Supreme Court case information

Listed below are the substantive Supreme Court cases for the year along with appeals still to be determined or cases awaiting hearing. 

Information giving an overview of the case is included along with media releases and links to judgments being appealed when available.

All 2024 - 2014 Supreme Court cases dismissed or deemed to be dismissed where a notice of abandonment was received can be found here.

Transcripts for cases heard before the Supreme Court are included provided they are not suppressed. Transcripts from pre-trial hearings are not published until the final disposition of trial. These are unedited transcripts and they are not a formal record of the Court’s proceedings. The Ministry of Justice does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of any material and recommends that users exercise their own skill and care with respect to its use.

19 June 2026

Case information summary (as at 19 June 2026) –  Cases where leave granted (PDF, 89 KB)
Case information summary (as at 19 June 2026)  – Cases where leave to appeal decision not yet made (PDF, 126 KB) 

All years

Case name
Gerardus Peter van Uden v Commissioner of Inland Revenue
Case number
SC 108/2018
Summary
Civil Appeal – Income Tax Act 1994, s OE 1 – Meaning of “ permanent place of abode” –Taxation of income in New Zealand while working overseas – Whether the Court of Appeal was right to dismiss the applicant’s appeal against the High Court’s decision.
Result
A The application for leave to appeal is dismissed.
B The applicant must pay the respondent costs of $2,500.
19 March 2019
High Court decision
VAN UDEN v THE COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE [2017] NZHC 2554 [19 October 2017]
Court of Appeal decision
VAN UDEN v COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE [2018] NZCA 487 [8 November 2018]
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
GERARDUS PETER VAN UDEN v COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE [2019] NZSC 29[19 March 2019] (PDF, 48 KB)
Case name
Commercial Factors Limited v Jeffrey Philip Meltzer, Lloyd James Hayward and Arron Leslie Heath
Case number
SC 111/2018
Summary
Civil appeal – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in holding that the appellant funder was not entitled to payment according to the terms of its litigation funding agreement with the respondents as liquidators of Blue Chip New Zealand Ltd.
Result
A The application for leave to appeal is dismissed.
B The applicant must pay to the respondents costs of $2,500.
27 February 2019
High Court decision
COMMERCIAL FACTORS LIMITED v MELTZER & ORS [2017] NZHC 3267 [20 December 2017]
Court of Appeal decision
COMMERCIAL FACTORS LTD v MELTZER [2018] NZCA 505 [16 November 2018]
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
COMMERCIAL FACTORS LIMITED v MELTZER & ORS [2019] NZSC 17 [27 February 2019] (PDF, 198 KB)
Case name
Shreesh Basnyat v New Zealand Police
Case number
SC 113/2018
Summary
Criminal Appeal – Sentencing Act 2002 – Whether there are exceptional circumstances justifying a direct appeal against a decision of the High Court dismissing an appeal against a refusal to discharge the applicant without conviction.
Result
The application for leave to appeal is dismissed.
5 March 2019
High Court decision
BASNYAT v POLICE [2018] NZHC 51 [5 February 2018]
Court of Appeal decision
BASNYAT v NEW ZEALAND POLICE [2018] NZCA 486 [8 November 2018]
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
SHREESH BASNYAT v NEW ZEALAND POLICE [2019] NZSC 21 [5 March 2019] (PDF, 195 KB)
Case name
H v The Queen
Case number
SC 114/2018
Summary
Order prohibiting publication of the judgment or any part of the proceedings (including the result) in the news media or on the internet or other publicly available database until final disposition of the trial. Publication in a law report or law digest permitted.  
Result

Order prohibiting publication of the judgment and any part of the proceedings (including the result) in news media or on the internet or other publicly available database until final disposition of trial. Publication in law report or law digest permitted.
27 February 2019
Court of Appeal decision
Not publicly available
High Court/District Court judgment
Not publicly available
Case name
P v The Queen
Case number
SC 115/2018
Summary
Order prohibiting publication of the judgment or any part of the proceedings (including the result) in the news media or on the internet or other publicly available database until final disposition of the trial. Publication in a law report or law digest permitted.  
Result

