Supreme Court case information
Listed below are the substantive Supreme Court cases for the year along with appeals still to be determined or cases awaiting hearing.
Information giving an overview of the case is included along with media releases and links to judgments being appealed when available.
All 2024 - 2014 Supreme Court cases dismissed or deemed to be dismissed where a notice of abandonment was received can be found here.
Transcripts for cases heard before the Supreme Court are included provided they are not suppressed. Transcripts from pre-trial hearings are not published until the final disposition of trial. These are unedited transcripts and they are not a formal record of the Court’s proceedings. The Ministry of Justice does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of any material and recommends that users exercise their own skill and care with respect to its use.
17 August 2026
Case information summary (as at 17 August 2026) – Cases where leave granted (PDF, 87 KB)
Case information summary (as at 17 August 2026) – Cases where leave to appeal decision not yet made (PDF, 128 KB)
All years
Case name
Michael Andrew Keith Hastie v The Queen
Case number
SC 120/2011
Summary
Criminal Appeal – Whether the trial Judge should have given a Papadopoulos direction.[2011] NZCA 498 CA 153/2011
Result
The application for leave to appeal is granted.
The approved grounds of appeal are whether the directions given to the jury before it delivered its verdicts were appropriate and, if not, whether this gave rise to a substantial miscarriage of justice?
9 February 2012
_______________________
Appeal dismissed.
23 July 2012
Transcript
Elias CJ, Tipping, McGrath, William Young, Chambers JJ
Case name
Aldwyn John Cockburn, Janet Elizabeth Cockburn and Keith Ian Jeffries v C S Development No 2 Limited
Case number
SC 93/2010
Summary
Civil – GST due on sale of commercial property – Whether the Court of Appeal was correct to find that the sale of the property did not include the claimed supply of a going concern – Whether the Commissioner of Inland Revenue’s assessment that it was a going concern can only be questioned by challenge proceedings under the Tax Administration Act 1994.[2010] NZCA 373 CA 445/2009 16 August 2010.
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
Dates
Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
Costs of $2,500 to the respondent.
16 November 2010.
Case name
Keith Allenby v Terri Hannan and Middlemore Hospital of Counties Manukau District Health Board
Case number
SC 122/2010
Summary
Civil – Negligence – Accident Compensation Act 2001 – Application for pre-trial ruling– Whether unwanted pregnancy occasioned by failure of doctor to adequately perform sterilisation (tubal ligation) procedure covered by s 20(2)(b) of Accident Compensation Act as personal injury caused by medical misadventure – Whether application for pre-trial ruling can be the subject of “leapfrog” appeal to Supreme Court without prior judgments of High Court or Court of Appeal.[Civ 2010 404 3260 Priestley J 31 August 2010
Dates
Notice of Abandonment being lodged, the application is deemed to be dismissed.
Case name
David George Saggers v The Queen
Case number
SC 47/2009
Summary
Criminal Appeal – the appellant was convicted in the High Court for manufacturing methamphetamine and possessing equipment capable of being used in the manufacture of methamphetamine – Court of Appeal allowed the appellant’s appeal against conviction on the manufacturing charge and ordered a retrial but upheld the appellant’s conviction for possessing equipment capable of being used in the manufacture of methamphetamine – Appellant was found not guilty on the manufacturing charge at the retrial – Whether the guilty verdict on the charge of possessing equipment is inconsistent with the not guilty verdict on the manufacturing charge, amounting to a miscarriage of justice.[2008] NZCA 364 CA 121/2008 12 September 2008
Result
Application to leave to appeal dismissed. 30 July 2009
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
SAGGERS V R SC 47/2009 30 July 2009 (PDF, 14 KB)
Case name
The Queen v George Evans Gwaze
Case number
SC 93/2009
Summary
Criminal – Appeal against case stated decision – Whether Court of Appeal majority erred in concluding that the trial Judge’s decision to allow inadmissible hearsay “evidence” was an error of fact rather than an error of law and that therefore the case stated provisions of the Crimes Act 1961 were not engaged – Whether the Court of Appeal President erred in concluding that the Crown could succeed on an appeal under ss 380 and 380 of the Crimes Act 1961 in this case only if “To set aside the acquittal and direct a new trial would not be an unacceptable derogation from the spirit of the rule against double jeopardy”.[2009] NZCA 430 CA 90/2009 24 September 2009
Result
Application for leave to appeal granted.
23 November 2009
______________________
A The appeal is allowed and the acquittals are quashed. B A new trial is directed under s 382(2)(b) of the Crimes Act 1961. C A certified direction for new trial will issue to the Registrar of the High Court at Christchurch with the consequences provided for by ss 380(4) and 382(4) of the Crimes Act.
