Supreme Court case information
Listed below are the substantive Supreme Court cases for the year along with appeals still to be determined or cases awaiting hearing.
Information giving an overview of the case is included along with media releases and links to judgments being appealed when available.
All 2024 - 2014 Supreme Court cases dismissed or deemed to be dismissed where a notice of abandonment was received can be found here.
Transcripts for cases heard before the Supreme Court are included provided they are not suppressed. Transcripts from pre-trial hearings are not published until the final disposition of trial. These are unedited transcripts and they are not a formal record of the Court’s proceedings. The Ministry of Justice does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of any material and recommends that users exercise their own skill and care with respect to its use.
20 March 2026
Case information summary 2025 (as at 20 March 2026) – Cases where leave granted (PDF, 88 KB)
Case information summary 2025 (as at 20 March 2026) – Cases where leave to appeal decision not yet made (PDF, 123 KB)
All years
Case name
Arshad Mahmodd Chatha v The Queen
Case number
SC 58/2006
Summary
Criminal – appeal against pre-trial ruling in High Court – whether change of venue necessary for applicant to have fair and impartial trial – whether High Court Judge erred in dismissing s 344A Crimes Act 1961 application for exclusion of evidence obtained pursuant to search warrant – further disclosure and discovery sought – alleged corruption of prosecution witnesses in New Zealand and overseas – challenge to bail condition preventing applicant from leaving New Zealand to “investigate matters relevant to the preparation of his defence” – whether undue delays in investigation and prosecution warranting discharge.CRI 2004 054 4551 18 July 2006
Result
Notice of Abandonment being lodged, the application is deemed to be dismissed.
11 September 2006
11 September 2006
Case name
Frank Louis Miessen v The Queen
Case number
SC 59/2006
Summary
Criminal – appeal against conviction for threatening to kill – former police officer threatening to kill the Prime Minister – whether verdict unreasonable and cannot be supported having regard to the evidence – whether Crown counsel’s opening statement improper – whether counsel error in failing to call evidence or put substantial defence – admissibility of evidence – whether defendant detained by police – whether police gave defendant adequate Bill of Rights advice and caution. CA 222/05 6 July 2006
Result
Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
26 September 2006
26 September 2006
Court of Appeal decision
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
MIESSEN V R SC 59/2006 [26 September 2006] (PDF, 15 KB)
Case name
Deo Dhatt Sharma v The Queen
Case number
SC 60/2006
Summary
Criminal – appeal against assault convictions – whether acknowledged failure of natural justice and inadequate answer to jury question on one assault count tainted verdicts on other counts – whether Court of Appeal erred in applying proviso in s 385(1) Crimes Act 1961 to dismiss appeals relating to other counts – whether Court of Appeal entitled to apply the proviso in breach of right to fair trial affirmed in s 25(a) New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 – obligations of trial Judge in ensuring fair trial for unrepresented accused.
Result
Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
2 October 2006
2 October 2006
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
SHARMA v R SC 60/2006 [2 October 2006] (PDF, 16 KB)
Case name
Michael John Jones v The Queen
Case number
SC 65/2006
Summary
Criminal – defendant pleaded guilty on arraignment to counts of assault with a weapon and threatening to kill – whether Court of Appeal erred in dismissing appeal against conviction on the ground of undue delay. CA 27/06 25 July 2006
Result
10 October 2006
Notice of Abandonment being lodged, the application is deemed to be dismissed.
Notice of Abandonment being lodged, the application is deemed to be dismissed.
Judgment appealed from
Case name
Darryl Shane Wilson v The Queen
Case number
SC 66/2006
Summary
Criminal appeal – appeal against sentence – whether application of sentencing guidelines in R v Taueki [2005] 3 NZLR 372 to offending which took place before the issue of that decision is contrary to the prohibition on retrospective increases in penalty in s 25(g) of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act, s 6(1) of the Sentencing Act 2002, various international covenants, and/or good sentencing practice/fairness.CA 334/05 31 July 2006
Result
Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
18 October 2006
18 October 2006
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
WILSON V R SC 66/2006 [18 October 2006] (PDF, 19 KB)
Case name
Brent John Gilchrist v The Queen
Case number
SC 69/2006
Summary
Criminal – Tax Administration Act – tax evasion – applicant convicted of knowingly failing to provide Commissioner of Inland Revenue with information when required to do so pursuant to a notice to furnish information – standard of proof of delegation of authority from Commissioner – standard of intent to evade payment of tax.CA 29/06 18 August 2006
Result
Application for leave to appeal granted.
29 September 2006
________________
Appeal dismissed.
15 December 2006
Transcript
Substantive judgment / Media release
Leave judgment - leave granted
Judgment appealed from
Case name
Alain Michael Yves Mafart and Dominique Angela Francoise Prieur v Television New Zealand Limited
Case number
SC 70/2006
Summary
Civil – Criminal Proceedings (Search of Court Records) Rules 1974 – video footage of guilty pleas in 1985 trial for bombing of Rainbow Warrior – whether Court of Appeal erred in failing adequately to take account of the administration of justice – whether Court of Appeal erred in failing to protect privacy interests of appellants, or in balancing those interests with freedom of information – whether Court of Appeal erred in departing from previous decisions in respect of the footage – whether Court of Appeal and High Court erred in failing to uphold assurance given to counsel by Judge in 1985 in respect of footage – whether assurance overtaken by consent orders.CA 92/05 7 and 10 August 2006
Result
Application for leave to appeal dismissed. Costs of $2,500 to respondent. 26 September 2006
Judgment appealed from
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
Case name
Myles James de Montalk v The Queen
Case number
SC 71/2006
Summary
Criminal – application for leave to appeal out of time – whether Court of Appeal’s alleged refusal to disclose evidence was tainted by racial, religious, or ethnical bias – whether Court of Appeal thereby in breach of New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990, s 25(a).CA 11/04 27 June 2006
Result
Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
18 October 2006
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
Judgment appealed from
Case name
Michael Frank Templeton v The Queen
Case number
SC 73/2006
Summary
Criminal – appeal against conviction and sentence – party to firearms offences – counsel incompetence – whether trial counsel misled or pressured applicant into not giving evidence – whether applicant fit to stand trial – whether sentence manifestly excessive. CA 460/05 6 July 2006
Result
Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
16 February 2007
16 February 2007
Court of Appeal decision
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
TEMPLETON v R SC 73/2006 [16 February 2007] (PDF, 15 KB)
Case name
Ricardo Genovese v The Queen
Case number
SC 74/2006
Summary
Criminal – appeal against conviction – allegation that applicant denied his right to representation – refusal by trial judge of adjournment to allow counsel to familiarise himself with the file – whether this amounted to breach of Bill of Rights Act – whether warrants defective in inferring applicant was legally represented – whether counsel failed to raise appeal against sentence and Bill of Rights in Court of Appeal. CA 151/02 CA 151/02 20 September 2005
Result
Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
28 November 2006
28 November 2006
Court of Appeal decision
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
GENOVESE v R SC 74/2006 [28 November 2006] (PDF, 79 KB)
Page 105 of 111