Order prohibiting publication of the judgment and any part of the proceedings (including the result) in news media or on the internet or other publicly available database until final disposition of trial. Publication in law report or law digest permitted.
27 February 2019
Court of Appeal decision
Not publicly available
High Court/District Court judgment
Not publicly available
Case name
Lodge Real Estate Limited, Monarch Real Estate Limited, Brian King and Jeremy O'Rourke v Commerce Commission
Case number
SC 116/2018
Summary
Civil Appeal – Commerce Act 1986, s 30 – Whether there must be a moral obligation for the purposes of price fixing – Whether there was an agreement to vendor fund – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in allowing the respondent’s appeal against the High Court’s decision.
Result
A An extension of time to file the application for leave to appeal is granted.
B Leave to appeal is granted (Commerce Commission v Lodge Real Estate Ltd [2018] NZCA 523) on the question whether the Court of Appeal should have allowed the respondent’s appeal to that Court except as set out at C below.
C To the extent the application for leave seeks to argue that the respondent had not adequately pleaded and to appeal from the dismissal of the applicants’ cross appeal the application is dismissed.
19 March 2019
___________________

A The appeal is dismissed.
B The appellants must pay costs of $35,000 plus usual disbursements to the respondent.
2 April 2020
Judges
Winkelmann CJ, Glazebrook, O'Regan, Ellen France and Williams JJ
Transcripts
Media Releases
High Court decision
COMMERCE COMMISSION v LODGE REAL ESTATE LTD & ORS [2017] NZHC 1497 [2 November 2017]
Court of Appeal decision
COMMERCE COMMISSION v LODGE REAL ESTATE LIMITED [2018] NZCA 523 [23 November 2018]
Leave judgment - leave granted
LODGE REAL ESTATE LIMITED v COMMERCE COMMISSION [2019] NZSC 28 [19 March 201 (PDF, 244 KB)
Substantive judgment
LODGE REAL ESTATE LIMITED v COMMERCE COMMISSION [2020] NZSC 25 [2 April 2020] (PDF, 318 KB)
Case name
Liu Ping and Xing Li v Yue LI, Jing Chen, Kuhua Lu and Xiaoan Chen 
Case number
SC 117/2018
Summary
Civil Appeal – Whether or not the Court of Appeal erred in ordering that the applicants’ solicitor and her firm are disqualified from acting in the proceeding.
Result
A Notice of Abandonment  having been filed the application for leave to appeal is deemed to be dismissed.
20 February 2019
High Court decision
LIU v LV & Ors [2017] NZHC 2277 [20 September 2017]
Court of Appeal decision
LI v LIU [2018] NZCA 528 [26 November 2018]
Case name
Peter John Chambers v The Queen 
Case number
SC 118/2018
Summary
Criminal Appeal – Whether the Court of Appeal erred by not admitting evidence under section 44 of the Evidence Act 2006.
Result
The applications for leave to appeal are dismissed.
22 February 2019
District Court decision
Not publicly available
Court of Appeal decision
ARONA & CHAMBERS v R [2018] NZCA 427 [12 October 2018]
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
MARK ARONA AND PETER CHAMBERS v R [2019] NZSC 12 [22 February 2019] (PDF, 45 KB)
Case name
Donna Michelle Ritchie v Accident Compensation Corporation
Case number
SC 2/2017
Summary
Civil Appeal – Accident Compensation Act 2001, s 110(3) – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in its interpretation of s 110(3) of the Accident Compensation Act 2001 –  Whether the Court of Appeal erred in applying McGrath v Accident Compensation Corporation [2011] NZSC 77, [2011] 3 NZLR 733 –  Whether the Court of Appeal erred in its assessment of evidence.
Result
The application for leave to appeal is dismissed.
1 May 2017
High Court decision
DONNA RITCHIE V ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION [2015] NZHC 2305     23 September 2015
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
DONNA MICHELLE RITCHIE v ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION [2017] NZSC 54    1 May 2017 (PDF, 77 KB)
Judgment appealed from

DONNA MICHELLE RITCHIE v ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION [2016] NZCA 577   2 December 2016
Case name
Malcolm Edward Rabson v Judicial Conduct Commissioner
Case number
SC 4/2017
Summary
Civil Appeal – Whether the High Court erred in striking out the applicant’s application for judicial review of the Judicial Conduct Commissioner’ s decision that it did not have jurisdiction to consider the applicant’ s complaint.
Result
A The application for leave to appeal is dismissed.
B The applicant must pay the respondent costs of $2,500.
27 March 2017
________________________
The application for recall is dismissed.    
9 May 2017
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
MALCOLM EDWARD RABSON v JUDICIAL CONDUCT COMMISSIONER [2017] NZSC 39  27 March 2017 (PDF, 74 KB)
Recall judgment
MALCOLM EDWARD RABSON v JUDICIAL CONDUCT COMMISSIONER [2017] NZSC 66    9 May 2017 (PDF, 70 KB)
HC judgment appealed from

MALCOLM EDWARD RABSON v JUDICIAL CONDUCT COMMISSIONER [2016] NZHC 3162   20 December 2016                                              __
Page 31 of 137