Supreme Court case information
Listed below are the substantive Supreme Court cases for the year along with appeals still to be determined or cases awaiting hearing.
Information giving an overview of the case is included along with media releases and links to judgments being appealed when available.
All 2024 - 2014 Supreme Court cases dismissed or deemed to be dismissed where a notice of abandonment was received can be found here.
Transcripts for cases heard before the Supreme Court are included provided they are not suppressed. Transcripts from pre-trial hearings are not published until the final disposition of trial. These are unedited transcripts and they are not a formal record of the Court’s proceedings. The Ministry of Justice does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of any material and recommends that users exercise their own skill and care with respect to its use.
19 June 2026
Case information summary (as at 19 June 2026) – Cases where leave granted (PDF, 89 KB)
Case information summary (as at 19 June 2026) – Cases where leave to appeal decision not yet made (PDF, 126 KB)
All years
Case name
Austin, Nichols & Co. Inc v Stichting Lodestar
Case number
SC 21/2007
Summary
Civil appeal – Trade Marks Act 1953 – whether, in hearing an appeal from the Assistant Commissioner of Trade Marks, the High Court must have deference to the Assistant Commission’s findings, only overturning a decision that can fairly be characterised as wrong – whether the Court of Appeal erred in its interpretation of its own powers under the Court of Appeal (Civil) Rules 2005 in determining the appeal from the High Court decision – whether the Court of Appeal erred by ignoring the onus on the trade mark applicant to discharge the burden of demonstrating that registration of its trade mark would not lead to a likelihood of confusion or deception. CA 94/05 12 March 2007
Result
Application for leave to appeal granted.
7 June 2007
______________________________
Appeal dismissed. Costs $7,5000 plus disbursements to the respondent.
7 June 2007
______________________________
Appeal dismissed. Costs $7,5000 plus disbursements to the respondent.
Transcripts
- Hearing date 17 October 2007 (PDF, 244 KB)
Media Releases
- MR [2007] NZSC 103 (PDF, 88 KB)
Court of Appeal decision
Leave judgment - leave granted
Substantive judgment
Case name
Waitara Leaseholders Association Inc v New Plymouth District Council
Case number
SC 23/2007
Summary
Civil –Whether the Court of Appeal erred in concluding that land was not held on a charitable trust and that the Council was not subject to the obligations of charitable trustees – whether the Court of Appeal erred in finding the Council was not obliged to consider the objects of the statutory trusts when deciding to seek legislation to remove trust restrictions – whether the Court of Appeal erred in finding that compliance with section 14(6) of the Trustee Act 1956 relieves a trustee from its obligation of obtaining the best price for an asset – whether the Supreme Court should grant leave to pursue a new ground, namely that the Council failed to take into account the fact that its decisions were contrary to previous promises and assurances that it had made.CA 259/05 CA 260/05 20 March 2007
Result
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs $2,500 to the respondent.
20 June 2007
20 June 2007
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
Case name
Aqua Technics Pool and Spa Centre New Zealand Limited v Aqua-Tech Limited
Case number
SC 24/2007
Summary
Civil – proprietorship of trade mark – Trademarks Act 1953 – Assistant Commissioner of Trade Marks declined to register “Aqua-Tech” as a trademark in relation to spa and swimming pools – decision overturned by High Court and Court of Appeal – whether the Court of Appeal erred in upholding the High Court’s finding that Aqua-Tech had established public use of the trademark. CA 257/05 22 March 2007
Result
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with Costs of $2,500 to the respondent.
9 July 2007
9 July 2007
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
Case name
Sione Tau Uluakiola v The Queen
Case number
SC 28/2007
Summary
Criminal – appeal against conviction – provocation – whether R v Tai [1976] 1 NZLR 102 should be overruled – meaning of “ ordinary person” in s 169(2)(a) of the Crimes Act 1961 – whether appellant’ s Tongan ethnicity and background a qualifying “special characteristic” that could have increased the gravity of the provocation. CA 123/06 6 December 2006
Result
Application for leave to appeal dismissed
22 June 2007
22 June 2007
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
ULUAKIOLA v R SC 28/2007 [22 June 2007] (PDF, 16 KB)
Judgment appealed from
Case name
Deo Datt Sharma v Nirmala Wati
Case number
SC 29/2007
Summary
Civil appeal – application for removal of counsel for child – whether the Court of Appeal erred in refusing leave to appeal under s 145(1)(b) Care of Children Act 2004 – whether the Court of Appeal erred in deciding that there was no right of appeal under s 66 Judicature Act 1908 – whether the Court of Appeal erred in its award of costs – additional application for temporary stay of access proceedings in Auckland High Court CA 98/07 2 May 2007
Result
Application for leave to appeal is dismissed.
