Supreme Court case information
Listed below are the substantive Supreme Court cases for the year along with appeals still to be determined or cases awaiting hearing.
Information giving an overview of the case is included along with media releases and links to judgments being appealed when available.
All 2024 - 2014 Supreme Court cases dismissed or deemed to be dismissed where a notice of abandonment was received can be found here.
Transcripts for cases heard before the Supreme Court are included provided they are not suppressed. Transcripts from pre-trial hearings are not published until the final disposition of trial. These are unedited transcripts and they are not a formal record of the Court’s proceedings. The Ministry of Justice does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of any material and recommends that users exercise their own skill and care with respect to its use.
31 July 2026
Case information summary (as at 31 July 2026) – Cases where leave granted (PDF, 87 KB)
Case information summary (as at 31 July 2026) – Cases where leave to appeal decision not yet made (PDF, 131 KB)
All years
Case name
Symphony Group Limited v Vero Liability Insurance Ltd
Case number
SC 89/2008
Summary
Civil – whether an insured defendant may join its insurer to a proceeding as a third party pursuant to Rule 75 of the High Court Rules and resist an application for strike out - whether the Court of Appeal was correct to hold that Rule 75 does not apply where the plaintiff’s claim against the insured does not include a claim for which the insured is indemnified, but the plaintiff has notified the Court of its intention to add such a claim – whether the principle in Couch v Attorney General [2008] NZSC 45, that if a saving amendment can be made to a claim it should not be struck out, should apply by analogy where a saving amendment is to be made to a plaintiff’ s claim, that will give the defendant a right to indemnity from its insurers.[2008] NZCA 419 CA 132/08 23 October 2008
Result
Notice of Abandonment of Appeal lodged. Appeal deemed to be dismissed.
9 July 2009
9 July 2009
Leave judgment - leave granted
Additional document
Dates
Application for leave to appeal granted.
1 April 2009
Case name
Astrazeneca Limited v Commerce Commission and Pharmaceutical Management Agency
Case number
SC 91/2008
Summary
Civil Appeal – Respondent gave notice under s 98 of the Commerce Act 1986 of an investigation into allegations that the applicant acted contrary to section 36 of the Act in negotiations with PHARMAC – whether exemption to Part 2 of the Commerce Act in s 53 of the Public Health and Disability Act 2000 applied so that the respondent should not have issued a notice – whether Court of Appeal erred in concluding it did not have sufficient factual information to determine whether s 53 applied – whether the Court of Appeal was correct to conclude that there might be some other purpose of s 53 which would become evident when it was considered in light of the full facts.[2008] NZCA 479 CA 241/2008 11 November 2008
Result
Application for leave to appeal granted
25 February 2009
________________________
Appeal allowed. It is declared that the notice under s 98 of the Commerce Act 1986 given by the Commerce Commission on 31 October 2007 was ultra vires and invalid. It is ordered that the notice is quashed. The Commerce Commission is ordered to pay the appellant costs in this Court of $15,000 together with reasonable disbursements as fixed by the Registrar. Costs in the Court of Appeal and the High Court should now be fixed respectively by those Courts in light of this Court’s judgment.
26 August 2009
25 February 2009
________________________
Appeal allowed. It is declared that the notice under s 98 of the Commerce Act 1986 given by the Commerce Commission on 31 October 2007 was ultra vires and invalid. It is ordered that the notice is quashed. The Commerce Commission is ordered to pay the appellant costs in this Court of $15,000 together with reasonable disbursements as fixed by the Registrar. Costs in the Court of Appeal and the High Court should now be fixed respectively by those Courts in light of this Court’s judgment.
26 August 2009
Media Releases
Leave judgment - leave granted
Substantive judgment
Transcript
Case name
Deryck Joseph Morgan v The Queen
Case number
SC 92/2008
Summary
Criminal Appeal – aggravated robbery – appeal against conviction – miscarriage of justice – previous inconsistent statement of hostile witness – actual statement not produced until re-examination because of oversight – whether Court of Appeal was correct to hold that this statement was admissible as evidence of the truth of its contents.[2008] NZCA 537 CA 481 /2008 5 December 2008
Result
Application for leave to appeal granted.
25 March 2009
_________________________
Appeal dismissed.
16 March 2010
25 March 2009
_________________________
Appeal dismissed.
16 March 2010
Transcripts
- Hearing date 16 July 2009 (PDF, 294 KB)
Media Releases
- press release morgan v the queen (PDF, 31 KB)
Leave judgment - leave granted
MORGAN v R SC 92/2008 [25 March 2009] (PDF, 12 KB)
Substantive judgment
MORGAN v R SC 92/2008 [16 March 2010] (PDF, 87 KB)
Case name
Kevin Jack Ngan v The Queen
Case number
SC 5/2007
Summary
Criminal – appeal against conviction – earlier unsuccessful application for leave to appeal directly to Supreme Court (see SC 24/2006) – lawfulness of “inventory searches” – admissibility of evidence obtained through police searches of applicant’s sunglasses pouch and wallet following injury of applicant in car crash – whether Court of Appeal erred in holding that searches both lawful and reasonable and evidence therefore properly admitted. CA 220/06 1 December 2006
Result
Leave to appeal granted. 15 March 2007
Media Releases
- pressreleasengan 000 (PDF, 78 KB)
Leave judgment - leave granted
Substantive judgment
NGAN v R SC 5/2007 [13 December 2007] (PDF, 195 KB)
Judgment appealed from
Transcript
Substantive judgment / Media release
Case name
Unison Networks Limited v The Commerce Commission
Case number
SC 12/2007
Summary
Civil Appeal – appeal against the Court of Appeal’s decision that revised price-related thresholds set by the Commerce Commission were lawful and the Court’s refusal to exercise its discretion to grant relief in relation to initial unlawful thresholds – whether the Court of Appeal erred in law by failing to consider whether the Commerce Commission misdirected itself and therefore erred in finding the revised thresholds to be lawful – whether the Court erred in law by finding that the revised thresholds met the statutory purpose and were thus lawful – whether it is appropriate for the Court to decline relief where a statutory body has acted outside the statutory process – whether the Court erred by failing to consider other types of relief. CA 284/05 19 December 2006
Result
Leave to appeal granted.