17 May 2010
23 November 2009
______________________
A The appeal is allowed and the acquittals are quashed. B A new trial is directed under s 382(2)(b) of the Crimes Act 1961. C A certified direction for new trial will issue to the Registrar of the High Court at Christchurch with the consequences provided for by ss 380(4) and 382(4) of the Crimes Act.
17 May 2010
Transcripts
- sc 93 2009 the queen v george evans gwaze (PDF, 539 KB)
Media Releases
Leave judgment - leave granted
R v GWAZE SC 93/2009 [23 November 2009] (PDF, 7 KB)
Substantive judgment
R v GWAZE SC 93/2009 [17 May 2010] (PDF, 167 KB)
Transcript
Hearing date : 25 February 2010
Elias CJ, Blanchard, McGrath, Wilson J.
Judgment appealed from
Case name
Georgina Kain, George Harry Couper Kain, George Charles Kain, George Thomas Carlton Kain and George Michael Kain and others v Jonathan Rhodes Hutton and others
Case number
SC 40/2007
Summary
Civil – dispute between family members over administration of a number of trusts – whether Court of Appeal erred in finding that resettlement of trust assets was valid – validity of exercise of power of appointment – power of advancement – s 41(c) of Trustee Act 1956 – whether appointment and settlement of shares was valid and not a fraud on the power – whether Court of Appeal erred in refusing to order the Second and Third Respondents to account to the trusts for profits made on the purchase of two farms – whether Court of Appeal erred in not finding a serious breach of trust – whether Court of Appeal erred in finding a particular part of consent order to be valid – interests of grandchildren – s 64A of Trustee Act 1956.CA 237/03, CA 271/04, CA 4/05 22 May 2007
Result
Leave to appeal granted.
20 November 2007
20 November 2007
Transcripts
- Hearing date 19 November 2007 SC 40/2007 (PDF, 128 KB)
- Hearing date 10 June 2008 SC 40/2007 (PDF, 281 KB)
Media Releases
- MR [2008] NZSC 61 (PDF, 88 KB)
Leave judgment - leave granted
Substantive judgment
KAIN AND ORS v HUTTON AND ORS SC 40/2007 [7 August 2008] (PDF, 113 KB)
Judgment appealed from
Case name
George Socrates Mamfredos and others v Herbert Equities Limited
Case number
SC 48/2007
Summary
Civil – principles applicable to lodging of caveats – whether, in the circumstances, the applicants (against whom caveat applications were brought) bore and failed to discharge an evidential onus – whether the Court of Appeal erred in fact and law, took irrelevant matters into account or failed to have regard to relevant pieces of evidence in overturning in part the High Court’s decision to dismiss the respondent’s caveat applications.CA 147/06 6 July 2007
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
Judgment appealed from
Case name
George Charlie Baker v The Queen
Case number
SC 51/2007
Summary
Criminal appeal – Sentencing Act 2002 – whether trial judge correctly applied s 104 in light of mitigating factor of appellant’s guilty plea – whether high publicity surrounding case lead to an unduly harsh sentence – whether trial judge gave sufficient weight to appellant’ s psychiatric history. CA 36/07 5 July 2007
Result
Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
19 September 2007
19 September 2007
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
BAKER V R SC 51/2007 [19 September 2007] (PDF, 14 KB)
Judgment appealed from
Case name
Jeffrey George Lopas and Lorraine Elizabeth McHerron v The Commissioner of Inland Revenue
Case number
SC 2/2006
Summary
Civil - tax - whether "the amount specified for the purposes of s 51(1)" in the Goods and Services Tax Act 1986, s 52(1) refers only to the monetary sum specified in s 51(1)(a) or to s 51(1) as a whole (including the exclusions in paras (c) and (d)) - whether the Commissioner of Inland Revenue can advance submissions contrary to propositions of law contained in the Commissioner's Statement of Position. CA 253/04 30 November 2005
Result
Application for leave to appeal dismissed. Costs to respondent $1,500.00.
2 August 2006
2 August 2006
Court of Appeal decision
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
Case name
Alwyn Keith Caie v The Atttorney-General and The New Zealand Police
Case number
SC 11/2006
Summary
Civil - appeal against decision of Court of Appeal dismissing appellant's appeal against decision of the High Court in which appellant succeeded - application for rehearing - approach to appeal by successful party in the Court below - appeal against reasoning but not findings themselves - whether Court of Appeal erred in restricting the presentation of arguments by the appellant to justiciable issues. CA 108/01 22 December 2005
Result
Leave to Appeal dismissed.
10 March 2006
10 March 2006
Court of Appeal decision
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
Page 5 of 6