Print this page

Mark Robert Sandman v Colin Charles McKay, Roger David Cann and David John Clark - SC 35/2018

Media releases

Summary

Civil Appeal – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in granting summary judgment to the respondents on the cause of action against them.

Result

A Leave to appeal is granted (McKay v Sandman [2018] NZCA 103, [2018] NZAR 707).
B The approved question is whether the Court of Appeal erred in granting summary judgment to the respondents on the cause of action against them.
7 August 2018
________________________
A  The appeal is dismissed.
B Costs of $25,000 plus usual disbursements are awarded to the respondents.  
16 April 2019

Hearing Transcripts

Related Documents

High Court decision — M R SANDMAN v R J GIBONEY AND C C MCKAY AND C C MCKAY, R D CANN AND D J CLARK [2017] NZHC 1832 [4 August 2017]

Court of Appeal decision — MCKAY & ORS v MARK ROBERT SANDMAN [2018] NZCA 103 [20 April 2018]

Leave judgment - leave granted — MARK ROBERT SANDMAN v COLIN CHARLES McKAY, ROGER DAVID CANN AND DAVID JOHN CLARK [2018] NZSC 71 [7 August 2018] (PDF 179 KB)

Substantive judgment — MARK ROBERT SANDMAN v COLIN CHARLES McKAY, ROGER DAVID CANN AND DAVID JOHN CLARK (as partners of Wilson McKay) [2019] NZSC 41 [16 April 2019] (PDF 541 KB)