Shane Dromgool, Dorothy Dromgool, Alan Darvall Poulton, Jennifer Poulton and Newman Farms Limited v Minister for Land Information - SC 32/2021
Media releases
Summary
Result
Whether the Court of Appeal was correct in its interpretation of the role and obligations of the Minister for Land Information in deciding an application under s 186(1) of the Resource Management Act 1991 and, in particular, whether the Minister must be satisfied that the proposed taking is fair, sound and reasonably necessary for achieving the objectives of the network utility operator or whether it is sufficient that the Minister is satisfied the proposed taking is capable of meeting that test.
B The application for leave to appeal is otherwise dismissed.
24 June 2021
__________________________________________
A The appeal is dismissed.
B The appellants must pay the respondent costs of $25,000 plus usual disbursements.
22 December 2022
Date of Hearing
22 March 2022
Judges
Winkelman CJ, William Young, Glazebrook, O'Regan, Ellen France and Williams JJ
Hearing Transcripts
Related Documents
High Court decision — DROMGOOL v MINISTER FOR LAND INFORMATION [2019] NZHC 1563 [5 July 2019]
Court of Appeal decision — MINISTER FOR LAND INFORMATION v DROMGOOL [2021] NZCA 44 [5 March 2021]
Leave judgment - leave granted — DROMGOOL v MINISTER FOR LAND INFORMATION [2021] NZSC 71 [24 June 2021 (PDF 202 KB)
Substantive judgment — SHANE DROMGOOL AND ORS v MINISTER FOR LAND INFORMATION [2022] NZSC 157 [22 December 2022] (PDF 344 KB)