Supreme Court case information
Listed below are the substantive Supreme Court cases for the year along with appeals still to be determined or cases awaiting hearing.
Information giving an overview of the case is included along with media releases and links to judgments being appealed when available.
All 2024 - 2014 Supreme Court cases dismissed or deemed to be dismissed where a notice of abandonment was received can be found here.
Transcripts for cases heard before the Supreme Court are included provided they are not suppressed. Transcripts from pre-trial hearings are not published until the final disposition of trial. These are unedited transcripts and they are not a formal record of the Court’s proceedings. The Ministry of Justice does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of any material and recommends that users exercise their own skill and care with respect to its use.
19 June 2026
Case information summary (as at 19 June 2026) – Cases where leave granted (PDF, 89 KB)
Case information summary (as at 19 June 2026) – Cases where leave to appeal decision not yet made (PDF, 126 KB)
All years
Case name
Philip David Sturm v The Queen
Case number
SC 35/2007
Summary
Criminal – appeal against conviction – in relation to appellant’ s conviction for stupefying with intent to facilitate the commission of a crime Court of Appeal held that Crown had to prove not only an intention to facilitate the commission of a crime but also an intention to stupefy – trial directions – whether Court of Appeal erred in finding that trial Judge’s directions were sufficient regarding the intention to stupefy – whether Court of Appeal should have focused on whether directions contained an error of law giving rise to a substantial miscarriage of justice rather than focusing on sufficiency of directions – whether Court of Appeal erred in holding that even if directions were unsatisfactory the appellant was clearly subjectively reckless – whether Court of Appeal erred in finding no error in trial Judge’s direction that the voluntary consumption of drugs and alcohol was irrelevant to stupefying counts – whether Court of Appeal erred in concluding that there was no merit in the suggestion that the verdict on the stupefying count “coloured” the other verdicts.CA 35/2007 4 May 2007
Result
Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
2 August 2007
2 August 2007
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
STURM V R SC 35/2007 [2 August 2007] (PDF, 17 KB)
Judgment appealed from
Case name
Christopher Cliff Morris v The Queen
Case number
SC 61/2007
Summary
Criminal appeal – Crimes Act 1961, s 229A – using a tax document with intent to defraud – whether, under the Tax Administration Act 1994, employees of the Inland Revenue Department can give evidence in the prosecution – whether ss 81(1) and 81(3) of that Act preclude employees of the Inland Revenue Department giving evidence unless either the prosecution is initiated by the Commissioner of Inland Revenue for offences under the Inland Revenue Acts or the evidence falls within one of the exceptions listed in s 81(4) – whether the Court of Appeal was correct to direct a new trial under s 382 of the Crimes Act 1961 – application for leave to appeal out of time.CA 120/04 4 November 2004
Result
Application for leave to appeal dismissed. 30 October 2007
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
MORRIS v R SC 61/2007 [30 October 2007] (PDF, 18 KB)
Case name
Regal Castings Limited v G M and G N Lightbody and others
Case number
SC 72/2007
Summary
Civil appeal – whether transfer of property from first respondents to second respondent trustees should have been set aside under section 60 Property Law Act 1952 – whether the transfer amounted to fraud - whether Freeman v Pope (1870) 5 LR Ch App 538 represents the correct law where an insolvent debtor transfers property – whether there is a conclusive presumption of fraud in such situations– whether the High Court should have inferred an intention to defraud even if Freeman v Pope does not represent the law – whether the Court of Appeal erred by requiring the appellant to show that prejudice to the creditor was the purpose of the transaction – whether the Court of Appeal erred in law by overlooking relevant objective factors – whether the Court of Appeal erred by putting weight on subjective factors.[2007] NZCA 396 CA 234/05 7 September 2007
Result
Application for leave to appeal granted.
13 December 2007
_______________________________
Appeal allowed. Cost to the appellant.
23 October 2008
13 December 2007
_______________________________
Appeal allowed. Cost to the appellant.