27 March 2007
____________________
Appeal dismissed.
Unison is ordered to pay the Commission costs of $25,000 plus reasonable disbursements to be fixed if necessary by the Registrar. Costs in the Court of Appeal and High Court are to be determined by those Courts in light of this judgment.
10 September 2007
27 March 2007
____________________
Appeal dismissed.
Unison is ordered to pay the Commission costs of $25,000 plus reasonable disbursements to be fixed if necessary by the Registrar. Costs in the Court of Appeal and High Court are to be determined by those Courts in light of this judgment.
10 September 2007
Leave judgment - leave granted
Substantive judgment /Media release
Transcription
Hearing date : 18 and 20 June 2007
Blanchard J, Tipping J, McGrath J, Anderson J and Gault J.
Blanchard J, Tipping J, McGrath J, Anderson J and Gault J.
Judgment appealed from
Case name
Aqua Technics Pool and Spa Centre New Zealand Limited v Aqua-Tech Limited
Case number
SC 24/2007
Summary
Civil – proprietorship of trade mark – Trademarks Act 1953 – Assistant Commissioner of Trade Marks declined to register “Aqua-Tech” as a trademark in relation to spa and swimming pools – decision overturned by High Court and Court of Appeal – whether the Court of Appeal erred in upholding the High Court’s finding that Aqua-Tech had established public use of the trademark. CA 257/05 22 March 2007
Result
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with Costs of $2,500 to the respondent.
9 July 2007
9 July 2007
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
Case name
Kurt John Owen v The Queen
Case number
SC 25/2007
Summary
Criminal – appeal against conviction – whether discretion to consider appeals on the basis of unreasonable verdicts has been unduly restricted – complaint about the adequacy of summing up by trial judge – emotive summing up by prosecution – direction by trial judge concerning prosecution’s comment on the right to silence – trial judge’ s use of the transcript – whether Court of Appeal was correct to hold that overall there was no miscarriage of justice.CA 342/06 21 March 2007
Result
Application for leave to appeal granted.
29 June 2006
________________________
Appeal dismissed.
11 December 2007
29 June 2006
________________________
Appeal dismissed.
11 December 2007
Media Releases
- mediarelease owen (PDF, 87 KB)
Leave judgment - leave granted
Substantive judgment
OWEN V R SC 25/2007 [11 December 2007] (PDF, 57 KB)
Transcript
Substantive judgment / Media release
Judgment appealed from
Case name
Dollars and Sense Finance Limited v Rerekohu Nathan
Case number
SC 31/2007
Summary
Summary Civil appeal – enforceability of a registered mortgage – borrower forged the signature of one of the sureties, his mother, on the mortgage documents – lender’s solicitor had delivered the mortgage documents to the borrower to procure the signatures and express informed consent of the sureties – whether the borrower was the agent of the lender – whether the borrower’s fraud can be attributed to the lender – whether the surety has an in personam claim against the lender. CA 107/05 4 May 2007
Result
Application for leave to appeal granted.
29 June 2007
______________________
Appeal dismissed with costs of $15,000 and reasonable disbursements to the respondent.
8 April 2008
29 June 2007
______________________
Appeal dismissed with costs of $15,000 and reasonable disbursements to the respondent.
8 April 2008
Leave judgment - leave granted
Judgment appealed from
Transcript
Substantive judgment / Media release
Case name
Joseph Ronald Belcher v The Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections
Case number
SC 33/2007
Summary
Criminal – sexual offending – appeal against sentence – applicant first sentenced in 1996 – Extended Supervision Order (ESO) imposed in 2005 – whether applicant received a fair hearing by an independent tribunal – whether imposition of ESO was unlawful, arbitrary and manifestly excessive – whether process by which ESO was imposed was flawed in relation to admissibility and treatment of evidence or otherwise – whether Court of Appeal erred in holding it had no jurisdiction to make a declaration of inconsistency of the Parole (Extended Supervision) Amendment Act 2004 with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990.CA 185/05 3 May 2007
Result
Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
16 July 2007
16 July 2007
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
Case name
Philip David Sturm v The Queen
Case number
SC 35/2007
Summary
Criminal – appeal against conviction – in relation to appellant’ s conviction for stupefying with intent to facilitate the commission of a crime Court of Appeal held that Crown had to prove not only an intention to facilitate the commission of a crime but also an intention to stupefy – trial directions – whether Court of Appeal erred in finding that trial Judge’s directions were sufficient regarding the intention to stupefy – whether Court of Appeal should have focused on whether directions contained an error of law giving rise to a substantial miscarriage of justice rather than focusing on sufficiency of directions – whether Court of Appeal erred in holding that even if directions were unsatisfactory the appellant was clearly subjectively reckless – whether Court of Appeal erred in finding no error in trial Judge’s direction that the voluntary consumption of drugs and alcohol was irrelevant to stupefying counts – whether Court of Appeal erred in concluding that there was no merit in the suggestion that the verdict on the stupefying count “coloured” the other verdicts.CA 35/2007 4 May 2007
Result
Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
2 August 2007
2 August 2007
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
STURM V R SC 35/2007 [2 August 2007] (PDF, 17 KB)
Judgment appealed from
Page 69 of 78