Supreme Court case information
Listed below are the substantive Supreme Court cases for the year along with appeals still to be determined or cases awaiting hearing.
Information giving an overview of the case is included along with media releases and links to judgments being appealed when available.
All 2024 - 2014 Supreme Court cases dismissed or deemed to be dismissed where a notice of abandonment was received can be found here.
Transcripts for cases heard before the Supreme Court are included provided they are not suppressed. Transcripts from pre-trial hearings are not published until the final disposition of trial. These are unedited transcripts and they are not a formal record of the Court’s proceedings. The Ministry of Justice does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of any material and recommends that users exercise their own skill and care with respect to its use.
19 June 2026
Case information summary (as at 19 June 2026) – Cases where leave granted (PDF, 89 KB)
Case information summary (as at 19 June 2026) – Cases where leave to appeal decision not yet made (PDF, 126 KB)
All years
Case name
Ahmed Zaoui v The Attorney-General, The Superintendent, Auckland Remand Prison and Human Rights Commission.
Case number
SC CIV 13/2004
Summary
Habeas Corpus - application for Habeas Corpus or bail under the inherent jurisdiction of the High Court where the applicant is detained on the basis of a security risk certificate issued pursuant to Part 4A Immigration Act 1987. CA166/04 17 September 2004 PDF 258kb
Result
14 October 2004. Gault J; Keith J. Leave to appeal granted.
14 October 2004
______________________________
Declaration that there is jurisdiction to grant bail and to vary warrant. Court to reconvene on Thursday 9 December 2004 to hear further argument.
25 November 2004
_______________
Bail allowed on conditions 9 December 2004
14 October 2004
______________________________
Declaration that there is jurisdiction to grant bail and to vary warrant. Court to reconvene on Thursday 9 December 2004 to hear further argument.
25 November 2004
_______________
Bail allowed on conditions 9 December 2004
Transcripts
- Hearing date 10 and 11 November 2004 (PDF, 437 KB)
- Hearing date 9 December 2004 (PDF, 105 KB)
Leave judgment - leave granted
Supreme court decision
Case name
The Attorney-General v Television New Zealand Ltd.
Case number
SC CIV 14/2004
Summary
Civil appeal - judicial review - whether granting a media interview to a detained person would risk undermining the administrative processes in which he was involved - whether involvement in such processes constitutes a limit on a detained person's freedom of expression. CA169/04 17 September 2004
Result
Leave to appeal refused. 14 October 2004
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
Case name
Edward Herbert Collingwood and Others v Minister of Internal Affairs, Hamilton City Council and Others.
Case number
SC CIV 15/2004
Summary
Appeal against refusal by Court of Appeal to grant leave to appeal out of time - appeal against further application for leave being struck out as an abuse of process. CA56/01 19 July 2004
Result
Leave to appeal refused. 2 November 2004 PDF 12kb
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
Case name
Attorney-General v Ahmed Zaoui, Inspector General of Intelligence and Security, and Human Rights Commissioner
Case number
SC CIV 19/2004
Summary
Civil appeal - judicial review of the standard to be applied by Inspector General in reviewing a security risk certificate issued under Part A of the Immigration Act 1997 in respect of a refugee who is said to be a threat to national security - whether Inspector General required to take into consideration New Zealand's international obligations, including but not limited to, the Refugee Convention - if so, what standard of risk does international law require before certificate can be confirmed. CA20/04 19 November 2004
Result
Leave to appeal granted.
3 February 2005
_______________________
The first respondent is granted leave to cross appeal. The declarations made by the Court of Appeal are set aside. The Court makes the following declarations: 1. Those applying article 33.2 of the Convention relating to the Status of Refugees 1951 under Part 4A of the Immigration Act 1987 are to apply it in its own terms. In particular, to come within article 33.2, the person in question must be thought on reasonable grounds to pose a serious threat to the security of New Zealand; the threat must be based on objectively reasonable grounds and the threatened harm must be substantial. 2. In carrying out his function under Part 4A of the Immigration Act the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security is concerned only to determine whether the relevant security criteria - here s 72 and article 33.2 - are satisfied. He is not to determine whether Mr Zaoui is subject to a threat which would or might prevent his removal from New Zealand. To the extent that the above declarations differ from those made by the Court of Appeal, the appeal and the cross-appeal are allowed.
21 June 2005
3 February 2005
_______________________
The first respondent is granted leave to cross appeal. The declarations made by the Court of Appeal are set aside. The Court makes the following declarations: 1. Those applying article 33.2 of the Convention relating to the Status of Refugees 1951 under Part 4A of the Immigration Act 1987 are to apply it in its own terms. In particular, to come within article 33.2, the person in question must be thought on reasonable grounds to pose a serious threat to the security of New Zealand; the threat must be based on objectively reasonable grounds and the threatened harm must be substantial. 2. In carrying out his function under Part 4A of the Immigration Act the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security is concerned only to determine whether the relevant security criteria - here s 72 and article 33.2 - are satisfied. He is not to determine whether Mr Zaoui is subject to a threat which would or might prevent his removal from New Zealand. To the extent that the above declarations differ from those made by the Court of Appeal, the appeal and the cross-appeal are allowed.