23 July 2007
23 July 2007
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
SHARMA v NIRMALA WATI SC 29/2007 [23 July 2007] (PDF, 14 KB)
Judgment appealed from
Case name
Brian Johnson Mankelow v The Queen
Case number
SC 30/2007
Summary
Criminal – appeal against conviction – trial directions as to inferences – whether the Court of Appeal should have reconsidered its decision in 2005 that certain evidence was admissible in light of the decision of the Court of Appeal in R v Williams [2007] NZCA 52 – whether there has been a substantial miscarriage of justice. CA 443/06 19 April 2007
Result
Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
20 July 2007
20 July 2007
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
MANKELOW v R SC 30/2007 [20 July 2007] (PDF, 15 KB)
Judgment appealed from
Case name
Joseph Ronald Belcher v The Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections
Case number
SC 33/2007
Summary
Criminal – sexual offending – appeal against sentence – applicant first sentenced in 1996 – Extended Supervision Order (ESO) imposed in 2005 – whether applicant received a fair hearing by an independent tribunal – whether imposition of ESO was unlawful, arbitrary and manifestly excessive – whether process by which ESO was imposed was flawed in relation to admissibility and treatment of evidence or otherwise – whether Court of Appeal erred in holding it had no jurisdiction to make a declaration of inconsistency of the Parole (Extended Supervision) Amendment Act 2004 with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990.CA 185/05 3 May 2007
Result
Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
16 July 2007
16 July 2007
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
Case name
Palmiro McDonald v The Queen
Case number
SC 36/2007
Summary
Criminal appeal – Crimes Act 1961, s 339 – exercise of discretion by trial judge to include an lesser charge – whether jury direction effective to cure any prejudice caused by disclosure of inadmissible evidence at trial. CA 356/06 20 April 2007
Result
Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
21 August 2007
21 August 2007
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
McDONALD v R SC 36/2007 [21 August 2007] (PDF, 22 KB)
Judgment appealed from
Case name
Georgina Kain, George Harry Couper Kain, George Charles Kain, George Thomas Carlton Kain and George Michael Kain and others v Jonathan Rhodes Hutton and others
Case number
SC 40/2007
Summary
Civil – dispute between family members over administration of a number of trusts – whether Court of Appeal erred in finding that resettlement of trust assets was valid – validity of exercise of power of appointment – power of advancement – s 41(c) of Trustee Act 1956 – whether appointment and settlement of shares was valid and not a fraud on the power – whether Court of Appeal erred in refusing to order the Second and Third Respondents to account to the trusts for profits made on the purchase of two farms – whether Court of Appeal erred in not finding a serious breach of trust – whether Court of Appeal erred in finding a particular part of consent order to be valid – interests of grandchildren – s 64A of Trustee Act 1956.CA 237/03, CA 271/04, CA 4/05 22 May 2007
Result
Leave to appeal granted.
20 November 2007
20 November 2007
Transcripts
- Hearing date 19 November 2007 SC 40/2007 (PDF, 128 KB)
- Hearing date 10 June 2008 SC 40/2007 (PDF, 281 KB)
Media Releases
- MR [2008] NZSC 61 (PDF, 88 KB)
Leave judgment - leave granted
Substantive judgment
KAIN AND ORS v HUTTON AND ORS SC 40/2007 [7 August 2008] (PDF, 113 KB)
Judgment appealed from
Case name
KMA v Secretary for Justice
Case number
SC 42/2007
Summary
Civil Appeal – Hague Convention – leap frog appeal against a High Court decision following a Court of Appeal decision refusing leave – whether the High Court erred by upholding a Family Court’s decision ordering two of the applicant’s children be returned to Australia under the Hague Convention – whether the High Court erred by refusing to consider a submission that the respondent acquiesced by taking no steps in relation to the application for four and a half months - application for stay of execution – application to adduce new evidence regarding the financial position of the parties and allegations that the respondent sexually abused another childCA 159/07 5 June 2007; CIv 2006 409 2482 16 March 2007
Result
Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
Costs reserved.
20 July 2007
______________________
Judgment of the Court on costs issued.
29 August 2007
Costs reserved.
20 July 2007
______________________
Judgment of the Court on costs issued.
29 August 2007
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
Additional document
Page 97 of 117