Kovinantie Vahafolua Fukofuka v The Queen - SC 95/2012
Media releases
Summary
Criminal Appeal – Evidence Act 2006, s 126(2)(a) – Judicial warnings about identification evidence – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in holding that no substantial miscarriage of justice occurred through the trial Judge’s failure to sum up in terms of s 126(2)(a). [2012] NZCA 510 CA 216/2012
Result
A The application for leave to appeal is granted.
B The approved ground is: was the Court of Appeal correct to find no substantial miscarriage of justice occurred despite the error in the Judge’s direction under s 126 of the Evidence Act 2006?
18 April 2013
________________
tc
B The approved ground is: was the Court of Appeal correct to find no substantial miscarriage of justice occurred despite the error in the Judge’s direction under s 126 of the Evidence Act 2006?
18 April 2013
________________
tc
Hearing Transcripts
Related Documents
Leave judgment - leave granted — KOVINANTIE VAHAFOLUA FUKOFUKA V R SC 95/2012 [18 April 2013] (PDF 30 KB)
Substantive judgment — FUKOFUKA v R [2013] NZSC 77 [16 August 2013] (PDF 150 KB)