Supreme Court case information

Listed below are the substantive Supreme Court cases for the year along with appeals still to be determined or cases awaiting hearing. 

Information giving an overview of the case is included along with media releases and links to judgments being appealed when available.

All 2024 - 2014 Supreme Court cases dismissed or deemed to be dismissed where a notice of abandonment was received can be found here.

Transcripts for cases heard before the Supreme Court are included provided they are not suppressed. Transcripts from pre-trial hearings are not published until the final disposition of trial. These are unedited transcripts and they are not a formal record of the Court’s proceedings. The Ministry of Justice does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of any material and recommends that users exercise their own skill and care with respect to its use.

3 July 2026

Case information summary (as at 3 July 2026) –  Cases where leave granted (PDF, 88 KB)
Case information summary (as at 3 July 2026)  – Cases where leave to appeal decision not yet made (PDF, 127 KB) 

All years

Case name
Parsoa Bahramitash v Stish Kumar and Sunila Kumar
Case number
SC CIV 23/2004
Summary
Civil appeal - Conveyancing - Whether the Court of Appeal erred in ordering specific performance - Whether the remedy of specific performance is reserved by clauses 9.5 and 9.7 of the REINZ-ADLS standard form agreement for sale and purchase - Whether clause 4.2(2) provides an exclusive remedy and ousts the application of equitable principles. CA 51/04 8 November 2004
Result
Gault J; Blanchard J. Leave to appeal granted. 3 March 2005 ______________________ Appeal dismissed. Costs to respondent $15,000 plus disbursements. Reasons now added. 30 June 2005
Case name
Henry John Esdaile Nation v Nicola Mary Nation
Case number
SC CIV 26/2004
Summary
Relationship property - whether the determination of the date for assessment of the effect of disposition under s44C Property (Relationships) Act 1976 should be the date of the hearing - whether certain livestock is relationship property - whether a 'put to use' arrangement in respect of livestock can have the status of a property right for the purpose of s10(2) CA 190/03 26 November 2004
Result
21 April 2005

Leave to appeal granted.

8 April 2005

__________________

Notice of abandonment being lodged, the appeal is deemed to be dismissed.

Transcript

Hearing date 5 April 2005

Hearing date : 22 July 2005

Case name
Pourshad Marco Arvand v The Queen
Case number
SC CRI 3/2004
Result
It was adjudged that  the application for leave to appeal be dismissed.
15 July 2004
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
Summary
Judgment appealed from
not publicly available
Transcript

Hearing date : 7 July 2004

Elias CJ and Tipping J

Case name
Fiso Siloata
Case number
SC CRI 8/2004
Summary
Criminal appeal against conviction for possession of cannabis for supply - whether the jury must be unanimous that the defence has failed to rebut the presumption that possession of cannabis was for supply. CA 447/03 14 July 2004
Result
Leave to appeal granted.
14 September 2004
____________________________
Appeal dismissed.
16 December 2004
Leave judgment - leave granted
Supreme court decision
Case name
Kevin Moana Jarden
Case number
SC CRI 10/2004
Summary
Criminal appeal against conviction for sexual offending - whether there was a risk that the jury did not receive a balanced selection of material in its deliberations - whether transcripts of the video interviews of the complainants should have been left with the jury without transcripts of their cross-examination as well. CA114/04 29 July 2004
Result
Leave to appeal refused 20 October 2004
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
Case name
R v Atirut Sungsuwan.
Case number
SC CRI 11/2004
Summary
Criminal appeal against conviction - whether trial counsel made a fundamental error in not making an application under s23A of the Evidence Act to admit evidence of the complainant's previous sexual history - proper approach to whether an error by counsel has resulted in a miscarriage of justice: R v Paparachi (1993) 10 CRNZ 293 (CA) and Benedetto v R [2003] 1 WLR 1545 (PC) - whether prosecutor should be allowed to make statements in closing which are known to be contradicted to be called at trial. CA479/03 11 August 2004
Result
Leave to appeal granted.
17 December 2004
______________________
Appeal dismissed.
25 August 2005
Leave judgment - leave granted
Substantive judgment
Case name
Aerengaroa Timoti v The Queen
Case number
SC CRI 14/2004
Summary
Criminal appeal against conviction - Whether, in the circumstances of this case, provocation was available as a partial defence to murder under s167(d) of the Crimes Act - Whether the jury direction on provocation was inadequate, resulting in a miscarriage of justice. CA3/00 25 August 2004 PDF 92kb
Result
Leave to appeal granted.
10 December 2004
________________________
Appeal allowed. Conviction quashed. New Trial ordered.
21 June 2005
Leave judgment - leave granted
Case name
Yuang Ying Zhang v The Queen
Case number
SC CRI 15/2004
Summary
Appeal against conviction - jurisdiction of the Court of Appeal to hear appeal following guilty plea - whether s19(2)(b) of the Interpretation Act 1999 allows substitution of repealed offences in indictment - whether conspiracy to evade the Fisheries Act 1993 by fraudulent means can amount to a conspiracy under s247 of the Crimes Act 1961 (repealed) where the conduct engaged in is not criminal. - whether R v Walters [1993] 1 NZLR 533 (CA) correct - whether charge related to more than one transaction in breach of s329(6) of the Crimes Act. CA 153/04 13 July 2004
Result
Leave to appeal refused.
3 February 2005
Transcripts
Leave judgment - leave dismissed
Case name
Thomas Maxwell Clark v The Queen
Case number
SC CRI 20/2004
Summary
Criminal appeal against pre-trial ruling - whether Judge erred in declining to order severance of two counts of sexual offending - whether the evidence of mutual compaints sufficiently qualified as similar fact evidence - what the appropriate test for admission of similar fact evidence should be - whether the issue of possible collusion between the two complainants should have been explored on a voir dire before trial. CA 306/04 6 December 2004
Result
Application for leave dismissed. 10 May 2005
Leave judgment - leave dismissed