23 October 2008
Transcripts
- Hearing date 10 April 2008 SC 72/2007 (PDF, 355 KB)
Media Releases
- MR [2008] NZSC 87 (PDF, 89 KB)
Leave judgment - leave granted
Substantive judgment
Judgment appealed from
Case name
Terrence Austin McFarland v The Queen
Case number
SC 79/2007
Summary
Criminal – appeal against conviction for maiming with intent to cause grievous bodily harm – applicant was unrepresented at trial – amicus curiae appointed without prior notice to the applicant, in his absence, and without his consent – whether the amicus made a substantial error in failing to advise the applicant against calling evidence from the former co-accused – whether the trial Judge erred by misdirecting the jury on the standard of proof and failing to provide directions on the cross-examination and the submissions made to the jury by crown counsel.[2007] NZCA 449 CA 385/06 18 October 2007
Result
Application for leave to appeal dismissed. 5 March 2008
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
MCFARLAND v R SC 79/2007 [5 March 2008] (PDF, 19 KB)
Judgment appealed from
Case name
Joseph Junior Sipa v The Queen
Case number
SC 4/2006
Summary
Criminal law - appeal from Court of Appeal decision on Solicitor-General appeal against sentence for injuring with intent to injure - whether Court of Appeal erred in allowing appeals by Solicitor-General and substituting a sentence of three and a half years' imprisonment - approach when accused relies on sentencing indication given to co-offender - appellant entered guilty plea on the basis of sentencing indication given to his co-offender (his de facto partner) - whether the Court of Appeal should have remitted the case to the District Court for re-sentencing in light of its decision in R v Edwards . CA 390/05 7 December 2005
Result
Leave to Appeal granted.
28 March 2006
____________________________
Appeal dismissed.
20 July 2006
28 March 2006
____________________________
Appeal dismissed.
20 July 2006
Leave judgment - leave granted
SIPA And Anor V R SC 4/2006 [28 March 2006] (PDF, 14 KB)
Judgment appealed from
Substantive judgment
Transcript
Case name
Tess Jean Edwards v The Queen
Case number
SC 5/2006
Summary
Criminal law - appeal from Court of Appeal decision on Solicitor-General appeal against sentence for injuring with intent to injure - whether Court of Appeal erred in refusing to vacate guilty plea - whether Court of Appeal erred in allowing appeals by Solicitor-General and substituting a sentence of three and a half years' imprisonment - whether the Court of Appeal should have remitted the case to the District Court to allow the appellant to reconsider her guilty plea in light of its decision that the sentencing Judge misinformed himself in light of the Court of Appeal's decision in Taueki . CA 390/05 7 December 2005
Result
Leave to Appeal granted.
28 March 2006
_________________
20 July 2006.
Appeal dismissed.
28 March 2006
_________________
20 July 2006.
Appeal dismissed.
Judgment appealed from
Leave judgment - leave granted
Substantive judgment
Case name
Martin Charles Cox v The Queen
Case number
SC 7/2006
Summary
Criminal law - appeal against conviction for assault with intent to commit sexual violation and sexual violation - whether the conduct of the Crown at trial justified the ordering of a new trial - whether the direction to the jury would have left the jury in doubt as to the burden of proof - misdirection on the core issue - approach to questioning in cross-examination that tends to breach solicitor/client privilege - prior consistent statement evidence. CA 240/05 7 December 2005
Result
Leave to Appeal dismissed.
31 March 2006
31 March 2006
Court of Appeal decision
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
COX V R SC 7/2006 [31 March 2006] (PDF, 18 KB)
Case name
Brian Raymond Terry v The Queen
Case number
SC 31/2006
Summary
Criminal – appeal against conviction for assault with intent to injure – whether a substantial miscarriage of justice occurred because the Court of Appeal declined to direct the Crown to forensically examine a certain garment introduced at trial by the defence. CA 154/05 23 March 2006
Result
Leave to appeal dismissed.
14 June 2006
14 June 2006
Court of Appeal decision
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
TERRY V R SC 31/2006 [14 June 2006] (PDF, 16 KB)
Case name
Peter Mana McNamara v The Queen
Case number
SC 33/2006
Summary
Criminal – appeal against conviction – sexual offending – complainant protected by Evidence Act 1908, s 23A – complainant’ s credibility in issue – Crown Prosecutor addressed complainant’s sexual experience and reputation in submissions – defence unable to respond to those submissions without leave – whether the submissions breached the spirit and intent of s 23A – whether the trial Judge failed to adequately direct jury not to accept or to ignore the submissions CA 310/05 11 April 2006
Result
Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
29 June 2006
29 June 2006
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
MCNAMARA V R SC 33/2006 [29 June 2006] (PDF, 15 KB)
Case name
Qiu Jian v The Queen
Case number
SC 41/2006
Summary
Criminal Appeal – appeal against conviction for blackmail – whether standard of proof required for Crown to satisfy co-conspirators rule of evidence is on balance of probabilities or reasonable evidence of common intention – whether failure to advise defendant to testify in her own defence amounted to a miscarriage of justice – whether trial judge failed to give sufficient direction to jury on use which could be made of threats made by alleged co-conspirators. CA 495/05 3 May 2006
Result
29 September 2006 – Application for leave to appeal granted.
_____________________
Appeal allowed, conviction is quashed. New Trial ordered.
5 July 2007
Substantive judgment
Judgment appealed from
Leave judgment - leave granted
Page 5 of 6