21 June 2005
Substantive judgment
Appeal Hearing Date
12 and 13 April 2005
Judgment appealed from
Case name
Parsoa Bahramitash v Stish Kumar and Sunila Kumar
Case number
SC CIV 23/2004
Summary
Civil appeal - Conveyancing - Whether the Court of Appeal erred in ordering specific performance - Whether the remedy of specific performance is reserved by clauses 9.5 and 9.7 of the REINZ-ADLS standard form agreement for sale and purchase - Whether clause 4.2(2) provides an exclusive remedy and ousts the application of equitable principles. CA 51/04 8 November 2004
Result
Gault J; Blanchard J. Leave to appeal granted. 3 March 2005 ______________________ Appeal dismissed. Costs to respondent $15,000 plus disbursements. Reasons now added. 30 June 2005
Leave judgment - leave granted
Reason for judgment
Judgment appealed from
Substantive judgment
Case name
James Bryson v Three Foot Six Limited
Case number
SC CIV 24/2004
Summary
Employment appeal - whether model maker working for the respondent was an employee or a independent contractor - interpretation of "employee" under s6 of the Employment Relations Act 2000 -whether film industry practice concerning manner of contracting staff relevant to determination - weight to be accorded to contractual label. CA 246/03 12 November 2004
Result
Gault J; Blanchard J. Leave to appeal granted. 22 February 2005 _____________________ New Zealand Council of Trade Unions granted Intervener status. 14 March 2005 ______________ Business New Zealand granted Intervener status. 16 March 2005 __________________________ The appeal is allowed. The decision of the Employment Court is restored. Costs in favour of the appellant against the respondent will be fixed by the Court following the receipt of written submissions. 16 June 2005 ___________________________ Judgment of the Court on Costs issued. 10 August 2005
Transcripts
- Hearing date 8 April 2005 CIV 24_2004 (PDF, 233 KB)
Leave judgment - leave granted
Substantive judgment
Supreme court decision
Case name
Henry John Esdaile Nation v Nicola Mary Nation
Case number
SC CIV 26/2004
Summary
Relationship property - whether the determination of the date for assessment of the effect of disposition under s44C Property (Relationships) Act 1976 should be the date of the hearing - whether certain livestock is relationship property - whether a 'put to use' arrangement in respect of livestock can have the status of a property right for the purpose of s10(2)
CA 190/03 26 November 2004
Result
21 April 2005
Leave to appeal granted.
8 April 2005
__________________
Notice of abandonment being lodged, the appeal is deemed to be dismissed.
Leave judgment - leave granted
Transcript
Hearing date : 22 July 2005
Judgment appealed from
Case name
John Hemmes v John Patrick Young
Case number
SC CIV 27/2004
Summary
Family law - whether s16(2) of the Adoption Act 1995 precludes the High Court from issuing a declaration of paternity under s10 of the Status of Children Act 1969 in respect of a child and natural parent where the child has been adopted.
Result
Leave to appeal granted.
8 March 2005
______________
Appeal allowed. All orders made below are set aside. The proceeding is struck out. Costs to the appellant in the total sum of $25,000 to cover all courts plus disbursements.
15 July 2005
8 March 2005
______________
Appeal allowed. All orders made below are set aside. The proceeding is struck out. Costs to the appellant in the total sum of $25,000 to cover all courts plus disbursements.
15 July 2005
Transcripts
- Hearing date 23 June 2005 (PDF, 85 KB)
Leave judgment - leave granted
HEMMES V YOUNG [2005] NZSC 9 8 March 2005 (PDF, 12 KB)
Substantive judgment
HEMMES V YOUNG SC CIV 27/2004 [15 July 2005] (PDF, 51 KB)
Judgment appealed from
CA 33/04 26 November 2004 (note : not available electronically)
Case name
Fiso Siloata
Case number
SC CRI 8/2004
Summary
Criminal appeal against conviction for possession of cannabis for supply - whether the jury must be unanimous that the defence has failed to rebut the presumption that possession of cannabis was for supply. CA 447/03 14 July 2004
Result
Leave to appeal granted.
14 September 2004
____________________________
Appeal dismissed.
16 December 2004
14 September 2004
____________________________
Appeal dismissed.
16 December 2004
Leave judgment - leave granted
Siloata v R 14 september 2004 SC CRI 8/2004 (PDF, 10 KB)
Supreme court decision
SILOATA V R SC SC CRI 8/2004 [16 December 2004] (PDF, 79 KB)
Judgment appealed from
Transcript
Case name
R v Atirut Sungsuwan.
Case number
SC CRI 11/2004
Summary
Criminal appeal against conviction - whether trial counsel made a fundamental error in not making an application under s23A of the Evidence Act to admit evidence of the complainant's previous sexual history - proper approach to whether an error by counsel has resulted in a miscarriage of justice: R v Paparachi (1993) 10 CRNZ 293 (CA) and Benedetto v R [2003] 1 WLR 1545 (PC) - whether prosecutor should be allowed to make statements in closing which are known to be contradicted to be called at trial. CA479/03 11 August 2004
Result
Leave to appeal granted.
17 December 2004
______________________
Appeal dismissed.
25 August 2005
17 December 2004
______________________
Appeal dismissed.
25 August 2005
Leave judgment - leave granted
R V SUNGSUWAN SC SC CRI 11/2004 [17 December 2004] (PDF, 12 KB)
Substantive judgment
SUNGSUWAN V R SC SC 11/2004 [25 August 2005] (PDF, 146 KB)
Transcript
Page 79 of 80