Supreme Court case information

Listed below are the substantive Supreme Court cases for the year along with appeals still to be determined or cases awaiting hearing. 

Information giving an overview of the case is included along with media releases and links to judgments being appealed when available.

All 2024 - 2014 Supreme Court cases dismissed or deemed to be dismissed where a notice of abandonment was received can be found here.

Transcripts for cases heard before the Supreme Court are included provided they are not suppressed. Transcripts from pre-trial hearings are not published until the final disposition of trial. These are unedited transcripts and they are not a formal record of the Court’s proceedings. The Ministry of Justice does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of any material and recommends that users exercise their own skill and care with respect to its use.

17 August 2026

Case information summary (as at 17 August 2026) –  Cases where leave granted (PDF, 87 KB)
Case information summary (as at 17 August 2026)  – Cases where leave to appeal decision not yet made (PDF, 128 KB) 

All years

Case name
Pimthong Udompun v Minister of Immigration and New Zealand Police
Case number
SC 38/2005
Summary
Bill of Rights - Whether a failure to make a properly qualified interpreter available is a breach of s27(1) NZBORA - Whether the handing to a detainee a form in the detainee's native language setting out her NZBORA rights satisfied her rights under s23(1) - Whether a Baigent's award of $4000 for breach of s23(5) NZBORA is distinctly inadequate in the circumstances - Whether, having established a breach of the NZBORA, the authority concerned should fully meet reasonable indemnity costs and disbursements - Whether award should be with interest from the date of the breach. CA 244/03 26 May 2005
Result
Application for leave to appeal is dismissed. 9 February 2006
Case name
ANZO Foods Waitara Limited, Itoham New Zealand Limited & Riverlands Limited v Affco New Zealand Limited
Case number
SC 41/2005
Summary
Encumbrance - interpretation - whether certain meat processing activity within terms of encumbrance - competition law - whether encumbrance prohibited by Commerce Act 1986, sections 27 and 28. CA 181/04 23 June 2005
Result
For hearing 26 July 2005 Notice of abandonment being lodged the appeal is deemed to be dismissed.1 August 2005.
Case name
Alain Michael Mafart and Dominique Angela Francoise Prieur v Television New Zealand Limited
Case number
SC 50/2005
Summary
Leave to search, inspect and copy criminal records held by the High Court - videotape of Rainbow Warrior proceedings - jurisdiction of Court of Appeal - whether application for leave to search is civil or criminal - whether Court of Appeal jurisdiction precluded by the Judicature Act 1908, s 66. CA 92/05 4 August 2005
Result
Leave to appeal granted 21 September 2005
Case name
Noel Clement Rogers v The Queen
Case number
SC 52/2005
Summary
Criminal appeal - whether the Court erred in finding post arrest statements by the accused admissible - whether allowing the statements to be admitted is inconsistent with ss 23 and 24 of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 - whether, no appeal having been heard by the Court of Appeal, this is an appropriate case to "leap frog" under s 14 of the Supreme Court Act 2003 . CRI 2004 004 013121 2 August 2005
Result
Notice of abandonment being lodged, the appeal is deemed to be dismissed. 29 September 2005
Case name
Robert John Condon v The Queen
Case number
SC 66/2005
Summary
Criminal appeal - trial judge's refusal to grant adjournment following withdrawal of counsel leading to accused representing himself at trial - accused convicted and sentenced to imprisonment - whether breach of Sentencing Act 2002, s 30(1) or New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990, s 24 - applicant seeking leave to appeal out of timeCA 373/03 21 July 2004
Result

Leave to appeal granted.

27 March 2006

Case name
Swetman and Westham Holdings Limited v Globe Holdings Limited
Case number
SC 69/2005
Summary
Civil appeal - summary judgment - sale and purchase of land - whether the Court of Appeal erred in holding that s225(1) of the Resource Management Act did not apply - whether the Court of Appeal erred in finding that the Appellants' failure to settle constituted a breach - whether the Court of Appeal erred in refusing to acept new evidence - whether the Court of Appeal misdirected itself as to the applicable principles of law.CA 81/05 17 October 2005
Result
Leave to appeal dismissed. 27 March 2006
Case name
Jason John Cumming v The Queen
Case number
SC 72/2005
Summary
Criminal appeal - whether the Court of Appeal erred in holding an accused should be allowed to invoke right of self-representation where their decision was "fully informed and deliberate" whether the trial judges summing up and other interventions during the course of the trial led to a miscarriage of justice.CA 43/03 2 November 2005.
Result
Leave to appeal granted.
27 March 2006
_____________________
Appeal allowed, conviction quashed. New trial ordered.
15 May 2008
Date of hearing
19 October 2006
Judges
Elias CJ, Blanchard, Tipping, Anderson and Gault JJ: substantive hearing: 28 February 2008
Media Releases
Leave judgment - leave granted
Substantive judgment
Case name
Benjamin Eugene Manuel v The Superintendent, Hawkes Bay Prison
Case number
SC CIV 5/2004
Summary
Habeas Corpus - proper case scope of writ of habeas corpus under the Habeas Corpus Act 2001 - relationship with judicial review. Parole - nature of parole - test for recall - conformity with New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights - Parole Board procedure on recall. CA 67/01 15 June 2004
Result
Leave to appeal refused. 3 August 2004
Case name
Te Runanga O Muriwhenua v Treaty of Waitangi Fisheries Commission; The Attorney-General of New Zealand; The Minister of Fisheries; Te Kotahitanga O Te Arawa Fisheries Trust and Te Runanaga O Ngai Tahu
Case number
SC CIV 8/2004
Summary
Judicial review - allocation of assets provided in settlement of Maori commercial fishing claims - whether the final allocation model proposed by the Commission in its final report He Kawai Amokaura is unreasonable - whether the allocation model should have taken into account alleged inequities deriving from the way quota was managed by the Commission from 1990 onwards - whether the consultation undertaken by the Commission leading up to its final report on this issue was sufficient. CA 73/04 30 June 2004
Result
Leave to appeal dismissed. 23 September 2004
Case name
The Attorney-General v Television New Zealand Ltd.
Case number
SC CIV 14/2004
Summary
Civil appeal - judicial review - whether granting a media interview to a detained person would risk undermining the administrative processes in which he was involved - whether involvement in such processes constitutes a limit on a detained person's freedom of expression. CA169/04 17 September 2004
Result
Leave to appeal refused. 14 October 2004