Supreme Court case information
Listed below are the substantive Supreme Court cases for the year along with appeals still to be determined or cases awaiting hearing.
Information giving an overview of the case is included along with media releases and links to judgments being appealed when available.
All 2024 - 2014 Supreme Court cases dismissed or deemed to be dismissed where a notice of abandonment was received can be found here.
Transcripts for cases heard before the Supreme Court are included provided they are not suppressed. Transcripts from pre-trial hearings are not published until the final disposition of trial. These are unedited transcripts and they are not a formal record of the Court’s proceedings. The Ministry of Justice does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of any material and recommends that users exercise their own skill and care with respect to its use.
19 June 2026
Case information summary (as at 19 June 2026) – Cases where leave granted (PDF, 89 KB)
Case information summary (as at 19 June 2026) – Cases where leave to appeal decision not yet made (PDF, 126 KB)
All years
Case name
Alain Michael Mafart and Dominique Angela Francoise Prieur v Television New Zealand Limited
Case number
SC 50/2005
Summary
Leave to search, inspect and copy criminal records held by the High Court - videotape of Rainbow Warrior proceedings - jurisdiction of Court of Appeal - whether application for leave to search is civil or criminal - whether Court of Appeal jurisdiction precluded by the Judicature Act 1908, s 66. CA 92/05 4 August 2005
Result
Leave to appeal granted 21 September 2005
Leave judgment - leave granted
Transcript
Judgment appealed from
Case name
Noel Clement Rogers v The Queen
Case number
SC 52/2005
Summary
Criminal appeal - whether the Court erred in finding post arrest statements by the accused admissible - whether allowing the statements to be admitted is inconsistent with ss 23 and 24 of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 - whether, no appeal having been heard by the Court of Appeal, this is an appropriate case to "leap frog" under s 14 of the Supreme Court Act 2003 . CRI 2004 004 013121 2 August 2005
Result
Notice of abandonment being lodged, the appeal is deemed to be dismissed. 29 September 2005
Case name
Robert John Condon v The Queen
Case number
SC 66/2005
Summary
Criminal appeal - trial judge's refusal to grant adjournment following withdrawal of counsel leading to accused representing himself at trial - accused convicted and sentenced to imprisonment - whether breach of Sentencing Act 2002, s 30(1) or New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990, s 24 - applicant seeking leave to appeal out of timeCA 373/03 21 July 2004
Result
Leave to appeal granted.
27 March 2006
Leave judgment - leave granted
Transcription
Judgment appealed from
Case name
Swetman and Westham Holdings Limited v Globe Holdings Limited
Case number
SC 69/2005
Summary
Civil appeal - summary judgment - sale and purchase of land - whether the Court of Appeal erred in holding that s225(1) of the Resource Management Act did not apply - whether the Court of Appeal erred in finding that the Appellants' failure to settle constituted a breach - whether the Court of Appeal erred in refusing to acept new evidence - whether the Court of Appeal misdirected itself as to the applicable principles of law.CA 81/05 17 October 2005
Result
Leave to appeal dismissed. 27 March 2006
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
Judgment appealed from
Case name
Jason John Cumming v The Queen
Case number
SC 72/2005
Summary
Criminal appeal - whether the Court of Appeal erred in holding an accused should be allowed to invoke right of self-representation where their decision was "fully informed and deliberate" whether the trial judges summing up and other interventions during the course of the trial led to a miscarriage of justice.CA 43/03 2 November 2005.
Result
Leave to appeal granted.
27 March 2006
_____________________
Appeal allowed, conviction quashed. New trial ordered.
15 May 2008
27 March 2006
_____________________
Appeal allowed, conviction quashed. New trial ordered.
