Supreme Court case information

Listed below are the substantive Supreme Court cases for the year along with appeals still to be determined or cases awaiting hearing. 

Information giving an overview of the case is included along with media releases and links to judgments being appealed when available.

All 2024 - 2014 Supreme Court cases dismissed or deemed to be dismissed where a notice of abandonment was received can be found here.

Transcripts for cases heard before the Supreme Court are included provided they are not suppressed. Transcripts from pre-trial hearings are not published until the final disposition of trial. These are unedited transcripts and they are not a formal record of the Court’s proceedings. The Ministry of Justice does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of any material and recommends that users exercise their own skill and care with respect to its use.

3 July 2026

Case information summary (as at 3 July 2026) –  Cases where leave granted (PDF, 88 KB)
Case information summary (as at 3 July 2026)  – Cases where leave to appeal decision not yet made (PDF, 127 KB) 

All years

Case name
K   v The Queen
Case number
SC 113/2013
Summary
Criminal Appeal – Whether the evidence of the taped conversation was wrongly admitted at trial.[2013] NZCA 430   CA 106/2013
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
K v R [2014] NZSC 10 [20 February 2014] (PDF, 63 KB)
Dates

Application for leave to appeal dismissed.

20 February 2014.
Case name
FMB   v The Queen
Case number
SC 114/2013
Summary
Criminal appeal – Pre-trial – Cultivation of Cannabis – Misuse of Drugs Act 1975, s 9 – Breach of implied licence by police officer – Trespass – Evidence of cultivation obtained in the course of illegal search of property –Admission of improperly obtained evidence under Crimes Act 1961, s 379AB – Whether Court of Appeal correctly concluded that exclusion of the improperly obtained evidence would be disproportionate to the impropriety given the moderately serious breach of applicant’s rights and seriousness of the offending – Whether Court of Appeal correctly took into account the maximum penalty for the offence rather than the likely penalty the applicant would receive in their assessment of whether the offending was serious – Evidence Act 2006, s 30 – Admission of evidence is a substantial miscarriage of justice. [2013] NZCA 258   CA 66/2013
Dates

 Application for leave to appeal is dismissed.

26  November 2014.
Case name
MH v The Queen
Case number
SC 116/2013
Summary
Criminal Appeal – Evidence Act s 30 – pre-trial – whether the Court of Appeal erred in admitting evidence under s 30 of the Evidence Act.[2013] NZCA 432   CA 228/2013
Result
Application for leave to appeal is dismissed.

10 December 2013
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
JOHN LESTER MACKENZIE v R [2013] NZSC 143 [10 December 2013] (PDF, 57 KB)
Case name
Patrick Dean Norris  v The Queen
Case number
SC 127/2013
Summary
Criminal Appeal – Crimes Act 1961, s 220 – whether the Court of Appeal erred in finding that the requirements of s 220 were met – whether the Court of Appeal erred in refusing to allow the applicant to adduce new evidence[2013] NZCA 526  CA 59/2013
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
PATRICK DEAN NORRIS v R [2013] NZSC 138 [4 December 2013] (PDF, 84 KB)
Dates

 Application for leave to appeal dismissed.

4 December 2013.
Case name
Adrian James Leason, Peter Reginald Leo Murnane and Samuel Peter Frederick Land v The Attorney-General
Case number
SC 131/2013
Summary
Civil Appeal – Trespass – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in relation to its interpretation and application of the principle ex turpi causa non oritur actio – Whether the Court of Appeal erred by refusing to order a full trial in light of the assumed wrongful conduct given its obligations at international law – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in relation to its interpretation or application of defence of another and/or necessity – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in relation to the interpretation and application of the law governing admissibility of additional evidence on appeal.[2013] NZCA 509  CA 642/2011
Dates

Notice of abandonment being lodged, the application for leave to appeal is deemed to be dismissed.

5 February 2014.
Case name
Stanley Williard Hamon v The Queen
Case number
SC 136/2013
Summary
Criminal Appeal – Evidence Act 2006 – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in stating the law applicable to appeals brought on the basis of recanted evidence – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in determining that the recantation was untrue and there should be no retrial.[2013] NZCA 540  CA 183/2013
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
STANLEY WILLARD HAMON v R [2014] NZSC 39 [16 April 2014] (PDF, 92 KB)
Dates

Application for leave to appeal dismissed.

