Supreme Court case information
Listed below are the substantive Supreme Court cases for the year along with appeals still to be determined or cases awaiting hearing.
Information giving an overview of the case is included along with media releases and links to judgments being appealed when available.
All 2024 - 2014 Supreme Court cases dismissed or deemed to be dismissed where a notice of abandonment was received can be found here.
Transcripts for cases heard before the Supreme Court are included provided they are not suppressed. Transcripts from pre-trial hearings are not published until the final disposition of trial. These are unedited transcripts and they are not a formal record of the Court’s proceedings. The Ministry of Justice does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of any material and recommends that users exercise their own skill and care with respect to its use.
31 July 2026
Case information summary (as at 31 July 2026) – Cases where leave granted (PDF, 87 KB)
Case information summary (as at 31 July 2026) – Cases where leave to appeal decision not yet made (PDF, 131 KB)
All years
Case name
Attorney-General v Ahmed Zaoui, Inspector General of Intelligence and Security, and Human Rights Commissioner
Case number
SC CIV 19/2004
Summary
Civil appeal - judicial review of the standard to be applied by Inspector General in reviewing a security risk certificate issued under Part A of the Immigration Act 1997 in respect of a refugee who is said to be a threat to national security - whether Inspector General required to take into consideration New Zealand's international obligations, including but not limited to, the Refugee Convention - if so, what standard of risk does international law require before certificate can be confirmed. CA20/04 19 November 2004
Result
Leave to appeal granted.
3 February 2005
_______________________
The first respondent is granted leave to cross appeal. The declarations made by the Court of Appeal are set aside. The Court makes the following declarations: 1. Those applying article 33.2 of the Convention relating to the Status of Refugees 1951 under Part 4A of the Immigration Act 1987 are to apply it in its own terms. In particular, to come within article 33.2, the person in question must be thought on reasonable grounds to pose a serious threat to the security of New Zealand; the threat must be based on objectively reasonable grounds and the threatened harm must be substantial. 2. In carrying out his function under Part 4A of the Immigration Act the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security is concerned only to determine whether the relevant security criteria - here s 72 and article 33.2 - are satisfied. He is not to determine whether Mr Zaoui is subject to a threat which would or might prevent his removal from New Zealand. To the extent that the above declarations differ from those made by the Court of Appeal, the appeal and the cross-appeal are allowed.
21 June 2005
3 February 2005
_______________________
The first respondent is granted leave to cross appeal. The declarations made by the Court of Appeal are set aside. The Court makes the following declarations: 1. Those applying article 33.2 of the Convention relating to the Status of Refugees 1951 under Part 4A of the Immigration Act 1987 are to apply it in its own terms. In particular, to come within article 33.2, the person in question must be thought on reasonable grounds to pose a serious threat to the security of New Zealand; the threat must be based on objectively reasonable grounds and the threatened harm must be substantial. 2. In carrying out his function under Part 4A of the Immigration Act the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security is concerned only to determine whether the relevant security criteria - here s 72 and article 33.2 - are satisfied. He is not to determine whether Mr Zaoui is subject to a threat which would or might prevent his removal from New Zealand. To the extent that the above declarations differ from those made by the Court of Appeal, the appeal and the cross-appeal are allowed.
21 June 2005
Substantive judgment
Appeal Hearing Date
12 and 13 April 2005
Judgment appealed from
Case name
Calan Healthcare Properties Limited v Richard John Ord and Colleen Mary Fenton.