15 May 2008
Date of hearing
19 October 2006
Judges
Elias CJ, Blanchard, Tipping, Anderson and Gault JJ: substantive hearing: 28 February 2008
Media Releases
- mediarelease sc722005cummingvr 000 (PDF, 87 KB)
Court of Appeal decision
Leave judgment - leave granted
CUMMING V R SC 72/2005 [27 March 2006] (PDF, 12 KB)
Substantive judgment
CUMMING v R SC 72/2005 [15 May 2008] (PDF, 51 KB)
Case name
Benjamin Eugene Manuel v The Superintendent, Hawkes Bay Prison
Case number
SC CIV 5/2004
Summary
Habeas Corpus - proper case scope of writ of habeas corpus under the Habeas Corpus Act 2001 - relationship with judicial review. Parole - nature of parole - test for recall - conformity with New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights - Parole Board procedure on recall. CA 67/01 15 June 2004
Result
Leave to appeal refused. 3 August 2004
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
Judgment appealed from
Transcript
Case name
Te Runanga O Muriwhenua v Treaty of Waitangi Fisheries Commission; The Attorney-General of New Zealand; The Minister of Fisheries; Te Kotahitanga O Te Arawa Fisheries Trust and Te Runanaga O Ngai Tahu
Case number
SC CIV 8/2004
Summary
Judicial review - allocation of assets provided in settlement of Maori commercial fishing claims - whether the final allocation model proposed by the Commission in its final report He Kawai Amokaura is unreasonable - whether the allocation model should have taken into account alleged inequities deriving from the way quota was managed by the Commission from 1990 onwards - whether the consultation undertaken by the Commission leading up to its final report on this issue was sufficient. CA 73/04 30 June 2004
Result
Leave to appeal dismissed. 23 September 2004
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
Judgment appealed from
Case name
The Attorney-General v Television New Zealand Ltd.
Case number
SC CIV 14/2004
Summary
Civil appeal - judicial review - whether granting a media interview to a detained person would risk undermining the administrative processes in which he was involved - whether involvement in such processes constitutes a limit on a detained person's freedom of expression. CA169/04 17 September 2004
Result
Leave to appeal refused. 14 October 2004
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
Case name
Latimer Holdings Ltd and John William Powell v Sea Holdings New Zealand Ltd.
Case number
SC CIV 16/2004
Summary
Civil appeal - appeal against the decision of the Court of Appeal dismissing an appeal from the interlocutory decision of the High Court entering summary judgment in favour of the respondent - whether detriment suffered by the applicant was within the category of unfair detriment in s174 Companies Act. CA 214/03 15 September 2004
Result
Leave to appeal dismissed. Costs to respondent $1000 and disbursements. 24 November 2004
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
Case name
Attorney-General v Ahmed Zaoui, Inspector General of Intelligence and Security, and Human Rights Commissioner
Case number
SC CIV 19/2004
Summary
Civil appeal - judicial review of the standard to be applied by Inspector General in reviewing a security risk certificate issued under Part A of the Immigration Act 1997 in respect of a refugee who is said to be a threat to national security - whether Inspector General required to take into consideration New Zealand's international obligations, including but not limited to, the Refugee Convention - if so, what standard of risk does international law require before certificate can be confirmed. CA20/04 19 November 2004
Result
Leave to appeal granted.
3 February 2005
_______________________
The first respondent is granted leave to cross appeal. The declarations made by the Court of Appeal are set aside. The Court makes the following declarations: 1. Those applying article 33.2 of the Convention relating to the Status of Refugees 1951 under Part 4A of the Immigration Act 1987 are to apply it in its own terms. In particular, to come within article 33.2, the person in question must be thought on reasonable grounds to pose a serious threat to the security of New Zealand; the threat must be based on objectively reasonable grounds and the threatened harm must be substantial. 2. In carrying out his function under Part 4A of the Immigration Act the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security is concerned only to determine whether the relevant security criteria - here s 72 and article 33.2 - are satisfied. He is not to determine whether Mr Zaoui is subject to a threat which would or might prevent his removal from New Zealand. To the extent that the above declarations differ from those made by the Court of Appeal, the appeal and the cross-appeal are allowed.
21 June 2005
3 February 2005
_______________________
The first respondent is granted leave to cross appeal. The declarations made by the Court of Appeal are set aside. The Court makes the following declarations: 1. Those applying article 33.2 of the Convention relating to the Status of Refugees 1951 under Part 4A of the Immigration Act 1987 are to apply it in its own terms. In particular, to come within article 33.2, the person in question must be thought on reasonable grounds to pose a serious threat to the security of New Zealand; the threat must be based on objectively reasonable grounds and the threatened harm must be substantial. 2. In carrying out his function under Part 4A of the Immigration Act the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security is concerned only to determine whether the relevant security criteria - here s 72 and article 33.2 - are satisfied. He is not to determine whether Mr Zaoui is subject to a threat which would or might prevent his removal from New Zealand. To the extent that the above declarations differ from those made by the Court of Appeal, the appeal and the cross-appeal are allowed.
21 June 2005
Substantive judgment
Appeal Hearing Date
12 and 13 April 2005
Judgment appealed from
Page 54 of 55