justice.CA 342/06 21 March 2007
Result
Application for leave to appeal granted.
29 June 2006
________________________
Appeal dismissed.
11 December 2007
29 June 2006
________________________
Appeal dismissed.
11 December 2007
Media Releases
- mediarelease owen (PDF, 87 KB)
Leave judgment - leave granted
Substantive judgment
OWEN V R SC 25/2007 [11 December 2007] (PDF, 57 KB)
Transcript
Substantive judgment / Media release
Judgment appealed from
Case name
Robert Erwood v Janet Maxted and others
Case number
SC 27/2007
Summary
Civil – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in refusing to grant the applicant an extension of time – whether the applicant’s personal circumstances are such that an application should be granted. CA 342/06 30 April 2007
Result
Application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs of $2.500 for the respondents. Stay of execution revoked.
31 May 2007
31 May 2007
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
Judgment appealed from
Case name
Dollars and Sense Finance Limited v Rerekohu Nathan
Case number
SC 31/2007
Summary
Summary Civil appeal – enforceability of a registered mortgage – borrower forged the signature of one of the sureties, his mother, on the mortgage documents – lender’s solicitor had delivered the mortgage documents to the borrower to procure the signatures and express informed consent of the sureties – whether the borrower was the agent of the lender – whether the borrower’s fraud can be attributed to the lender – whether the surety has an in personam claim against the lender. CA 107/05 4 May 2007
Result
Application for leave to appeal granted.
29 June 2007
______________________
Appeal dismissed with costs of $15,000 and reasonable disbursements to the respondent.
8 April 2008
29 June 2007
______________________
Appeal dismissed with costs of $15,000 and reasonable disbursements to the respondent.
8 April 2008
Leave judgment - leave granted
Judgment appealed from
Transcript
Substantive judgment / Media release
Case name
Harvey Douglas White v Auckland District Health Board
Case number
SC 37/2007
Summary
Civil Appeal – leap frog appeal against decision of the Employment Court after the Court of Appeal declined leave to appeal - whether the Employment Court erred in law when it declined to grant a permanent non-publication order in relation to the applicant’s name – whether the Court considered matters for which there was no evidential basis and failed to consider relevant matters – whether the Court erred when it concluded that the applicant had brought the public consequences upon himself – whether the Court failed to ensure that it had up to date information AC 10/7 ARC 52/05 23 February 2007
Result
Application for leave to appeal dismissed. Order preventing publication of the applicants name is lifted. Costs to respondent $2,5000 plus disbursements.
8 August 2007
8 August 2007
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
Case name
Gregory Nielsen and Roderick William Nielsen v Dysart Timbers Limited
Case number
SC 38/2007
Summary
Civil appeal – interpretation of clause in deed of purchase of debt – whether deed extended to companies or entities other than those expressly mentioned in the deed.CA 253/05 22 May 2007
Result
Application for leave to appeal granted.
9 August 2007
_________________________
Notice of abandonment being lodged, the appeal is deemed to be dismissed.
3 June 2009
9 August 2007
_________________________
Notice of abandonment being lodged, the appeal is deemed to be dismissed.
3 June 2009
Leave judgment - leave granted
Judgment appealed from
Number
SC38/2007
Page 69 of 80