DH v The Queen - SC 9/2014
Media releases
Summary
Criminal Appeal – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in finding that the trial judge was correct to admit expert evidence – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in finding that the trial judge’s directions in relation to the expert evidence was adequate – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in finding that the trial judge’s directions in relation to evidence of no prior convictions was appropriate.[2013] NZCA 670 CA 87/2012
Result
A Leave to appeal is granted.
B The approved question is whether the Court of Appeal was correct to dismiss the conviction appeal.
2 May 2014
_____________
Appeal dismissed.
16 April 2015
B The approved question is whether the Court of Appeal was correct to dismiss the conviction appeal.
2 May 2014
_____________
Appeal dismissed.
16 April 2015
Related Documents
Leave judgment - leave granted — DH (SC9/2014) v R [2014] NZSC 50 [2 May 2014] (PDF 8 KB)
Substantive judgment — DH (SC 9/2014) v R [2015] NZSC 35 [16 April 2015] (PDF 366 KB)