16 April 2014
Case name
Gibbston Downs Wines Limited v Property Ventures Limited (in receivership and liquidation)
Case number
SC 139/2013
Summary
Civil appeal – Whether a liquidator can issue a statutory demand in relation to a debt owed to the company that is subject to a charge or in respect of which a receiver has been appointed by a secured creditor – Whether Court of Appeal erred in its interpretation of s 254 of the Companies Act 1993 – Whether Court of Appeal erroneously admitted affidavit evidence from respondent and placed too much weight on it in reaching its decision – Whether section 50 of the Property Law Act 2007 applied.[2013] NZCA 546  CA 82/2013
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
GIBBSTON DOWNS WINES LIMITED v PROPERTY VENTURES LIMITED (IN RECEIVERSHIP AND LIQUIDATION) [2014] NZSC 21 [17 March 2014] (PDF, 19 KB)
Dates

The applications for leave to appeal are dismissed.

The applicants, jointly and severally, must pay the respondent costs in the amount of $5,000 plus all reasonable disbursements to be fixed if necessary by the Registrar.

17 March 2014.
Case name
Spinach Design Limited v Property Ventures Limited (in receivership and liquidation)
Case number
SC 140/2013
Summary
Civil appeal – Whether a liquidator can issue a statutory demand in relation to a debt owed to the company that is subject to a charge or in respect of which a receiver has been appointed by a secured creditor – Whether Court of Appeal erred in its interpretation of s 254 of the Companies Act 1993 – Whether Court of Appeal erroneously admitted affidavit evidence from respondent and placed too much weight on it in reaching its decision – Whether section 50 of the Property Law Act 2007 applied.[2013] NZCA 546  CA 83/2013
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
GIBBSTON DOWNS WINES LIMITED v PROPERTY VENTURES LIMITED (IN RECEIVERSHIP AND LIQUIDATION) [2014] NZSC 21 [17 March 2014] (PDF, 19 KB)
Dates

The applications for leave to appeal are dismissed.

The applicants, jointly and severally, must pay the respondent costs in the amount of $5,000 plus all reasonable disbursements to be fixed if necessary by the Registrar.

17 March 2014.
Case name
LM v The Queen
Case number
SC 143/2013
Summary
Criminal Appeal – Crimes Act 1961, ss 132 and 144A – Whether the offences in s 132 of the Crimes Act 1961 require physical contact with a child and a desire for sexual gratification – Whether New Zealand has the power to legislate against conduct beyond its own territory, in particular where the conduct is lawful in the place where it occurs – Whether or not the evidence justified the applicant’s convictions – Whether the Court of Appeal erred in upholding the applicant’s guilty plea -  [2013] NZCA 145    CA 217/2012
Result
Leave to appeal against conviction on the charge under s 144A of the Crimes Act 1961 is granted.  

The approved ground of appeal is whether s 144A criminalises offending as a party under s 66 of the Crimes Act.

The application to appeal against conviction on the charge under ss 131A and 145A of the Films, Videos and Publications Classification Act 1993 is dismissed.
20 February 2014
______________________
Appeal dismissed.
13 August 2014
Media Releases
Leave judgment - leave granted
LM v R [2014] NZSC 9 [20 February 2014] (PDF, 44 KB)
Supreme court decision
LM v R [2014] NZSC 64 [5 June 2014] (PDF, 49 KB)
Substantive judgment
LM v R [2014] NZSC 110 [13 August 2014] (PDF, 186 KB)
Transcript

Hearing date : 17 June 2014

Elias CJ, McGrath, William Young, Glazebrook, Arnold JJ.
Case name
CA v The Queen
Case number
SC 148/2013
Summary
Criminal Appeal – Search and Surveillance Act 2012, s 14 – Whether or not the Court of Appeal erred in finding that s 14 of the Search and Surveillance Act 2012 authorises forcible entry by police – Whether or not the Court of Appeal erred in finding the evidence to be admissible.                                                         [2013] NZCA 631  CA 455/2013
Dates

 Application for leave to appeal dismissed.

5 March 2014
Page 22 of 46