Case number
SC CIV 22/2004
Summary
Civil appeal - whether the lodging of an updating share transfer, which gives effect to a change of trustee, establishes that "a shareholder is intending to transfer any shares", and thus triggers rights of pre-emption under the appellant's constituion - propoer approach to interpretation of a constitution. CA31/04 CA165/04 7 October 2004
Result
Application for leave to appeal is dismissed. Costs to Respondents of $2,500 plus disbursements to be fixed if necessary by the Registrar. 27 April 2005
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
Judgment appealed from
Case name
James Bryson v Three Foot Six Limited
Case number
SC CIV 24/2004
Summary
Employment appeal - whether model maker working for the respondent was an employee or a independent contractor - interpretation of "employee" under s6 of the Employment Relations Act 2000 -whether film industry practice concerning manner of contracting staff relevant to determination - weight to be accorded to contractual label. CA 246/03 12 November 2004
Result
Gault J; Blanchard J. Leave to appeal granted. 22 February 2005 _____________________ New Zealand Council of Trade Unions granted Intervener status. 14 March 2005 ______________ Business New Zealand granted Intervener status. 16 March 2005 __________________________ The appeal is allowed. The decision of the Employment Court is restored. Costs in favour of the appellant against the respondent will be fixed by the Court following the receipt of written submissions. 16 June 2005 ___________________________ Judgment of the Court on Costs issued. 10 August 2005
Transcripts
- Hearing date 8 April 2005 CIV 24_2004 (PDF, 233 KB)
Leave judgment - leave granted
Substantive judgment
Supreme court decision
Case name
Peter Francis Urbani v Gillions and Sons Limited
Case number
SC 2/2004
Summary
Civil appeal - standard to be applied by Court of Appeal in appeals from findings of fact whether the Court of Appeal should evaluate the relevant evidence and reach and express its own conclusions. CA 56/03 1 April 2004
Result
Leave to appeal refused.
15 July 2004
_________________________
Decision on costs.
17 August 2004
15 July 2004
_________________________
Decision on costs.
17 August 2004
Transcripts
- Hearing date 13 July 2004 (PDF, 111 KB)
Court of Appeal decision
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
Additional document
Case name
Westfield (New Zealand) Limited and Northcote Mainstreet Incorporated v North Shore City Council and Discount Brands Limited
Case number
SC 4/2004 SC CIV 4/2004
Summary
Civil appeal - resource management - application for consent for non-complying activity - whether a decision to proceed on a non-notified basis is extraordinary - whether the correct standard of review of such a decision is to be in accordance with traditional Wednesbury principles - whether the cautionary approach discussed in Bayley v Manukau City Council (1999) NZLR 568 should be adopted in non-notification decisions - whether there was sufficient material before the Commissioners to enable them to conclude that the effects of the application would be more than de minimis. CA 30/04 14 June 2004.
Result
6 October 2004 Elias CJ; Tipping J Leave to appeal granted.
6 October 2004
________________________________
The appeal is allowed. The order of the High Court is restored. The decisions made by the North Shore City Council (a) on 25 July 2003 not to require notification of the second respondent's resource consent application and (b) on 21 August 2003 granting that application are set aside. Costs in favour of the appellants are to be fixed by the Court following receipt of written submissions.
19 April 2005
6 October 2004
________________________________
The appeal is allowed. The order of the High Court is restored. The decisions made by the North Shore City Council (a) on 25 July 2003 not to require notification of the second respondent's resource consent application and (b) on 21 August 2003 granting that application are set aside. Costs in favour of the appellants are to be fixed by the Court following receipt of written submissions.
19 April 2005
Transcripts
- Hearing date 6 - 8 December 2004 (PDF, 685 KB)
Court of Appeal decision
Leave judgment - leave granted
Substantive judgment
Case name
Richard Prebble and Ken Shirley v Donna Awatere Huata
Case number
SC 9/2004 SC CIV 9/2004
Summary
Whether distortion of "the proportionality of political party representation in Parliament" in terms of s55D of the Electoral Act 1993 was properly limited to conduct which alters a party's relative voting strength through defection - whether the belief of the leaders of the Act party that Huata had acted so as to distort the proportionality of Parliament was a reasonable one - whether, and to what extent, the scope of judicial review is limited in the context of ss55A-55D of the Act. CA34/04 16 July 2004
Result
Leave to appeal granted.
25 August 2004
_________________
A Appeal allowed
B Order of the Court of Appeal prohibiting delivery of the proposed notice to the Speaker of the House of Representatives is discharged.
C Appellant entitled to costs in this and the lower courts.
18 November 2004
________________________
Costs to appellant in the sum of $15,000, together with disbursements of $2,000.
19 April 2005
25 August 2004
_________________
A Appeal allowed
B Order of the Court of Appeal prohibiting delivery of the proposed notice to the Speaker of the House of Representatives is discharged.
C Appellant entitled to costs in this and the lower courts.
18 November 2004
________________________
Costs to appellant in the sum of $15,000, together with disbursements of $2,000.
19 April 2005
Transcripts
- Hearing 5 October 2004 (PDF, 305 KB)
Court of Appeal decision
Leave judgment - leave granted
Substantive judgment
Additional document
Page 78 of 78